dark light

EN830

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 4,978 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The (even more) merged Vulcan thread once again. #1269371
    EN830
    Participant

    No, it’s called a “tax write-off”.

    And your problem with this is ????

    Do you mind if I answer you in English ?

    Why ya think Kermit Weeks buy so many aircraft? His accoutant told him “loose $6million a year”… & Kermit is on record as saying exactly that. Why ya think he based his museum in the middle of Hurricane Alley?

    If he was interested in perserving the aircaft he would have put his collcetion somewhere helluva lot safer…..

    So he has no interest in the excellent collection that I had the pleasure of viewing last year. And judging by the enthusiastic talk he gave to the gathered audience about the aircraft and the plans he has for the site, he has no real interest in the collection. And judging by the display he put on in the P40 after his talk, he has no interest in flying any of his collection either.

    A case of brain not being engaged before adding to a thread I think !!!!

    in reply to: The (even more) merged Vulcan thread once again. #1269419
    EN830
    Participant

    I’ve always found lunches on expenses (especially other peoples) taste so much better.

    Am I alone in this?

    Andy

    No AiB, I agree whole heartedly.

    It’s common practice here to entertain a client, settle the bill and then add it to their invoice as a disbursement.

    in reply to: The (even more) merged Vulcan thread once again. #1271056
    EN830
    Participant

    Can I suggest that you approach Sharwoods ????

    in reply to: The (even more) merged Vulcan thread once again. #1271068
    EN830
    Participant

    On a lighter note, AIB hows the Indian fund going 😉

    TT

    So well that he has set up an offshore charitable trust and account to hold the funds 🙂

    in reply to: The (even more) merged Vulcan thread once again. #1271106
    EN830
    Participant

    I’m sure that the Lawyers and Accountants, given the task of winding up the project and disposing of the assets will be eternally grateful for your contributions.

    My money will be going to the Old Warden Collection and to aid the Blenheim Restoration.

    in reply to: The (even more) merged Vulcan thread once again. #1271123
    EN830
    Participant

    Isn’t sponsorship exactly the same as an advertising campaign?

    Regards,

    John.

    OK

    So how many people have changed their bank accounts to HSBC, because they have their logo on the side of the Grace Spitfire, or started drinking Red Bull because a Sea Vixen is painted in their colours, not many I would guess. So in fact very little return would be gleaned. It’s product awareness, but to a very limited audience.

    However when HSBC run an ad campaign on prime time TV saying that they are offering cut priced mortgages, people take notice. The same goes for Red Bull running a campaign extolling the benefits of their soft drinks. They would expect some form of return against the expense of running these campaigns, such as an increase in sales or mortgage customers.

    Considering that the Vulcan would only be able to attend a very limited number of shows, due to the cost of operating it, product exposure to any potential sponsor would be very limited.

    in reply to: The (even more) merged Vulcan thread once again. #1271191
    EN830
    Participant

    I have to agree, sponsorship is an investment requiring a return.

    No it isn’t, sponsorship is getting a company’s name up in lights, associated with a particular event and hopefully benefitting from the exposure. It’s not quite the same as an advertising campaign, to which a company requires some form of return or increase in sales.

    in reply to: The (even more) merged Vulcan thread once again. #1272126
    EN830
    Participant

    if i remember right info from 558 club member a while ago the project had 1.6 million
    the plane and the spares cost 125k and addditional fees around 300k when the lottery came on board they only had 150k left where as the other 1 million gone alas we will never know

    Surely they should be producing or will have to produce accounts if the project is wound up. I guess the Lottery Commission would have requested some form of accounts and business plan before committing.

    Looking at the Charities Commission Website helps.

    http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/registeredcharities/showcharity.asp?remchar=&chyno=1101948

    F/Y 01 Aug 2003 to 31 July 2004 Income £444,465, Expenditure £200,158
    http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/registeredcharities/ScannedAccounts%5CEnds48%5C0001101948_AC_20040731_001_01_E_C.pdf
    F/Y 01 Aug 2004 to 31 July 2005 Income £1,092,081 Expenditure £839,575

    It also lists the Trustees, which would be ultimately responsible for the distribution of the funds.

    in reply to: The (even more) merged Vulcan thread once again. #1272163
    EN830
    Participant

    Next project…. An airworthy TSR2?

    Nope, we have Concorde before the TSR2

    in reply to: Tigercat to leave Duxford? #1273231
    EN830
    Participant

    Moving aircraft around, selling out or buying in refreshes the line up, the other option would be continuous repetition and shows that are basically stagnant.

    But there again, not long ago, someone not too far away from this thread was advocating loosing many of the present day line up and having a show purely and “Simply” PBY/Catalina, now that would be interesting and yawn inducing.

    in reply to: What's YOUR Fantasy Legends??! #1285448
    EN830
    Participant

    How about as many Catalinas as the organisers can lay there hands on. .

    So we have the longest one type show in the world, yep I guess that would be a crowd puller. Certainly would take all weekend for them to form up, and the tailchase would last into the next week. The video would be a hit with the insomniacs

    no camp outs on the flightline,

    Can’t say I saw many tents out around the flightline walk this year, maybe they were obscured by the all those annoying aircraft. Or are you referring to those display pilots who walk with light step, wear high heals and have a hand shake like a wet kipper?

    I would actualy like to see some of the Legendary tanks drive down the flightline before the show satarts

    That’ll put paid to the tents.

    free entrance

    So no revenue to go towards keeping these old aircraft in the air. I suppose it would stop the freeloading as there wouldn’t be an airshow for long.

    flightline walks where you can walk right up to the aeroplanes like at Old Warden

    Mind the tents though.

    No press,

    No potential for gratis plugging of the event

    no annoying speeker poles or french commentators

    While we’re doing away with the Poles and Frogs, why not the cheques as well as you advocate free entrance.

    no annoying small kids running around your feet pretending to be a Spitfire

    There goes the future of aviation. Though the children running around ones feet at Legends would be far more accommodating than the mop haired fool who crashed through a stall during a poignant ceremony at OW earlier this year.

    decant food

    How else would you distribute it, if it isn’t decanted.

    no step ladders

    What would we have to moan about if they do away with the step ladders

    not such a damm long walk to the food stalls and toilets.

    Lets place them on the flightline next to the tents

    A good safe flying display with lots of pyrotechnics would be nice

    Well it will certainly be safe with only a couple of Catalina’s trundling around the airfield, they could hand out free packs of sparklers.

    . And someone please hide that damm American air museum and tank museum.

    Would everyone on arrival at Duxford please take a shovel and a bucket each and start digging.

    in reply to: What's YOUR Fantasy Legends??! #1286166
    EN830
    Participant

    Include the Utterly Butterly’s in the display

    in reply to: Spitfires in WWII Germany? #1288549
    EN830
    Participant

    Someone’s alias is a German Spitfire’s serial.

    I wonder who that could be ?

    A couple of images of EN830 in German hands:-

    http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c131/en830/Misc/EN830col.gif

    Thanks to Gaël Elégoét

    http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c131/en830/Misc/Hdbspit_2.jpg

    in reply to: Who flew what at Legends?? #1292259
    EN830
    Participant

    Charlie Brown BM597

    in reply to: Picture Help #1295378
    EN830
    Participant

    Thanks for the input chaps, the picture had been sold for £150.00 before I got there.

    There was also a small water colour of a Defiant in night fighter colours, with at least 25 signatures, they wanted £100 for that.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 4,978 total)