SLL: Mate the latest issue of “The Navy” has an article about the PLAN’s carrier wishes, with a huge big pic of the Varyag sitting nicely in Dalian, all painted and finished- they said that she was due for sea trails later in the year- since this is a quaterly mag, one can only assume that she has already put to sea for the start of their testing period (yes I do know the problems with assuming- but I know the Chinese and I also remember those here who said that I was off my rocker claiming that Varyag was going to be a Carrier in the PLAN service- Guess I can’t be wrong will much considering my experience- sorry if that sounds a little on the arrogant side).
Sens: Mate Albania, they just retired their last few Mig-15’s a couple of years ago, I agree that most had not been flying for some time, but there were some that were!
Scoot: Mate you are probably right about both parties bearing some of the blame each, though IMHO it is all India’s fault, they knew the condition of the ship before they even started pricing it, then look at the fiasco over the price and finally this. Sorry mate, I can’t see how the Russians could be in the wrong here. They just wanted to sell off their scrap to make a few dollar to kick start their terrible economy, it’s not their fault that this has happened. India is well known for wanting far too much for far too cheap a price- they claim that they don’t have the money yet they have one of the best economys in the world and how many countries are on a spending spree atm to boost their navies- I can only think of one-CHINA, the rest of the world has reduced their military budget.
Fed: Mate I’m not harsh on Russian equipment, Soviet maybe but not Russian- however, their shipping industry seems to lack the same ability to built equipment that lasts forever as what the Aircraft and Army supliers do. For example we all know that there are wearhouses in Russia that house old artillery that can be used again in a time of need, and look at all the old Russian planes still flying around the world- heck even old Mig-15’s were recently retired in some former eastern European countries.
But the naval side is the let down here- look at the old Moskva and Leningradska- coincidence that they both had fires in their engine rooms? The Kievs had their problems as well including engine room fires and what about that sub whos reactor fell through the hull and sat on the bottom for months? And finally, the less said about the reactors on the Alpha class subs the better I think. With all this, can you blame me for being harsh on this topic?
They will still go ahead with the deal, they will accept the Migs without question- at least they are coming along nicely (First one off the production line just made it’s first flight not long ago). The ADS however should now be stepped up in it’s production efforts and any follow on orders of Migs might now have to contend with a Naval Tejas which might now be kicked in to gear as India starts to realise that if it wants to be a big gun in the world- it has to stop relying on outsiders for its equipment and get its act together in house. I agree with you though that they maybe a great source of carrier building, but sadly they must get it together- no one in their right mind will buy a carrier, or anything else for that matter, from a country who takes for ever to decide on what it wants and even longer to build it.
Correct me if I am wrong, but weren’t there supposed to be three ADS’s? This was supposed to give the IN four carriers with three at sea at any one time. And how much longer can they keep Viraat going? She really is starting to show her age.
Pi: Mate they are already building that facility at Dabolim, where the base has been undergoing a major reconstruction of both facilities and ammenities for all INS flying ops and aircraft.
SLL: Varyag is undergoing sea trials now with the PLAN, afterwhich she is set to become the PLAN’s Training carrier- what people here are failing to understand is that yes it is a training carrier, but for a country that has never had a working carrier the first thing we can expect to see from them is the Varyag going to sea with a load of helos while the ships crew learn how to use the ship- then later she will start deploying her SU-33’s that are currently on order (40 IIRC). What I’d like to know is, Have the PLAN announced yet the new name of Varyag?
Sorry guys, but for me this is no suprise :rolleyes:. India and Russia will always have close ties no matter how far delayed any project gets. Sure India wants Western equipment due to its obvious superiority, but because the Russians will always offer good equipment for very low prices, there is no one to blame except the Indians themselves.
Scoot: F-35B is indeed proving to be on the minds of the few countries that are now looking at LHD’s, but wether they get them or not is another question don’t you think? I mean the F-35A is due for international release in 2015, give it a few years after that before the B models are released.
Seems we have a PRC spy on our hands here guys. Welcome honerable member, you do us credit to share your knowledge- may the jade dragon shine over your house!
P.S. I’m glad you aren’t my father 😀
If anyone would be concerned with Japanese flat tops, it would be both China and Korea, lessons lerned years ago have not been forgotten and though Japan and Korea are friends there is still a slight bit of hesitation there. Ever wondered why Korea built Dokdo so soon after finding out that Japan was going for the DDH?
