Not really mate, down here we are proud of our heritage, people are interested in the past. I know many people who are interested in seeing these ships but medically can’t dive, if we had a ship like this then it would be very profitable indeed.
You could be right Steve, but what has thrown me on this pic is the pointy nose.
While we’re at it, what about the Hovercraft the British used to use, i know Iran bought some of these before the fall of the Shar.
Is there a specific African Navy that you are after mate?
This explains why in the pics I have beside me dated Circca 91, there is still an Iraqi Flag on them!
If I were the Iraqi Pm I’d pay the money and get them to my base, then I’d have an instant navy once again, maybe the Italian’s might be feeling generous and work out something with the new Iraqi government!
No prob mate
Fair enough mate, we all know America is a bag of dirty tricks, they have even tried to interfere with our federal ellections to keep little Johnny in. Bad play.
Just once I’d like to see a thread where no one mentions any bad stuff about anyone esle, I know I can dream, but hey!
Blackcat, calm yourself. I have no quarrel with anyone that goes below 150 Meters wether they are American, Russian, German, Japanese or Chinese, they all know the risks!
The USN has lost many people in the Cold war simply because they were trying to do much that could not be done. I spent 6 weeks on one trip under water, so I won’t take any bad words on any thread about us Subbies, ok mate!
J-7: According to my sources the F-25T’s are counted as a different class mate, this is because of the Higher content of Western Equipment on board, There are two ships in this class Taksin and Naresuan These are denoted by having different numbers in the Thai naval numbering system 420 and 421.
These ships also have the ability to hanger a helo unlike the Jianghu V’s which can only land a helo, as such their crew compliment is slightly higher: From 168 up to 176.
Here she is on a normal day

Her sister ships are:
Bangpakong 456
Kraburi 457
Saiburi 458
Here is Bangpakong
[img]http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/thailand/images/bang-pakon…]
And here is Saiburi, you can see here that Saiburi and Kraburi are both of the Jianghu V class having the helo deck aft, where as the Chao Phraya and the Bangpakong are of the older Jianghu I class with the second gun aft.

Here is a little info I have on them:
Displacement [Right]1,800 normal, 1,960 full load [/Right]
Length [RIGHT]338.5 feet / 103.2 meters [/RIGHT]
Beam [RIGHT]33.4 feet / 10.2 meters [/RIGHT]
Draft [RIGHT]10.2 feet / 3 meters [/RIGHT]
Speed [RIGHT]28 kts [/RIGHT]
Armament [RIGHT]
[/RIGHT]
Systems [RIGHT]
[/RIGHT]
Crew [RIGHT]168 [/RIGHT]
That’s right they changed the Aluminium rivits to Stainless steal, and coated them in fiberglass.
Blast area could also take out a few of the smaller ships, thus it is still a valid point. Firing one of these missiles into a squadron of landing craft could knock out at least five in one hit, provided that they are travelling in a group and not line abreast or stagered line astern. So it is a question of how an group is planing on breaching a beach head and countering the effect, technically it is still possible. I remember in the RAN we talked about an experiment where landing craft were taken out with an AIM 7 Sparrow and a Roland SAM, the Roland did more damage, but the Sparrow had the advantage of being launched from the air.
I know but not one as large as this 😉
MR: Mate no it doesn’t involve smuggling, Australia has many ship wrecks around it’s coast line, some scuttled (including my favourite HMAS Australia I, a Drednaught class Battle cruiser from WWI) with a ship such as this we could take tours of these shipsto see thm how they are now and such, also would be good for up around the Pacific Islands for WWII tours, maybe we’d find those japanese carriers at last!
I find it interesting that American’s didn’t know that China was building a new sub (Yuan Class). So much for American Intelligence!!!