dark light

OneLeft

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 1,009 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pembo's random news & views (24/01/06) #560207
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Pembo,

    you should be on 319’s for both of your flights on Thursday.

    Quite a lot of the 757 flying at the moment is on domestic routes, including some NCL and ABZ flights. I suppose though with a handful of 757’s and a huge fleet of A319/320’s the law of averages means that most flights will be on Airbus.

    1L.

    in reply to: Flyglobespan want 10 widebodies, and online check-in! #561438
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Online check-in ? Whats the advantage of that in a “holiday airline” ?

    The same as for any other airline…

    Get passenger to do the check-in agents job from home…
    Get rid of check-in agent…
    Save money.

    Self service check-in has nothing to do with customer service from the airlines point of view. Except from a marketing point of view of course.

    1L.

    in reply to: Why crash upright? #566942
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Spot on explanation rdc1000.

    1L.

    in reply to: Ryanair bans three passengers for stealing life-jackets #568114
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Now for some trivia; Ryanair new aircraft deliveries don’t have lifejackets under the seats so where are they? Have a guess. 🙂

    I’m guessing in a compartment in the PSU (overhead panel) the same as on DBA 737’s.

    1L.

    in reply to: Santa's Christmas thread #600376
    OneLeft
    Participant

    OneLeft‘s Aurigny RJ100 🙂

    Thanks for that, looks great.

    This is probably my last time online before Christmas as I am off to Scotland later on, so I’d like to wish you and yours a great time at Christmas, and a very happy 2006.

    Have fun,
    1L.

    in reply to: A question for the Airbus devotees #601754
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Bmused and Softlad are right, that is what they are for.

    The only airline I’ve worked for that included them in their evacuation drill was Excalibur. All of the others felt that it would waste time during an evacuation setting them up. I’m inclined to agree.

    On Excalibur aircraft the ropes were kept in the very narrow locker above the overwing exits not built into the exit frames. No other aircraft I’ve worked on, including other airline’s 319/320 aircraft have had any ropes fitted for this use. It always seemed especially strange to me that Airbus bothered with this as the 320 family has an off-wing slide.

    1L.

    in reply to: Ryanair Latvia #601762
    OneLeft
    Participant

    No probs Phil, we all have them.

    Does your name suggest that you live somewhere near me and West Sussex Aerodrome?

    1L.

    in reply to: Santa's Christmas thread #602256
    OneLeft
    Participant

    What about an Aurigny RJ100 in the latest aurigny.com billboard scheme?

    1L.

    in reply to: Ryanair Latvia #602260
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Hey Phil, chill out. The guys are just expressing their understanding of the question I asked.

    Anyone would think that we were attacking you personally the way you are replying.

    Relax. Oh and thanks for your replies.

    1L.

    in reply to: FlyBe to start charging for Baggage #602651
    OneLeft
    Participant

    The “council estate” thing was just a joke based on the oft-used and well known Southwest version I also included later on – sorry if anyone was offended.

    Absolutely! Although I still contend that low-fare carriers have made the flying experience less pleasant overall.

    Having said that, I stick by my comments about low-fare carriers. Whilst they may be good for most of the travelling public, the drive for lower and lower fares has been at the expense of the staff who work in the industry. Erosion in terms and conditions that low-fare carriers have applied to their own staff (and by consequence of needing to compete, the staff of other airlines), has turned the airline industry overall into a far less pleasant place to work.

    Think of all the complaints from farmers over the price reduction demands made by companies like Tesco – Tesco want to give customers low prices for items like meat and milk, so they make demands on farmers that result in it being difficult for them to make money. Same principal applies with low fare-carriers. Next time you buy a flight for next to nothing, remember its the staff who “handle” you through your journey who have a less pleasant working life than was the case before the low-fare sector caught on.

    This latest innovation by FlyBe will be another change than impinges on staff for the worse – there will be far more arguments at checkin over paying for baggage, and far more problems for cabin crew who will inevitably be forced to work out how to stow all the extra carry-ons in the limited cabin storage space on a packed DHC-8. Remember its not the poor sods who have to deal with irate customers who have brought in these innovations. Nothing, repeat NOTHING, like this would be introduced unless those at the top of the tree believe that they can either (a) save money/decrease costs or (b) make more money, as a result of the change. It is they who make the decisions, but it is the staff at the sharp end who have to deal with the fall out and the crap.

    Andy

    Every word absolutely correct Andy. Well said.

    1L.

    in reply to: FlyBe to start charging for Baggage #603297
    OneLeft
    Participant

    “Another full Ryanair/easyJet/Jet2/bmiBaby/FlyBe* flight, another deserted council estate”

    I was brought up on council estates and I laughed my a** off!

    I work in the airline business and havnt meat anyone who says LCCS have ruined the airline industry.

    That may be because you work for a handling agent rather than an airline and came to the industry after the advent of LCC’s. I don’t agree that LCC’s have been bad for passengers, but I don’t know anyone who has been within the industry for any length of time and who doesn’t think it has become a worse place to work as direct a result of LCC’s.

    As for the original point of the thread I can see where FlyBe are coming from, paying for the services you use and encouraging people to carry their own bags. However I think it will be short lived as the aircraft in their fleet are hopeless for handluggage and they simply won’t be able to cope with the amount of handluggage people will want to take onboard as a result. Then you get into the ‘well I wanted to take it onboard so I’m not paying’ arguement.

    1L.

    in reply to: Landor messes up another livery: Transavia #604058
    OneLeft
    Participant

    You have to remember that compared with the rest of Europe the Dutch are very laid back, cool and fun loving.

    Compared with the drawings at the beginning of the thread, the actual photograph makes the livery look like a bit of a non-event.

    The cabin is a bit loud in the drawing, but presumably like the livery it will be a bit quieter in the flesh.

    I’d love the uniforms if they weren’t in Transavia’s bright green. I’d far rather have a rugby shirt than the shirt, tie and waistcoat I have to wear every day.

    1L.

    in reply to: Great A380 picture #605240
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Nice shot, but still an ugly aircraft IMO.

    1L.

    in reply to: Virgin Atlantic #606681
    OneLeft
    Participant

    I think it is interesting that nobody has mentioned the Vickers Viscounts which operated in VS colours inthe 1980’s, serving Maastricht from LGW. Go find those photos…. 🙂

    Skymonster did!

    including several different Viscounts (only one at a time) on the LGW-Maastricht route:

    1L.

    in reply to: A Lovely Sunday Morning At Manchester. #606686
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Nice pic’s Grey.

    I hate the way Emirates have started putting their name on the underside of their aircraft.

    1L.

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 1,009 total)