dark light

Ja Worsley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,251 through 2,265 (of 3,659 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: EFV (formerly AAAV) #2074180
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I know Australia is interested in this vechiule, they would help fill a gap in our fighting forces when we get the new LHD’s

    in reply to: torpedos question #2074400
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Australia uses American Mk-48’s and Mk-46’s on the Helos, though the Seakings gave up their ASW role a long time ago and the new Super Seasprites won’t carry torps unless abosolutly neccessary.

    in reply to: RAN to Study Amphibious Ship Options #2074402
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Here you go mate, this is has the full details in it
    Discussion on SIA about the options

    in reply to: sub diving plain positioning #2074529
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    There’s not reeally that much of a difference, except in the nose performance, if they are on the bow, then the nose will rise slightly quicker, but for the most part, with Subs, it really doesn’t make a difference since ballast is the work horse of diving and submerging.

    What is more interesting is the difference between Ballast control on Western Subs and ballast on Russian subs, as they both have different ways of controlling it, the Western way is more complex. Look it up, i have it in a book somewhere about here, should be on the net too!

    Not to sure about Chinese types, but since most of their subs have derived from Russian, it stands to reason that they’d use the Russain ballast controls.

    in reply to: RAN to Study Amphibious Ship Options #2074533
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    It’s a well known conclussion down here that the Izar ship has won this comp and that this is just a formality, their ship is bigger and better suited to the needs that we intend to put them through.

    What the government is really asking the Spanish is; if we buy this ship design and the F-100’s can we get a cheaper price? The Spanish are looking into it.

    in reply to: A-10 on a lead diet #2648644
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Having the chunk taken out of the forward tawil plane like that would have shot the trim characteristics to hell, but I’ve seen pics of B-17’s during WWII that are far worse than this, I remember one where the entire midsection was ripped open, from top to bottom but held one to make a landing.

    in reply to: Italy Launches New Aircraft Carrier #2074685
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    IIRC this ship is supposed to be bigger that GG right? Wonder if there is going to be another order of Harriers before the F-35B’s actually start to be released for sale?

    in reply to: Barracuda specs mismatch (DCN vs. MN) #2074834
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Same here, DCN would know what they are doing.

    in reply to: Indian Air Defense Ship Makes Progress #2074836
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    So are there any pics of what these ships are finally going to look like?

    in reply to: Type 23 Frigates for Chile? #2074837
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I thought the Chilian’s didn’t buy the dutch ships, or am I talking about something else again?

    in reply to: To any Greeks, or similarly knowledgeable ppl here.. #2074841
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Damd man where can I buy one?

    in reply to: Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers #2074842
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Great info posted in that site, have saved it to my file. I still think the other design should have won for the CVF.

    in reply to: Carrier using nations.. #2074843
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    It’s not just the US that would help us out, the UK still have soverign rights over us and thus if we were attacked, they would have to help in our defence (why not we’ve helped her out how many times?)

    Besides we had treaties with other nations in our region that support us, Singapore and Japan just to name two, and if you ask me, I’d hate to get on the wrong side of those two 😉

    in reply to: Minas Gerais / Vengeance: farewell #2075060
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Man those are some sad pics there, especially that last one, reminds me of what happened to USS Cabot/ SNS Dedalo.

    I remember that group that wanted to save her for a museum, they approached Australian’s (especially ex-navy people) to chip in to buy her. They just couldn’t get enough money nor could they get a place to keep her, the British government said no to basing her in the UK. Australian government said they didn’t have a place to put her but offered to sink her for a dive wreck.

    India out bid China (which I found interesting) and we all know why China wanted her 😉

    in reply to: Carrier using nations.. #2075184
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I don`t think australia need a new carrier, we have been strong enough to defeat any country around us. Just do not follow usa on every thing.

    Gatling, mate we have been strong, up untill the government gave the Little War Canoe’s the flick (aka DDG’s). with those we had a fighting force, but no all we got is a joke! Still it should be interesting to see how the Fagboats (FFG’s) turn out after this little experiment of ading a VLS in front of the Mk-13.

    As for Carriers and following the US, I can’t see how we’d be following the US by getting these two ships? They are of a totally different class to any thing the USN has, Not even the Wasp or Tarawa Classes are down rated enough to be compared to these small ships. The best comparrison would be that of the RTN Chakri Nareubet, and even that is smaller than the Spanish PdA which was modeled on an ABORTIVE US concept. So if we follow the US it’s only by a fourth step (modeled on the “seven steps to fame” role).

Viewing 15 posts - 2,251 through 2,265 (of 3,659 total)