dark light

Ja Worsley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 3,659 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: First Australian MRH-90 in final assembly. #2549367
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Look at all those tigers ready to go out in that last pic.

    There was a lot of talk about the MRH-90 at the Airshow and everyone was disappointed that NHI didn’t send one down to fly around. The first two are expected to be delivered some time in September or October this year.

    in comparrison she really is a smaller ship than the Seaking that she will replace in Navy service but the fact that it can operate off the back of an Anzac is the huge plus here. 817Sqdn are really looking forward to getting them, they love the Seaking but they know too well that their time is up. These kits IIRC are due to be delivered some time early next year.

    in reply to: Typhoon for the JASDF #2549370
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Swervy old friend, I think you have it in one there mate, talking the company up. But it’s interesting to note that when I spoke to the RAAf guys at the DMO stand in the next hall, about what he said, they just clamed up and asked me who I was, then asked me to move along.

    Did I hit a sore note or something?

    I also met Carlo Kopp, and he and I had a rather long chat about everything. Dispite what he writes, the guy really has done his homework, he showed me a heap of figures on Australia buying the F-35 and their comparison to the F-22, then went on to talk about various other factors like the B747 cargo deal being a better choice over the C-17 but even he had to submit that with the Army buying the M-1A-1 AIm the B747 deal was killed. He did present good logical and logistical arguments as to why he says the stuff he says. Sadly though I had to disagree with him about the pigs staying in service- besides, it was Friday, the hottest day and during heat human tempratures grow and tempers grow shorter so I left it.

    I’m not saying that i’m a convert to his gospel, just that in future i will respect his views but draw my own conclusions knowing that he really does have valid points.

    in reply to: Reactivating the FA2s…. #2549487
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    While at the Airshow I was chatting to the crew of the E-3D that was there (the nav and I became good friends instantly), and they told me that the FA-2’s will never fly again dispite what the popular press report.

    Apparently they have been stripped of mission critical equipment that has found it’s way on board certain other types. SO if the Falklands were invaded again, the Shar’s will not partake in any fun games, Sorry guys.

    in reply to: Typhoon for the JASDF #2549490
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Hi guys, I’m back from the Australian International Airshow and I have some slight news on this topic:

    The LM rep at the show told me that both Australia and Japan would be allowed export versions of the F-22 from Mid 2008 should those countries still be interested in them. He also said that Japan is very interested in them to replace the F-15’s and F-4Kai’s and that they will make no decission untill they get a chance to fly one in about a years time.

    So basically the Typhoon order is bunk, don’t even bother trying to look into it. I agree with what SLL said above there, Wiki need to be more careful about what they are publishing, they might find themselves in hot water over it.

    in reply to: World of Lürssen #2065150
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    MConrads: Mate on the back of the Todak and Commandant al Khattabi classes, are those Emerlec 30’s?

    I’m interested in this gun system if anyone can supply any cutouts and/or pics, basically it’s the last Manned Gun Turret system in the world, thanks to the lovely innovations of computerisation and mechanics, they have all been faded out- but this system still uses the “Man in the Loop” method should primaries go off line.

    in reply to: Mexican Navy Su-27s killed! #2554738
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    If you ask me (and I know you haven’t) the Mexican defence force is in a battle, not only with outside influenceses but between itself. The Navy getting these planes was a “Stick it to them” attitude to the Air Force who have been battleing to get funds for new fighters for years.

    The Navy decided to branch out and take this root because the Air Force is not operational capable to patrol the oil fields as well as the other airspace duties it currently has. The old F-5’s are getting worn down now ad as such the FAM have been watching the global fighter market for the past decade wanting to see what it might be able to afford soon.

    The amount of money the US supplies in Aid is nominal and Mexico has enjoyed a boost in recent times with her exports of Oil, Coal and Copper. Add to this her increase to the tourism sector with many American students crossing the boarder to loose their inhibbitions during Spring Break and you can start to get an idea on how much money they do have.

    I really don’t see Mexico buying second hand planes in the future- just more planes for the air force to cover both current operational demands and projected future demands as successfully outlined by the navy.

    As always on this topic, I will ask my Mexican friend for confirmation on this subject but what I have just written is the most logical sence of the story.

    in reply to: Super Hornet Odds……….. #2555436
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Could the F/A-18XL be fitted with TVC? It would give it great manouverability. Also I thought the Hornets tail’s were slightly angled? Still TVC and No tails would make a rather stealthy plane!

    in reply to: Can you identify this aircraft? #2555439
    Ja Worsley
    Participant
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I think it makes sence, why replace what you’ve lots with what’s not in production already? As for the G’s, well If the E/F’s can’t do the job then perhaps an investigation is needed as to why they were downed in the first place.

