dark light

j_jza80

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,978 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Two Mark One Spitfires changing owners soon #925607
    j_jza80
    Participant

    *to do list*

    Win Euromillions before July 19th.

    j_jza80
    Participant

    But that is where you assume that the only mission that is of importance to the Swiss should be air policing (which wasn’t the Typhoon’s strongest suit anyway as evaluations pointed out) and not any other type of mission, whereas the Swiss Govt. and its Air Force have every right (some would say duty) to prepare for the worst scenario and hope that they never need to perform any other mission other than air policing.

    Does that mean they should sacrifice interceptor capabilities they would regularly use, in favour of ground attack ones they would most likely never use?

    j_jza80
    Participant

    And you know Switzerland’s needs more than the Swiss Air Force? They set up an evaluation of all 3 types based on THEIR assessment of their needs, and found that the Rafale was the best fit for them. I can’t imagine how anyone would question their evaluation which was considered fair and transparent and conducted to see how each competitor performed missions that the Swiss Air Force ALREADY conducts. the Typhoon came second and that’s that. It doesn’t fit Swiss needs better than the Rafale. The competent authorities don’t believe so.

    Procurement programs are blundered all the time. Sometimes accidentally, sometimes not.

    It is no great secret that as an interceptor, Typhoon is in a different league to Rafale.

    j_jza80
    Participant

    A German, French, or Italian threat is more plausible than any of the other bogeymen one might conjure up to justify a fast jet capability for SwAF.

    It is also a small nation in a benign security environment, with correspondingly limited military spending and, within that limited budget, many other requirements that need to be addressed as dictated by the nation’s strategic geography as a small nation bordered by larger powers on all sides. As such, Switzerland must exercise far more prudence in defence matters than, for example, the UK — a large nation having borders with nobody.

    we aren’t in the 1930’s now, there is no danger of Switzerland being annexed by their neighbours.

    And being landlocked has some significant advantages for defence. No expensive Navy for example.

    j_jza80
    Participant

    It would be foolish for Switzerland to buy Rafale or Typhoon as the supporting nations France, Germany, and Italy are the most likely to present a threat. Gripen is much safer.

    Utter nonsense

    Not if it’s grounded because it’s too expensive to fly.

    As above. Switzerland is one of the wealthiest nations in the world.

    You don’t like the West much, do you?! 😀

    in reply to: Mediums: best compromise or worst? #2206722
    j_jza80
    Participant

    EU is too poor and too deficient in industrial capacity/training too fight a strike war. Russian tanks can still fight under protection of upgraded MIG-29/Su-27 and mobile airdefence systems.

    I will even predict Saudi/Israel/UAE/Qatar far more important than EU. thats how wealth concentration changed. Ruaf need to deal with former and the later will automatically fall in line.

    You do realize that Europe is BY FAR the wealthiest continent in the world?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_continents_by_GDP_%28nominal%29

    That may change, but it will still be a long time off.

    j_jza80
    Participant

    As above. Given the intended duties of the aircraft, Typhoon is probably the best aircraft in the world for that role. And I can see why Gripen would be considered on the cost basis. But I don’t understand how Rafale even gets a look in here (it is no doubt a superb aircraft, but not as suited to Switzerland’s needs as Typhoon), and the Super Bug even more so. Surely F15 or f16 would be more suited?

    in reply to: Holy crap they've got a Harrier live #926031
    j_jza80
    Participant

    I would like to think that one day we will see a UK based Harrier on the airshow circuit.

    It must surely rank as one of the all time great British aircraft 😎

    in reply to: HAC's Hawker Fury flies again #927076
    j_jza80
    Participant

    Great shot 😎 You can see some Hurricane in the design from that angle 🙂

    in reply to: Another Shackleton in danger? #846677
    j_jza80
    Participant

    Do they still have a Spitfire there? MK.21 IIRC.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #846935
    j_jza80
    Participant

    The B25 looks spectacular in those colours!

    in reply to: Today I lost a friend. #383558
    j_jza80
    Participant

    Blue skies

    in reply to: New Typhoon in historic colours #846948
    j_jza80
    Participant

    I wonder what a 109E scheme will look like on a Luftwaffe Typhoon !

    I think we can assume the tail will be bare 😀

    in reply to: New Typhoon in historic colours #846983
    j_jza80
    Participant

    I thought they’d go with something pretty half hearted like they did with last years invasion stripes, but this looks fantastic. 🙂

    Reminds me of the special scheme one of the retiring Harriers wore.

    in reply to: General Discussion #270667
    j_jza80
    Participant

    😀

    But they are all rotten.

    For the first time since I have been eligible, I am not going to vote. I’m no longer going to endorse a system that seems to elevate some of the very worst in our society to the top, and give them huge salaries, multiple homes etc. Some of them even have the audacity to believe that being an MP isn’t a full time job!

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,978 total)