My thoughts exactly Scoot, and that does indeed seem to be the standard practice with them. Another reason why I think the LHT idea is a far better choice for the aviation training vessel for the ADF.
Originally the Kanimbla and Manoora were designated THSS- meaning Training and Helo Support Ships, but the temptation to use them in the LPA role proved too much and as such they have been great for establishing our future needs, I mean with out their use in this role, we’d probably never have thought about getting the LHDs in the first place.
Well I finally found the missing vid, for those of you who have a sence of humor and like a good laugh have a look at this VAW-116 Sunkings Safe Safety Video
I am surprised it wasn’t retired years ago.
Scoot: The French keep changing their mind about when they are going to retire her, she was down here a couple of years ago on a “Farwell” visit that took her all over the world. Then they decided to keep her because they had no other vessel like her in service. This BPC-140 is a nice choice and shuld allow the flexibility and training set out with JdA to be maintained and expaned.
I also remember the Brazilians looking at buying her for their fleet since the Fearless deal fell through.
Perhaps the Canucks could use those in fleet service, at least they’d get some sea time instead of being in the docs all the time.
As for the Rankin Doco, yes I have seen it, I have it on video and that was a great publicity stunt for the RAN, the reality is nothing like what was in this. If you are interestyed in seeing how the RAN really operates a sub, go looking for a doco done on HMAS Otama back in the late 80’s (yes I know it’s old but worth it).
Oops, looks like HMAS Collins has lost something again, if you don’t know which one she is, just follow the trail of nuts and bolts! :dev2:
Actually mate for this role I am not as enthusiastic with the MRC since as you have stated it’s a bit too much for the role.
Infact I think this would be a great opportunity to discuss the merits of the Incat LHT yet again.
This Micro Flat Top has enough room for a good sized training compliment allowing for both Army and Navy flyers to undertake their sea deployment componant at the same time. The vessel could do trips between Jervis Bay and Gold Coast (Oakey Army Aviation Base).
I realise that IX-514 is nothing like this vessel, and the cost between the two is calculable but consider the vast number of pros for the LHT, besides, since it is from an Australian company and will be built in Australia, the cost can easily be reduced.
Great idea for a thread.
Thanks mate, I think I used up this years quota of good ideas.
The BPC-140 is an interesting concept, I’ll have to look it up and study that a bit further. Makes a bucket load of sence to me though. JdA was a fantastic vessel for her time (is one of my favourite vessels of all time as well), and her use as a training vessel has set the standard for other countries around the world.
Something I uncovered recently in the AIR 9000 that has been very hush hush; Down here we are to get a new “Aviation Training Vessel”. This vessel is to be a new autonomous vessel shared by Army and Navy for training of operartions on all RAN vessels. I’ve heard nothing on size or proposals but this BPC-140 looks like it would be ideal should it be offered. Though there is one other local offer I’d really like to see up and running.
I think the main point here has been missed and that is- Does the USN really need ships of that size now? The cold war is over, the fleets of subs and bombers heading in to attack carriers is now nonexistant, thus give up on this class of vessel and produce more of the Advanced Burkes (no not the Zumwalts- the advanced Burkes that are after the Flt 2 design).
As SLL has already stated, the USN has major budget problems and they also have major man power problems (people are leaving by the droves and not being able to be replaced for fear of having to go to the MEAO. On the flip side numbers have increased in the USCG).
Smaller Destroyers are just as capable to carry out the work with the only draw back being less ammo to fling at the bad guys. This circles back to not knowing who the bad guys are anymore and there again smaller vessels are better to deal with this situation than having big CGN’s sitting around using up money and people that could fill other more urgent positions.
Hmmmm that’s different to the info I heard originally Uni, but there again that info was over a year old and we all know how requirements change in weeks let alone years.
One thing I do clearly remember was their insistance on having a rather heavy helo compliment, two helo landing spots but a hanger for upto four (thoughts of the Endeavour class come to mind here). I know that they looked at the Absalon class but decided that they were too small, this is proberbly why Stanflex has made a bigger design for offer.
So in reguards to the Indonesian tubs, how many have they officially got now? I know they wanted four, but IIRC only two have been paid for and one has been delivered.
Sorry mate, no it’s not, I have seen that one, I didn’t think it was as good as the one I’m looking for, thanks for trying though