    Cutting money from non essential areas is a good thing because it shows that theyb are priortising where the money goes and not just throwing it about. The current administration seems to lack the ability to control monetry flow in the right places, as a result they should be ousted and a more capable government set in place- one that also listens to the people I mean after all, wasn’t that what the whole US government was originally intended for- “A government by the people, of the people, for the people”!

    in reply to: Indonesia's National Corvette / Korvet Nasional #2065390
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Hello? Am I on another planet here? Am I not being understood?

    KRI Diponegoro (365) has started sea trials in the Netherlands, while KRI Hasanuddin (366) has just been launched and is currently fitting out.The other two vessels in the class: KRI Sultan Iskandar (367) and KRI Frans Kaisiepo (368) are still under various stages of construction in the Dutch yard.They are all of the Sigma design and fitted with COTS and MOTS equipment.

    The Korean contract is for something completely different- The Small Destroyers which are just that. If you guys are interested the order of ships goes like this…

    1. Crusiers
    2. Destroyers
    3. Frigates
    4. Corvettes
    5. Gun Boats/ Missiles Boats
    6. Patrol Craft

    Any “Small Destroyer” is more likely to be a Frigate rather than a Corvette simply because of the weapons fit- and yes that is how you determin what is what, Displacement with weapons fit. The best example I can give is the MEKO 360 design; In Argentine service it is a Destroyer because of the heavier weapons fit, conversly in Nigerian service it is only a Frigate!

    in reply to: Super Hornet Odds……….. #2556203
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Tid: mate Tasmania- you’re joking right, I want nothing to do with that tree hugging hippey Bob Brown and living in the same place as him would come down to one thing- “Sorry officer it was self defence, I had to kill him because he was S.itting me to death”! :diablo:

    The movie is coming along very well thanks- After I get back from reporting on the Avalon Airshow we are hitting the filming stage (I hope- still having trouble with a couple of actors).

    Dan: yes the Doctor does seem to think the world is coming to an end everytime the PRC looks at us doesn’t he. Just one point mate, the TNI-AU has four Flankers, two 27’s and two 30’s. Alo the SH’s are only going to be in service for 8 years according to press releases, and then the on slae of these planes will be looked into in order to provide further funds for more F-35’s. Who would buy them is a good question and how much will they pay is a better one. If India opts for the SH’s (A very outside chance here according to sources in India), then there is a good chance that this is where they might go. All this depends though on who is in favour with the US at the time.

    in reply to: HAL HF24 Marut #2556205
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Do a search on the Modern Military section and you’ll see we covered it a while ago- pics, stories, flames (usual Indo/Pak stuff). Interesting plane.

    in reply to: Buran Space Shuttle parked in Bahrain #2556207
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Wow I remember when this thing was in Sydney as part of an exhibition, never did get to see it as I was away most of the time. Rather sad really- I think it would have given the Russians a good going in the Space race.

    in reply to: NH-90 #2556208
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    “That sound” is created by those 2 wide rotor blades, and the UH-1Y and the AH-1Z have a new, narrow, 4-blade rotor.

    Exactly and new engines, thus the sound is completely different, sorry Jase1. Add to this the fact that none are in service yet, as opposed to the NH-90’s which have already started delivery in some countires- ther odds are in favour of the MRH-90 for the Kiwi’s.

    Another thing is the Range, Speed and Payload issues, it would take three UH-1Y’s to deliver the same amount of troops as this machine, IIRC the UH-1Y doesn’t have the range either and the speed is still lacking. Add to this the Fly by Wire controls being far more resilliant to damage compaired to the standard wires and hydraulics of the Huey!

    The Huey has had a great run, 1959 till ?. Guess you could say it is to helicopters as the DC-3 is to planes! Both deserve a spot in the history books.

    in reply to: NH-90 #2556361
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Jase1: Mate you bring a smile to my face with what you have just said. I have heard for a few years now that Australia is looking at a joint co-habbitation and ecconomic partnership such as the likes of the EU, only this deal includes Australia, New Zeraland and the PNG. Now whilest the PNG have opted not to discuss any such co-operation, our kiwi cousins have been far more responcive about the idea (why do you think you guys are now in our NRL games and Basketball games). The deal is said to be more about creating not so much an Eight state of Australia- not at all, but creating a new ecconomic power country called Oceania.

    The defence co-operation is one part (and the most relavant when speaking here), but it’s more than this. No one is asking either the Aussies or the Kiwis to give up their national identity, but more along the lines of what we are seeing in Europe these days with “Joint Forces” being a seperate issue along side national forces.

    You and I should have a few chats via PM or IM mate, sounds like we could learn alot from each other!

    As for your point on the Hueys, I can see it, but I can’t agree with it- knowing the RNDF as I do, the MRH-90 is going to last a very very long time in it’s service (I seriously would be suprised if they don’t get up to 50 years out of it). The main thing with the UH-1Y is that it is at the end of it’s life growth potential as opposed to the MRH-90 which is at the start of it. This was the same deal with why we chose the Tiger over the Apache, the AH-64 is already into it’s development cycle as opposed to the Tiger which has just started.

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 3,659 total)