dark light

OneLeft

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 1,009 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BA Gatwick 737 Fleet #523357
    OneLeft
    Participant

    There has been a smattering of A319s in particular operating routes out of LGW for some time. Usually Scottish Shuttles, but they do make the odd foray into Europe and I presume therefore Jersey too.

    There were 2 A319’s at any given time based at LGW for a period a year or more back. They operated specific routes, MAN and GVA being where the flight crew would change over aircraft on night-stops. The aircraft also operated EDI and ABZ and IIRC MAD (certainly something European). Almost certain JER did not feature in the Airbus programme.

    1L.

    in reply to: BA Gatwick 737 Fleet #523385
    OneLeft
    Participant

    BA has already placed an order for 14 Airbus A320 to replace the 737-300/500 fleet based at LGW.

    To be precise BA has ordered A320’s to replace the A319’s from LHR which will replace the B737-300/500’s at LGW.

    EN830, the Airbus used to fly to JER from LHR, but as far as I know not from LGW, where it was originally ATR then RJ op by CityFlyer, then B737 op by BA.

    I haven’t heard when the A319’s are off to LGW, but I’ll see if I can find out.

    1L.

    in reply to: Gatwick 17:35 BST yesterday – A "classic" departure #524210
    OneLeft
    Participant
    in reply to: Plane on conveyor, would it take off ? — HELP!! #524687
    OneLeft
    Participant

    so surely all that would happen is you’d have the aircraft moving at 160kts one way and the belt moving at 160kts the other? The wheels are free moving so surely there’s no direct relationship between the speed of the conveyor and the actual speed of the aircraft?

    I think I’ve got you Paul. You mean the belt would do 160kts one way, the aircraft 160kts the other, the wheels would do 320kts, and the aircraft would take off as normal just with the wheels spinning faster than is usual for an aircraft doing 160kts. Yes?

    In which case I guess you are describing what might actually happen, whereas I am reading a theoretical situation and question as to whether an aircraft prevented from moving forward by a conveyer type runway going the opposite way would still take off with no forward movement.

    Let the debate continue…

    1L.

    in reply to: Plane on conveyor, would it take off ? — HELP!! #524833
    OneLeft
    Participant

    The lift for an aircraft is provided by the flow of air around the wing as it moves forward down the runway. If it is standing still, albeit with it’s wheels spinning on a conveyer type runway, there is no forward movement, hence no lift, hence no take off..

    1L.

    in reply to: Unexpected visitors at Glasgow 05-06-07 #471365
    OneLeft
    Participant

    That’s the first time I’ve seen one of the ex Bacon ERJ’s in FlyBE colours!

    I saw that one at MAN the other day, so keep a look out. It was parked in a row with one in BA titles and another in BA Connect titles. Talk about a record of company history. The things you see when you don’t have a camera.

    I’d like FlyBE to paint one up in full livery, just so we can see what might have been. Don’t imagine that’ll happen though.

    1L.

    in reply to: Flybe Fokker 50 #524852
    OneLeft
    Participant

    They also have 2 F100’s from SunAdria, a B732 from EAC and a Bae146 from WDL on various short-term leases. I believe these are to cover late deliveries from Embraer.

    Althought they seem to have a surplus of aircraft from the BA Connect fleet I guess not many of these have the required capacity to cover for the late 195’s.

    1L.

    in reply to: LHR Late 70's #524857
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Dont forget much of the autoland equipment on BEA/BA TriStars came from the good old Trident.:)

    Something ex-Trident crew tell us every time we fly in foggy conditions.
    “Of course when we were on the Trident…”
    😉

    1L.

    in reply to: G-BOAB @ LHR #525467
    OneLeft
    Participant

    I’ve been asking around at work and as far as I can establish she has been moved because of the nearby building work, apparently she was getting very dirty because of the dust. The intention is to move her back to the same spot in due course.

    I would love to see her on a “fake” stand at T5, somewhere it can be viewed normally.

    Now that’s the best suggestion I’ve heard. Done as though she’s on stand waiting for her next flight.

    1L.

    in reply to: Hi all….:) #525470
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Hello PLYM-SW,

    Welcome to the forum. I’m afraid I’m no help with the photography, but I wanted to say hello anyway. I look forward to seeing your work.

    1L.

    in reply to: Bristol Lulsgate Sunday Evening #472022
    OneLeft
    Participant

    C yas tommz

    I’m getting old!

    1L.

    in reply to: passport for ireland #525590
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Tommy,

    Do you mean from the point of view of the Immigration Authorities?

    If so I think I am right in saying you don’t need a passport to travel between UK and Ireland.

    Of course as Adam says a passport is the perfect thing for the photo id needed by airlines.

    1L.

    in reply to: Manchester to South Africa – BA FIRST Class #408212
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Mark,

    Great report. Good to hear you had such a good time on your flights, and it’s always good to hear good experiences of BA. You can imagine with an airline as big as BA, people are often quick to criticise, but I genuinely believe that most (although admittedly not all) of my crew colleagues do a good job.

    One tip for the next time, the “Shaun Hill’s rhubarb tart with ginger sauce and vanilla ice cream” is the single best thing I’ve ever eaten onboard one of our aircraft.

    1L.

    in reply to: New Flybe Logoprop #526994
    OneLeft
    Participant

    The slogan is quite straightforward, it’s the the colourscheme I have a problem with! I think it’s the way the blue and green clash so perfectly!

    Think of all the beautiful shades of green there are in nature (which is after all what it’s representing) and they choose that one.

    Still I suppose it’s no worse than the Mansion 146 logojet.

    1L.

    in reply to: LGW-NCL Jet2 #526998
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Airlines are like any service industry… it depends (from both points of view) who you get. Every airline has great crew, average crew and lousy crew… every customer has their own wants, needs and opinions.

    Let us know how you get on Dave. I’ll be interested to hear as living near LGW I’ll probably use LS when I visit family in NCL.

    they are alot better then BA

    Now then! What’s your problem mate? 😉

    1L.

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 1,009 total)