485 mph. I don’t think so! Muahahaha…………………………………………..
The fastest model under specific ideal conditions could touch 414 mph.
Clearly the work of official photographers. The purpose may be to do with public relations in that the photographs could be given to the press, but some would likely be for the unit, station, or command archives.
When I had to undertake tours in Ulster in my service days we preferred going by Belfast as our AAC choppers could be pushed in without having to be dismantled, as was the case with the Hercules. Not such a minor point if you have to do it!
Really, it comes down to the P-80 and Me-262. As the Meteor was to slow and the Kikka we just don’t know with the data available. From there I would have to give the P-80 the advantage! Of course I would have admit my American bias to be far……………:o
For the date in question the Meteor was the fastest fighter in the world. The speeds of the P-80 and the Vampire were identical.
A splendid obituary. You did your friend proud.
The Shape of the Aeroplane by James Hay Stevens
Fate is the Hunter by Ernest K Gann
Adventures with Fate by Harald Penrose
Pilots Summer by Frank Tredrey
Rearsby recalled by Les Leetham
Chickenhawk by Robert Mason
And any Eric ‘Winkle’ Brown title.
I would like to ask the chairman for his thoughts……….
I may be wrong in what Im about to say, but, Challenger 2 tanks use a 7.62mm GPMG as a spotter so based on that I would say yes its a spotting weapon with the added benefit of extra AA firepower and in my own experience of firing an 84mm Carl Gustav AT weapon which had a single shot sighting “rifle” attached to the side of it. Thats my view, if Im wrong then I look forwards to being corrected and educated in this piece of history. Bex
I think you will find that it was the Chieftain tank that used a burst of three .50″ cal tracer slugs as a ranging device for the 120mm main armament. Nowadays with the improved ranging systems fitted to the big boys and the incredibly flat trajectory of the armour piercing shot of the 120mm, the .50″ cal machine gun is not used in that role. the 7.62 mm coaxially mounted MG is used for soft targets, the roof mounted 7.62mm being for ‘air defence’.
Many years ago we had a neighbour who was in the RAF before WW2. He stated that the Gauntlet possessed the finest flying characteristics of any and all the aircraft that he flew.
I’m always glad to see Gloster Gladiators, but I’ll throw down the gauntlet to see who can post photos of its predecessor!
One feature the type had, which I think was unique, were the windscreen wipers with one sweeping the lower half and the other the top. Normally an aircraft lands at 30% faster than its stalling speed on an airfield, (1.3Vstall) but on a carrier it is only 10% above. In the Seamews case the combination of large wing area and low weight prevented this from happening and it was subjected to considerable buffeting on the landing approach due to disturbed airflow around the carriers island and deck. They found on trials that they had to land faster on a carrier than they did on land. That may have been unique too. The trials at sea stopped when a signal was received telling them that the type was not going to be accepted for service. I know someone who was part of the trials team who told me that nobody wanted the data collected during the trials when they docked in the UK and it was dumped.
Vista sys requirement:
800Mhz CPU
512 Mb RAM
15GB HDD
DirectX 9 graphics card with 64Mb RAMAdd AT LEAST 50% on to of those figures for anything like decent perfomance…..
Thank you. Being a cautious type of chap I always make sure that I’m well over specified as programmes today are not as tightly written as they once were. The iMac clearly well exceeds the first 3 requirements, but I don’t know about Direct X 9. Will look into it. Cheers.
Vista sys requirement:
800Mhz CPU
512 Mb RAM
15GB HDD
DirectX 9 graphics card with 64Mb RAMAdd AT LEAST 50% on to of those figures for anything like decent perfomance…..
Thank you. Being a cautious type of chap I always make sure that I’m well over specified as programmes today are not as tightly written as they once were. The iMac clearly well exceeds the first 3 requirements, but I don’t know about Direct X 9. Will look into it. Cheers.
In regard to the two seat Spitfires that are flying could anyone advise please if a specific set of Pilots Notes were compiled and if not which standard set were utilised in lieu of!
Good question! I am the ‘specialist’ for flight manuals and pilots notes for Air-Britain (tries to look important, fails miserably – again!). I have never seen one for a 2 seat Spitfire, but assume (is this wise?) that PNs were originally produced for them when new by the manufacturer. OTOH it could be that they were so similar in handling to the single seat ones that it was felt no notes were required. Did the Irish Air Corps produce their own notes for them? Perhaps somebody from the Emerald Isle can tell us.
Oh, I’ll be brave and try to soldier on with a measly 24″ screen! In fact I think I’ll have to wait until Panther has been reviewed by some journo on his iMac24 using Vista and giving rave reviews.