Mark, I am presuming the Council couldn’t simply throw the Museum off it’s site and a deal would be struck to provide a suitable alternative site and meet costs of relocating – emphasis on suitable. Strong management might be required.
Roger Smith.
Hmm – if the reports on pprune turn out to be right, it doesnt look good for the museum.
Bruce
Perhaps shouldn’t be too pessimistic – “every cloud” and all that.
Although a move would involve a lot it could be that the MAM will come out of it “smelling of roses” again.
Roger Smith.
Two points Bruce.
As regards “developing” the land, both MAM and the Airport fall within Warwickshire and Coventry does not have control of planning issues – hence the refusal/continued opposition of the new terminal application.
I’m not sure of the current position but Coventry City Council had a slightly different relationship than just Landlord and Tenant. When we (The Midland A.P.S.) first came to an agreement with the Council (1975) to lease a small plot on the edge of the airport we were rented it “for a peppercorn” – an old legal term for a small sum of money. The basis of this was that the Museum would take over/relieve the Council of it’s duty to record, present, etc the history of aviation in Coventry.
Also, with regard to the NIMBYs, there is (perhaps), currently, a ‘window of opportunity’ for the new airport operator. The news (announced almost the same time as the confirmation of the Papal visit to the airport in September) of the planned route for the proposed high-speed rail link from London to Birmingham has got the locals stirred up. The route will pass close to the airport and the NIMBYs will be busy fighting that. Perhaps the new operator should resubmit another planning application for a new terminal while their thoughts are elsewhere. :diablo:
Roger Smith.
The Midland Air Museum’s site, including it’s car park, is 4.3 acres (more than a few square feet) owned by Coventry City Council and on lease to the Museum. I would estimate the lease has about another 10 – 12 years to run.
Althought the MAM’s original site WAS part of the Airport the ‘new site’ was agricultural land adjoining the airport boundary – both areas owned by the Council.
Bruce you say “not a prime piece of airport land” but it has a long road frontage (Rowley Road) which might be attractive for development. However access to the airport through the MAM site would not be straightforward as there are two substantial buildings near the boundary of the airport – but maybe that’s not what is meant??
This is worrying – are you able to say where your information is from Moggy?
Roger Smith.
I was standing in hangar 7 speaking to Dave a couple of weeks ago. He told me ‘ownership’ had passed to John Corley – AA Classic Flight’s Chief Pilot.
No news on the fuselage but next time I get to speak to John (I’m talking weeks, not days) will ask him.
Roger Smith.
AW.52 Flying Wing TS363 also landed itself on 30th May, 1949 after test pilot J.O. Lancaster ejected (first use in UK of Martin Baker bang seat in an emergency) when an asymmetric flutter developed and the aircraft became uncontrollable.
There was not a lot of damage although I don’t think the aircraft flew again.
Roger Smith.
no i realise, insurance is in hand 😉
The main problem is the current future of baginton airport 🙁 we cant do anything like that until we know that the airport isnt going to be turned into a large council estate ;(
If you’re still at Baginton in September – a great opportunity for fund-raising (assuming it IS Baginton the Pope is coming to) and you might get a Papal blessing too :):D
Roger Smith.
In the video he says “three flew for the RAF in World War 2 and a couple of older ones…”
Glad the cat was ok.
Roger Smith.
It is, perhaps, poignant that Wales were playing Ireland today (Saturday 13th) in what has developed into the [I]Six Nations[I] rugby contest.
Roger Smith.
Was the Thompson related to the Zwicky 3-wheel bowser?
Roger Smith.
I’ve always had difficulty in understanding why the Ju88 and the Me110 are in the BoB hall – both are nightfighters and, presumably, were in use against Bomber Command’s aircraft over Germany/occupied Europe. Surely one of them should be in the Bomber Command Hall?
Roger Smith.
The proposal I seem to recall was for fitting Skybolt (externally) to Concorde – can’t remember whether it was one or multiple.
Roger Smith.
Seem to have gone a bit off track?
…Im just interested in pure training types e.g. 504, Tiger Moth, Chipmunk, Jetstream etc. Pilot training ab initio, basic, advanced, multi engine etc….
Roger Smith
Kestrel (Miles), Proctor, Prentice ?
Roger Smith.
I was cheeky enough to mail it to Norwegian ASA (the airline) saying the only thing that stood between me and a perfect kill was lack of ammo.
If you lived in the US (and, maybe, UK) and did that I bet you’d pretty soon have a couple of men in suits and dark glasses knocking on your door :diablo:
Roger Smith.
PS great post