dark light

RPSmith

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 2,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Movie remakes – Top Gun 2 #908656
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Obviously brought about by the thawing of relations with Iran……

    “hey guys, can we borrow some of your Tomcats?” :highly_amused::eagerness:

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Lutterworth E28/39 replica/statue 'at risk' #910780
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Thanks Buccaneer66. Presumably the moulds were made from drawings. I wonder if the Science Museum cooperated?

    I’m just thinking out loud here and wonder now if the three went from Torclad at Blaby to Ansty to have the extra steelwork installed to either fit on the stands or to take the undercarriage. And perhaps to make the wings of one of the three removable before going on to Jet Age as I think they used it as a travelling exhibit before the Museum was built.

    Roger Smith.

    PS I do like the first of Flanker_man’s pictures – it’s just a shame a “third generation” jet (Lightning?) wasn’t there between the Hunter and the Typhoon.

    in reply to: Lutterworth E28/39 replica/statue 'at risk' #911789
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Which ‘abomination’ is that sadsack ??

    Ken, I think there was a total of 3 made ie road island at Lutterworth, road island at Farnborough and the last on it’s wheels at Jet Age Museum. I don’t believe the Farnborough Museum has one on display.

    Buccaneer66 “Where I used to work we made both of those memorials” what company was that and which two (of the three) did you work on? I believe volunteers at Rolls-Royce, Ansty (maybe members of the Rolls-Royce Heritage Trust) did work on at least one – probably the Jet Age museum one?

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Lutterworth E28/39 replica/statue 'at risk' #913249
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Must admit my first reaction was “… how much???…” But, after a little thought, I came to more or less the same conclusion as David Burke.

    For those that haven’t been there it’s a traffic island on a busy road and, being near the Magna Park warehouse-cum-industrial estate (ex Bitteswell airfield), there are a lot of large lorries going by.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Sad RAF Museum #915393
    RPSmith
    Participant

    A lot of complaints are aimed at the RAFM for the ‘son et lumiere’ part of the Battle of Britain hall. I agree it can be a bit annoying or you could take a seat and watch it! There can’t be anyone on this forum that doesn’t know it takes place so why not, when you arrive, take note/find out what the running times are and visit that part of the Museum accordingly?

    It does seem strange that the ‘carrier deck’ show at the FAAMuseum doesn’t attract similar critiscm.

    Don’t get me wrong there are things about the RAFM and it’s actions I don’t like but, I think, almost anything is an improvement over when it first opened to the public. Visiting not long after it opened, whilst it was wonderful to see all these aeroplanes on public display at last, my first impression of the place was a cross between a cathedral and a hospital!

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Dewoitine 551 recreation #916685
    RPSmith
    Participant

    It would make an interesting small book/magazine article on comparison of the development by different companies in different countries of the different V-12 engines in the 1930s (and 1940s ?).

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: A Forum addition? #916693
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Sound idea, and good to have you back Kev.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Sad RAF Museum #917318
    RPSmith
    Participant

    I presume NCP are car parking experts. So why can’t they introduce variable-time parking charges. The longer the car is in the car park the more the driver pays. Prices could then be set to favour/accommodate genuine visitors to the Museum and, at the same time, deter the commuters.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Silly question again. #920176
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Buuuut “in theory” can’t the Design Authority be transferred eg at the other end of the spectrum DHSupport?

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Restorers TV Series Coming Soon ? #920442
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Wasn’t there mention hereabouts 2 – 3 weeks ago of the TV series shown many moons ago covering the restoration of Moth G-ABYA?

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Did British Bombers Have De-icing boots? #847173
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Trying to remember back nearly 50 years to my apprenticeship at Dunlop in Coventry……

    I think there were three types of rubber ‘boots’.

    Those that were rigid and were supplied hot air (from the exhausts?) the heated rubber preventing ice forming (anti-icing)
    Those that liquid de-icer fluid was sent under hydraulic pressure through the boot to exude out of small holes and prevent ice forming (anti-icing)
    Those that were flexible pneumatic boots where pressurized air was sent in to stretch the rubber and expand it so after the ice formed the expanding rubber would cause the ice break off (de-icing)

    However in my days there the latest weren’t exactly boots but rubber strips that had electrical elements running through them which would heat up (anti-icing). These rubber strips would be bonded to the skin of the aircraft and this meant the parts of the aircraft so equipped would be shipped to the Coventry factory and the bonding was carried out in large ovens. There was a lot of Fokker F.27 bits around then, as well as flying surface leading edge units the rubber strips would be all around the engine intakes.

    Towards the end of my time there were new l-a-r-g-e ovens being installed for what appeared to be a growing market for anti-icing units for helicopter blades – I think the whole blade went into the oven.

    So, ‘rule of thumb’ anti-icing prevents the ice from forming in the first place, de-icing gets rid of the ice once it has formed.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Bomber Wheels On A Truck Picture On FB #850344
    RPSmith
    Participant

    If that guy standing on the trailer deck is of average height then I guesstimate those tyres are about 11 ft diameter – much to large for a Lancaster or B-17 ???

    The Truck (an AEC?) looks a bit modern for that era of aircraft to – perhaps someone can date it.

    I can’t read any of the notice but adding in the depth of the tread I would guess (again) they are for an earth-mover type vehicle?

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Horespower, thrust, clydesdales and making babies. #857117
    RPSmith
    Participant

    What I’d like to know is if the calculations using horsepower takes into account the thrust from the horse when it lifts it’s tail and f*rts?

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Meet The Dambusters – British Pathe #910051
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Was the Lanc NX611, ……. jack…

    Definitely NX611 – the white panel on port nose just forward of the cockpit was the original white that was painted around when the camo scheme was applied.

    Roger Smith

    in reply to: Tiger Moth Seats #910052
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Such a company exhibited at The Moth Rally at the weekend – From the souvenir programme I think it must have been Unique Design & Fabrication Ltd. tel. 07711813739; email [email]a.baxter46@ntlworld.com[/email]

    Roger Smith.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 2,488 total)