dark light

RPSmith

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,606 through 1,620 (of 2,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: AirSpace/Duxford – 14 Jul 07 #1243588
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Recently read that MAM have on display a German WW2 jet engine. Haven’t been able to see it but just wonder out loud if it might have come from Duxford???

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: An Unusual Restoration Project on E(vil)bay #1243596
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Be nice to see one of these at Old Warden alongside the other WW2 trainers there.

    Hairy πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜‰

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: North East Aircraft Museum…..updates #1243603
    RPSmith
    Participant

    …… We are applying for grants, etc to be able to build a new hardstanding for her followed by a hangar over her. Then, and only then, can we consider a re-paint and full external restoration…….

    LL Isn’t that taking a risk with the Vulcan’s future? How confident are you you will be able to raise the sustantial funds to provide a building to put her in and how long might it take? If you delay repainting until she is inside the other corrosion – instead of, perhaps, arresting now/next year could get a whole lot worse.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Currys Idea Centre #1243610
    RPSmith
    Participant

    ditto last night – wonder if the architects used the design elsewhere?

    Roger Smith

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Day petition #1244102
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Russell, I support and applaud your efforts but have to say I am not confident of the outcome.

    We, knowing a little (or in some cases a lot) more about it than joe public, place more importance on the Battle of Britain but in terms of British history is it, in the long run, any more important than, say, Trafalgar, Agincourt, D-Day, Spanish Armada, etc. Although Remembrance Day does mark a specific day in history it has become a general day to remember all who have fallen in all battles since.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: "Daa, da, da, da, da, da, da, da" Dambusters (merged) #1244118
    RPSmith
    Participant

    I see your point Matty but only a couple of weeks ago The Dambusters was included in a two part programme (a repeat I think) “Your 100 Best War Films” – I think I remember the Dambusters coming in at number 10.

    However that was after the watershed and it was surrounded by other war films with plenty of expletives in but the radio man in the ops room shouted out he had received the code-word “Digger” !!

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Fw-190D-13 "Yellow 10" has been sold! #1244691
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Several posts seem to have strayed from the core of the argument – whether or not to fly UNIQUE aircraft. The list in Pete Truman’s post includes mostly unique types such as the Mew Gull, whereas the Lancaster is not unique.

    I remember in the 1960’s filling in an SVAS questionnaire asking which Shuttleworth aircraft should next be restored to fly (and there were a lot unflyable then) and top of my list was the Comet. I still haven’t seen her in the air 😑 so I guess I fall in with the “Fly em” camp – but with reservations.

    However, picking up another aspect about the alternative (and sometimes there is little choice) to flying

    …. sitting on static display is quite useless and uninteresting to all and to the historical record……

    I would take great issue with this statement. An aircraft “sitting” in a museum can be far more accessible to many more people than a flyer.

    Let’s take, as an example, Spartan Arrow G-ABWP – a unique (ie sole survivor) of it’s type – a lovely aeroplane kept in flying condition by it’s owner (? Raymond Blain – still?) but it is many, many years since I have seen it and have no idea when I might see it next. I’m not for a moment suggesting the owner should surrender her to live for evermore in a museum but, if she were in a museum, I could travel tomorrow, or next week and go and gaze at her.

    I could go on with more arguments against statically displayed aircraft being “useless” but I’ll stop here.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Road Trip – Destination: Thunder #1245709
    RPSmith
    Participant

    I really enjoyed looking at these and reading captions – more please

    Roger Smith.

    RPSmith
    Participant

    … as they were all abject failures except perhaps the Avanti which has taken years to acheive some sort of sales success….

    Piaggio have stuck with the twin pusher arrangement for a long time – although I do remember their P.166 being noisy. I wonder if, conversely to an apparent increase in propellor noise with them being at the back, this layout meant it was quieter in the cabin?

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Bronco first flight at Duxford today #1246171
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Roobarb. Do catch up old chap. We’ve all gone digital here.

    I’m still with you Roobarb :p

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Caption Contest #1246176
    RPSmith
    Participant

    How about a competition for a logo or slogan for the back of his nice plain jacket ……

    I think a major fashion store already done it FCUK – add a U ?:D πŸ˜€

    Roger Smith

    RPSmith
    Participant

    Phew – glad I didn’t jump in with both feet when I first saw this – for some reason the name Arpin sprung into my head. πŸ™‚

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Day petition #1247749
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Have signed but am confused by this comment

    I had NO IDEA that the BoB Day had been cancelled πŸ™ .
    Alex

    can someone explain please?

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: U.S. Sea Harrier up date #1247947
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Harrier dead-stick landing.

    Just browsing through Nalls Aviation’s website the biographical details of Art Nalls says
    “While on a training mission attached to VMA-231, Art’s β€œHarrier” suffered a catastrophic engine failure near Richmond, Virginia. With little time to react, he essentially landed the Harrier engine-out at a civilian airfield. This was an extremely precise and risky landing, not normally attempted. The emergency procedures recommend an ejection. Art made a dead stick landing and he was consequently awarded an Air Medal, with gold numeral one for the act”

    How many (if any) other pilots have successfully landed a Harrier without engine power? I thought the aircraft had the glide-rate of the proverbial brick.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: U.S. Sea Harrier up date #1247963
    RPSmith
    Participant

    This was news to me.
    Pity they appear to be turning it into an AV-8 but, I suppose, “needs must”.
    The project appears to be benefitting uk’s exports πŸ˜€

    Roger Smith.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,606 through 1,620 (of 2,488 total)