I just can’t get my head around people who do this. I am not a wealthy person by any means, but I wouldn’t be able to bring myself to sell them, they’d have to go to a national museum. That said, it’s their business, and I would expect that Mr Brown gave the family his blessing to dispose of them. Hopefully, a philanthropist will buy them and do the right thing.
As above, I look in every time I see an update 🙂 There will be way more people looking at this thread and appreciating it than you think.
F16 takes this in pretty much every regard. It was easily the best of the 4th gens, and with updates it is proving to be comparable to the Gripen (though not quite as good, IMO)
The Mirage takes it in the looks category though 🙂 Unfortunate that one of the best looking aircraft lines of all time (Mirage) was replaced by such an ugly one (Rafale).
Am I right in assuming that a succesfull flight of this one will make the road to a flying Tempest easier?
I should think that getting a Napier Sabre engine ready for flight is going to require a lot of bespoke engineering work and parts production, and at least some reverse engineering. Whoever does this first will naturally make this process easier for those who follow. Isn’t Kermit Weeks intending to have an airworthy Sabre engined Tempest? No doubt both the British and Canadian projects can benefit from this.
but most fighting of today and tomorrow will probably be medium and long range. so the tvc of pak-fa is not as special. that is why US and China stopped with tvc and why the US 6th gen fighter are all interceptors.
It wasn’t that long ago that the US made a similar assumption, and sent F4 Phantoms into combat with no guns. Making such an assumption was as stupid then as it would be now.
“One day I hope to put one together as a flyer and I intend to use one as a static for an immersion environment”
The more I read about Mr Weeks, the more I get the impression that ‘Fantasy’ of Flight is an apt name for his museum. Yes, he does a of of good for the warbird community, and does restore and fly a lot of types, but he is also a serial hoarder, and there’s no way he will ever get round to doing half the aircraft in his collection (Looking firmly at this B29, his Lancaster, and the Sunderland). Surely while he is complaining about struggling to make money at his exhibit, he would be better off reducing his collection, and using the funds to concentrate on things he can realistically get done.
A few pics I took a few years ago. She’s an impressive beast in the flesh, especially on the rare occasions she sees daylight 😎







That’s beautiful 😎
The wording of the referendum act did quite clearly say it is an advisory referendum 🙂 Of course, the government pledged to implement the result, so we must leave. But, even as a leave voter, I see the need for parliamentary scrutiny of the deal. The government can set out their aims without ‘showing all the cards’.
However, much of this resistance has blatantly nothing to do with parliamentary democracy. Committed remoaners are attempting to water down Brexit as much as possible, and they should be kept in check.
although I firmly believe that it has been a net benefit for the UK in recent years.
By which measure?
Financially? perhaps. Unfortunately the figures always fail to mention the costs to infrastructure, and the current infrastructure shortfall + required investment. And as the NHS up and down the country hasn’t been recording the country of origin for so many of these people, there’s no way of knowing for sure how much that is costing. Then there’s the prison system demographics, which are quite frankly, shocking. Not as bad as the French mind, where their ‘cultural enrichment’ has resulted in a certain minority group (10% of their population) making up 70% of the prison population. And most certainly, the poorest in our society don’t benefit from a saturated labour pool.
What of the environmental impact? I don’t have an issue with immigration in principle, and certainly appreciate the contribution migrants make to our public services. I suspect a lot of leave voters are the same. What I have an issue with is overpopulation, exacerbated by record net migration, resulting in England being one of the most densely populated major countries in the world. Seemingly, only solution is the permanent destruction of so many habitats that are rich in unique plant and animal life.
So what, exactly, is the net benefit of mass immigration? Propping up our ponzi scheme of an NHS? increasing the profit margins of large multinationals? I fail to see any tangible benefit to the average person, and can think of so many legitimate downsides.
One advantage of CGI is that film makers can use this technique to show types of aircraft that no longer exist or where there are no airworthy examples left in the world. I for one appreciated the albeit brief appearance of the CG Dornier 17 in “The Imitation Game”.
And the appearance of a Beaufighter in the 3rd installment of ‘the Mummy’ trilogy, even if it made no sense at all. Shame the rest of the film was so terrible.
![]()
![]()

I’m not entirely sure what a Neoliberal is. Its a term bandied around a lot of late, but gets used to describe anyone right of Jeremy Corbyn, and Left of Nigel Farage.
Basically someone who promotes a race to the bottom with the motivation of lining their own pockets. Living standards, society, the environment etc be damned. They often pretend to be socialist, but would privatise the NHS in a heartbeat if it made them £1 a month better off.
Jza
The arrogance of your sort is astounding. There is life on this planet we haven’t even seen yet let alone catalogued, studied and attempted to slaughter.
Go west from the Urals you’ll see no human for days even weeks until you close on the Pacific coast. Huge areas of the North American continent the same. The Amazon the same. There are regions on this planet where, if you found yourself unprepared, you would be killed by a very cold and unconcerned nature and your body, like as not, would never be seen again.
Where abouts IN ENGLAND is that, exactly? I don’t remember us having a referendum on the Urals membership of the European Union.
This gets funnier and funnier. Now you can have independence without wealth and that’s what 17 million of you believe.
You were leading the world recovery. Now you are an unfathomable source of global amusement. You have a declining manufacturing sector, prices already rising and no political will to change that and fix the problems you yourselves have caused.
Your currency has crashed and it’s achieved nothing of value as your exports are mostly high end items that sell on quality not price.
You will go from global power to the proudest man in the soup kitchen. The amusement will be seeing how you try and make it someone else’s fault when your 17 million people realise what they’ve done!. The first step will be when the questions go unanswered as to why you aren’t richer when you leave as you were promised. That’s when the real comedy will begin.
Many of us would gladly become poorer to try and conserve what little of our green areas we have left.
As for you, I hope you and your fellow neoliberals are content with your unimaginable wealth when your children are living in a barren concrete wasteland, devoid of all non human life.
As far as I’m concerned, you neolibs are worse than ISIS. Certainly much worse for the planet.
So, you vote for Brexit, and destroy confidence in your economy in order to not have to give foreigners your money.
Actually, it shows that a majority value self determination and national accountability over money. As you appear to know the cost of brexit, but not the value of it, I assume you are blind to this.
Here’s a clue why many, including myself, voted leave:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/23/uk-population-grew-half-million-net-migration-ons
But sure, scream racist instead if these issues are beyond your limited comprehension.