dark light

Ja Worsley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 3,659 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PLAAN v/s IN 10 years down the line #2067365
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I was just reading a piece that says that China’s carrier air wing maybe further ahead than originally thought! Thought they don’t know what planes will eventually serve on the carriers, there is a seculation that they have a plane that is a combination between the S-3 Viking and the failed Yak 44 for the AEW role.

    Speculation still surrounds the type of fighter that will be used but more and more people are leaning towards the Su-33 in which Chinese officials have had a keen interest in for some time!

    As for who will have the better force projection in a decade, that’s simple, you khave to just look at what is in service now and what is being built now. India can’t get itself organised and would rather squabble over prices of equipment from other countires. China just gets in there and builds things, most of which they produce the parts for anyway, so the answer already lays with China

    Sadly I agree tghat this is a pointless thread and that you are only fishing for a fight, stop it please

    in reply to: PRINCIPE DE ASTURIAS pics! #2067375
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Fantasitc pics, pitty there are none of the actual ship it’self and also a pitty that they take up so much time to d/l on a dial up system

    in reply to: Remembering the Greats: Blohm + Voss BV 222 Wiking (Viking) #1360684
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Chick: Mate if that’s true it goes to show how little fore thought was in evidence after the Allies won the war, I mean they basically destroyed a heck of a lot of good planes, ships and other weapons all in the name of wiping out a bad memory. Some of the best battleships went to an aweful grave during Atomic testing in the pacific all so that the boffins could prove that their theories worked. It’s just not fair is it?

    in reply to: Remembering the Greats: Blohm + Voss BV 222 Wiking (Viking) #1366512
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Pete: Mate no plans are around that I know of to raise any aircraft, as mentioned above, it’s doubtfull that any are in a good condition to be resurected.

    As for the Diesel engines, you’d probably have come acorss the same reasons I have for having such engines: That is to enable them to be refueled from U boats.

    in reply to: Remembering the Greats: Blohm + Voss BV 222 Wiking (Viking) #1366838
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Thanks for the input guys.

    DHFan: that wasn’t very nice of him, guess it proves that this was a plane worth keeping secret even after the war was over.

    DaveM2: Any ideas if there is an exact location on either of these? I have a “Commando Comic” (I’m a collector) that mentions an attack by SBS forces in Norway on a Wiking base, perhaps this is where the story came from? Another Comic mentions one flying to Canada on a secret mission to capture Sonar Boffins, interesting if true.

    Tex and Jager: whilest searching for these pics I came across the Revel model, yes it is huge and if i ever find one I will not hesitate in buying it, but this was small compared to the next plane that B+V were to produce, I’ll dig up the site again and show those pics. Personally I find all flying boats facinating aircraft and my favourite is without a doubt the B+V 138.

    Charley: I have hear about the Liberator battle IIRC the entire crew received the Knights Cross 2nd Class for their actions and became the only flying boat crew in the entire war to gain the highest military honour their country could bestow upon them.

    in reply to: Remembering the Greats: Blohm + Voss BV 222 Wiking (Viking) #1367258
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Did any of these planes servive?

    in reply to: Australian Submarines #2069241
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Well there were more noise problems than just that one, let see how good my memory is!

    ———————————————————————————-
    The Seven balded prop used to cause cavitation noise if it went above 7kts

    The Periscope rattled when trying to use it at PD

    The Engines made a huge amount of noise due to the fact that the Rubber stoppers that they rested on either were never put in or had deteriorated due to the amount of vibration the engines produced

    Finally the computers made a rather loude hum for some strange reason

    ———————————————————————————-
    Of all these problems (including the water flow as mentioned above), only the computer noise is yet to be fixed. The RAN has announced that with the new ADCAP torps will come a new computer system and this will be noise tested before installation.

    in reply to: Australian Submarines #2069659
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    No they don’t, originally they were to get them, but the probelms chewed up the upgrade money so as a result we won’t get the VLS nor the TLAMS

    in reply to: Australian Submarines #2069723
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Well if you want an honest oppinion from someone who served aboard one of them I’ll be happy to tell you what I know.

    Most of the teething problems have now been sorted out, HMAS Collins is due to re-enter the fleet soon after having been handed back to ASC for fixing of the main problems (from the third boat on these probems were taken in hand on the production line- these being called “Fast Track” subs- only the first two, Collins and Farncombe experienced the infoamous problems). AIP and TLAM tubes have been given away but we are adding ADCAP to the class, this should make them a lot more potent in the region.

    Apart from that, the class is coming along, finally. The other major intergration is going well as well- that of placing women on board subs (I knew the first woman to be accepted for Sub duty, it’s all she had wanted to do).

    As for a battle between China and Australia, I would have to favour the home ground as we have the better boats now, especially after the upgrades

    in reply to: Israel submarine launched strategic cruise missile? #2069900
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    just how good was the Popeye test?

    in reply to: South African Navy News #2070009
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    When are their 209’s due to enter service? Personally I think they too too long in getting the new subs, sure there was the lifting of sanctions and all that but they had the green light a while ago.

    in reply to: Rifling question… #2070293
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    You’re on the right track Mark, the faster the spin the more stabalised the shot and thus the further it can travel and do more damage.

    Some guns have a smooth bore which decreases the friction when the shot travels down the barrel. Certain shots also are fired from non rifled guns (rocket assisted shots, fin stabalised shots ect), though I haven’t heard of these being used by a navy, US Army ravine patrol craft in Vietnam did use them and I think that quallifies here.

    in reply to: [Battlefield 2: Special Forces] Vis-ident this submarine? #2070347
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    yeah they have a very distinctive look don’t they

    in reply to: argentinetian type 42s #2070354
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Well all I know is what is reported in Jane’s guys and they have said that both are to return to sea. As the report said, the RN are now selling the spares to Argentina since they are deemed old news and no longer a threat.

    Some of the older Type 42’s will be retiring soon anyway as the RN cuts back it’s fleet for much needed funds in their new projects (Astute, CVF, Type 45)

    in reply to: argentinetian type 42s #2070933
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Well I don’t know about you guys but I recently heard in Jane’s that Both Type 42’s are getting refitted and returing to full active service. The UK has finally decided to sell parts to Argentina (viewing the sale as old and antiquated equipment by modern standards). Thus both Hercules and Santisima Trinidad will be back in service by 2008 for a minimum of 15 years.

    As for the Lynx, yes they did have two, both (type 23’s) were sold as part of the weapons systems of the ships. One crashed killing the crew the other was later sold to Denmark becoming S-035. Here’s a link to a pic I found and posted on the board here: Argentine Lynx.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 3,659 total)