dark light

Kernowglyn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 98 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: p-38 info #1245914
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    485 mph. I don’t think so! Muahahaha…………………………………………..
    The fastest model under specific ideal conditions could touch 414 mph.

    in reply to: Are these 'stock' images used by the RAF? #1250283
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    Clearly the work of official photographers. The purpose may be to do with public relations in that the photographs could be given to the press, but some would likely be for the unit, station, or command archives.

    in reply to: Short Belfast #1251586
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    When I had to undertake tours in Ulster in my service days we preferred going by Belfast as our AAC choppers could be pushed in without having to be dismantled, as was the case with the Hercules. Not such a minor point if you have to do it!

    in reply to: Jet vs Jet 1946 #1260003
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    Really, it comes down to the P-80 and Me-262. As the Meteor was to slow and the Kikka we just don’t know with the data available. From there I would have to give the P-80 the advantage! Of course I would have admit my American bias to be far……………:o

    For the date in question the Meteor was the fastest fighter in the world. The speeds of the P-80 and the Vampire were identical.

    in reply to: Pat Monk – RIP #1262552
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    A splendid obituary. You did your friend proud.

    in reply to: Classic Aviation Literature #1268820
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    The Shape of the Aeroplane by James Hay Stevens
    Fate is the Hunter by Ernest K Gann
    Adventures with Fate by Harald Penrose
    Pilots Summer by Frank Tredrey
    Rearsby recalled by Les Leetham
    Chickenhawk by Robert Mason
    And any Eric ‘Winkle’ Brown title.

    in reply to: HA! HA! HA! #1268833
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    I would like to ask the chairman for his thoughts……….

    in reply to: Bofors Gun Query #1270524
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    I may be wrong in what Im about to say, but, Challenger 2 tanks use a 7.62mm GPMG as a spotter so based on that I would say yes its a spotting weapon with the added benefit of extra AA firepower and in my own experience of firing an 84mm Carl Gustav AT weapon which had a single shot sighting “rifle” attached to the side of it. Thats my view, if Im wrong then I look forwards to being corrected and educated in this piece of history. Bex

    I think you will find that it was the Chieftain tank that used a burst of three .50″ cal tracer slugs as a ranging device for the 120mm main armament. Nowadays with the improved ranging systems fitted to the big boys and the incredibly flat trajectory of the armour piercing shot of the 120mm, the .50″ cal machine gun is not used in that role. the 7.62 mm coaxially mounted MG is used for soft targets, the roof mounted 7.62mm being for ‘air defence’.

    in reply to: Gloster Gladiators, Some pics #1274106
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    Many years ago we had a neighbour who was in the RAF before WW2. He stated that the Gauntlet possessed the finest flying characteristics of any and all the aircraft that he flew.

    in reply to: Gloster Gladiators, Some pics #1274291
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    I’m always glad to see Gloster Gladiators, but I’ll throw down the gauntlet to see who can post photos of its predecessor!

    in reply to: Short Seamew:anything left?? #1274989
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    One feature the type had, which I think was unique, were the windscreen wipers with one sweeping the lower half and the other the top. Normally an aircraft lands at 30% faster than its stalling speed on an airfield, (1.3Vstall) but on a carrier it is only 10% above. In the Seamews case the combination of large wing area and low weight prevented this from happening and it was subjected to considerable buffeting on the landing approach due to disturbed airflow around the carriers island and deck. They found on trials that they had to land faster on a carrier than they did on land. That may have been unique too. The trials at sea stopped when a signal was received telling them that the type was not going to be accepted for service. I know someone who was part of the trials team who told me that nobody wanted the data collected during the trials when they docked in the UK and it was dumped.

    in reply to: General Discussion #337657
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    Vista sys requirement:

    800Mhz CPU
    512 Mb RAM
    15GB HDD
    DirectX 9 graphics card with 64Mb RAM

    Add AT LEAST 50% on to of those figures for anything like decent perfomance…..

    Thank you. Being a cautious type of chap I always make sure that I’m well over specified as programmes today are not as tightly written as they once were. The iMac clearly well exceeds the first 3 requirements, but I don’t know about Direct X 9. Will look into it. Cheers.

    in reply to: AppleMac or PC ? #1940600
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    Vista sys requirement:

    800Mhz CPU
    512 Mb RAM
    15GB HDD
    DirectX 9 graphics card with 64Mb RAM

    Add AT LEAST 50% on to of those figures for anything like decent perfomance…..

    Thank you. Being a cautious type of chap I always make sure that I’m well over specified as programmes today are not as tightly written as they once were. The iMac clearly well exceeds the first 3 requirements, but I don’t know about Direct X 9. Will look into it. Cheers.

    in reply to: Spitfire Tr. Pilots Notes #1275455
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    In regard to the two seat Spitfires that are flying could anyone advise please if a specific set of Pilots Notes were compiled and if not which standard set were utilised in lieu of!

    Good question! I am the ‘specialist’ for flight manuals and pilots notes for Air-Britain (tries to look important, fails miserably – again!). I have never seen one for a 2 seat Spitfire, but assume (is this wise?) that PNs were originally produced for them when new by the manufacturer. OTOH it could be that they were so similar in handling to the single seat ones that it was felt no notes were required. Did the Irish Air Corps produce their own notes for them? Perhaps somebody from the Emerald Isle can tell us.

    in reply to: General Discussion #337961
    Kernowglyn
    Participant

    Oh, I’ll be brave and try to soldier on with a measly 24″ screen! In fact I think I’ll have to wait until Panther has been reviewed by some journo on his iMac24 using Vista and giving rave reviews.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 98 total)