next time, he needs to make it 20 times bigger…….
Wow.. that’s skill!
Please remember that for a B1.1, you will need 2 years relevant experience within a Part 145 company – assuming you are training with a Part 147 registered school- if not, you will need 5 years experience. The experience must be on European registered jet propelled aircraft weighing over 5700Kg.
If its a B1.3 you are gaining, the same weight restriction applies, as does the Part 145 company.
I have experience on the BBMF’s Lancaster (as a civillian, and it does not count towards my B1 licence – just 6 months of ambition fulfilled….
Oh and Scott, your best bet is to talk to Newcastle Aviation Academy (since you’re just down the road from us!) You will need RELEVANT qualifications to gain access to the B1 / Foundation degree course, but to get on our lead in course (or anyone elses) you will need 5 GCSE’s at C or above in Maths, English and a science. All courses are full time.
OR you could try licence by post… 35 quid an exam…. oh and a couple of grand for the notes.
In short, yes.
It gets very stuffy in there apparently. Removing the hatches gives a bit of air circulation.
That MLG bogie looks like all its for for is scrap…..
In the case of the Short 184 IN MY OPINION:
Leave it as it is – seal it into an preserving atmosphere, basically a display case where temperature and humidity are controlled. In a suitable environment, the remains of this unique airframe could be kept in their current condition indefinitely.
It would probably be cheaper to commission a replica of the complete aircraft and display that next to the remains of the original . This way we get the best of both worlds – a complete example and the preservation of unique material.
Obviously this is only the case where a unique aircraft is preserved as a section or a wreck. I think Elvington’s Halifax replica would have been better if it didn’t include any of the original aircraft, but was displayed next to the fuselage section.
The BBMF certainly do charge for appearances. What you have to do is enter a bid for the display charge. They will then look at the income vs the expenditure, hours, transit time, etc. They will then select which events to attend with the aircraft available. Hence we haven’t seen the Lanc display at Sunderland airshow for 2 years. I hasten to add that the BBMF are by far the cheapest option for getting a WW2 warbird to a display.
Having just been to RAF Morpeth last weekend and measured the rise and fall of the runways, I can say that the data here is good. Nice programme!
The Weeks Lancaster is the former Strathallen one. Damaged in a hangar collapse and moved across to Florida in a series of boxes. It is still there, or at least was in August, still in the packing crates, untouched. It is way down the list of restorations apparently. There are sections of the same aircraft spread far and wide, but Weeks has the majority of it including the nose, and wings. Apparently he has parts of KB944 too.
Crashed in Keilder Forest. Can’t remember the serial. Most of it is still up there apparently although cut into very small pieces, blown up and set alight. Then buried. The roundel section is the biggest bit recovered. http://www.neam.org.uk will have the answers.
external pictures show nothing… I’m an aircraft engineer… 😀
Nice pic though. Find the Lancaster major at Coventry thread and see some of mine – naked Lanc!
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=66623&highlight=PA474+coventry
Spars, wing joints, primary structure….
Am I missing something here? The official website claims that there will be TWO not four airworthy merlins delivered. Where has the other magazine found the other two from? Are there already two airworthy merlins on site at East Kirby? Are there plans to overhaul the four currently fitted engines?
Having never seen Just Jane, what condition is she in? According to the rumour network, she could fly with the replacement of the engines and nothing else major – just how much life is left in the spar? Is this going to be a case of getting her ready for a ferry flight to a maintenance facility where spar refurbishment could take place? IS SHE REALLY GOING TO FLY or are we reading too much into all of this?……
The ‘Warwick’ wing structure is not warwick, or wing.. or aeroplane for that matter!… It is the tailplane of the YAM halifax reproduction – this original tailplane lacked structural strength and sagged when fitted. It was subsequently replaced with a much improved version.
As I recall, what you have labelled as Wellington is actually Warwick….
Wartime ones I would hazard a guess at white. High viz and low cost. I don’t have any info to back that up though.
taken from the unpublished memoirs of LAC (aircrew) Pete Humphries:
…The target is thirty feet long, which included the stabilising ten feet of net at the end. It was 5 feet wide with a five foot pole at its leading edge which contained a five pound weight at the base which helps to stabilise the target itself…
1000 ft of cable used during the tow.
This was the description of targets used on Battles at Hawarden 57OTU. From1943, they switched to sleeve targets and Martinets at Eshott.
Next week, he’s going to fill it with lighter fluid and chuck it out of his bedroom window………