dark light

Lindy's Lad

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,493 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1206441
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Its HLF’s policy of funding projects at their beginning and not their continued existence that has been a major problem with alot of projects – not just tin triangular ones.

    There is a huge discrepency between the money for capital projects by HLF and the funding available to charitable organisations which have existed for over a year. Most projects end up either closing or having to scrimp and beg for small amounts from dozens of contributors.

    Personally I think that anyone trying to operate an airline (which TVOC effectively are) on their budget must be given credit.

    Shall we all stop bickering about how rubbish it all appears to be until definitive proof of misconduct appears? The budgets for TVOC will be kept at TVOC and will be available on written request in line with Companies House legislation. I believe the auditors will also have a copy, as will the Public Records office. Ask, pay a fee, and view – only then complain about how badly managed it has been.

    That said, I agree with MJR – the PR has been pretty bad. I do disagree with CHOX though – have you ever tried to hire a celebrity for an after inner speech let alone a public statement? Jeremy Clarkson charges £8000 just to turn up. Imagine the overheads if JC was used instead of the man who made the dream a reality…

    We are just going around in circles in this thread, with a few staunch supporters against the people who have always doubted one aspect of the project or other.

    Whether it fails or not, this project has paved the way for future return to flight projects within the complex category. If it fails, we must look in detail at why it failed and how we do better next time.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1207544
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Not to mention getting very little value for money.

    How much did the restoration cost?
    How many shows did it attend?
    How many people saw her?

    (I do agree with you here, however, just to stir the hornets nest…..)

    £15 million restoration (?)
    10 shows + innocent bystanders + test flights + news stories … say 2 million people (?)

    = £7.50 cost per head to see a Vulcan.. in 1 year.

    Dutch masters painting – £50 million
    1 permanent exhibition. In London, say 500,000 people per year = £100 cost per head.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1207569
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    grounded until 603 is torn apart. I said that months ago… 😀

    You there, at the back of the class – pay attention! Sorry, its late and I’m suffering

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1207587
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    No Vulcans in sight…. 😀 – a whole airfield returned to WW2 condition, and something similar to Airspace alongside.

    Besides the point. The above post is just my personal opinion.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1207645
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Just remember that TVOC have done what they said they would do – return XH558 to airworthy status and fly her. Please remember that they are technically running an airline (same levels of maintenance control) and that in 2008, 34 – yes THIRTY FOUR airlines went bankrupt. TVOC have managed to keep their heads above water so far. Yes there is now a shortfall, but with no major revenue (substitute passengers for a major sponsor) perhaps this shortfall is due almost solely to the massive recession we now find ourselves in. Ironically, a recession was a factor in 558’s original retirement!

    I cannot pass judgement on the management as I have no direct link with them, only the second hand words of a trusted collegue -but I think that one day Dr Robert Pleming will be remembered as the man who managed to get a complex category aircraft flying in this country. (His team will no doubt be forgotten to history as all great teams are.. sorry Bubbles).

    The major sponsor is always just around the corner – discussions with big companies can take years (I know from experience!) and even then things will not go as planned or hoped.

    Even if 558 doesn’t fly again, the fact of the matter is TVOC tried! No one else did….

    Finally, since the operating company is a public company, the full accounts will be available upon request…. somewhere….

    By the way…. can anyone donate £30 million for a new aviation heritage centre in the North East please?…. 😀

    in reply to: Aircraft-Carrier ‘Clemenceau’ Heading for Britain #1211569
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    [QUOTE=mlc;1362060]”We’ve now got a ticking, toxic time bomb and we’re going to live in a nightmare haze of toxicity for the rest of our lives. We live in a town where we’re breathing it every day of our lives.”

    QUOTE]

    Sounds like Teesside before the ghost ships….. 😀

    (and yes, I’m a product of Teesside!)

    in reply to: Vulcan Airframe Manual #1215052
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    NEAM have only the second part of the airframe manual… and that’s well over 1000 pages….

    They are available on e-bay, BUT to be fair, I’ve not seen the airframe manuals on there, just the pilots notes.

    TVOC will have them on CD most likely. I know they let us copy the Vol 3.

    in reply to: Britannia XN398 Survivor? #1219790
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    If it is a Brit, may I suggest that the dozens at Dubai may be easier to get….

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=25.334046,55.497866&z=18&t=h&hl=en-GB

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #1226864
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Ollie, she’s stunning. I still miss the old girl. 🙁 she’s a credit to you and the rest of the guys.

    I’ve just used a photo of her fuel panel (centre console) in one of my lessons. Would it be possible to scan the AP page with the drawing of it for me please? Its the perfect example of just how complex these things can be, plus I can talk my way round it! If possible, PM me and I’ll send my works e-mail. Many thanks!

    in reply to: Jag at Brunty #1227246
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    There is at least one ground running Jag still at Cosford. Most of the others are live and ‘could’ fly again in theory. Worry not!… well, not YET.

    in reply to: You won't believe this! #431542
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Seriously, could you not tell that the whole sequence is a mix of CGI and model?…….

    in reply to: History of IT in Aviation #1232130
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    either way, both were crap…….:D

    in reply to: 1950's refuel bowser picture request #1233062
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Yakrider, if you have the original posters, you have a pair of Frank Wootton prints… I have copies in a 1950’s copy of the Wonder book of aircraft…

    in reply to: History of IT in Aviation #1233071
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    It also depends how far you want to go with the presentation and what direction you want to take it.

    For PC based software you could look at maintenance aids such as the RAF’s LITS system which is a glorified data management system.

    Sticking with maintenance (you know me…) you could investigate the use of computers in aircraft based diagnostics – on board maintenance systems on an A310 will tell you which cabin bulbs need changing – all at the press of a button (or ten)

    For aircraft systems in the past, you could go towards the previously mentioned mechanical computers from WW2 onwards.

    You could look at autoland systems where the computer assesses the data it is given by the flight control systems and compares it to known data for the airport and what is given by airport based systems – think Trident.

    You could look at modern civil aviation with the ARINC series of Data busses – Airbus fly by wire, or even look towards the future with Boscome Down’s experiments with Fly by Light….

    Just a thought -in the modern aircraft maintenance hangar, there are no paper copies of maintenance manuals – everything is done with CD ROMs and internet links. Paperwork is getting more and more PC based – even the old RAF form 731 (serviceable/unserviceable labels for removed components) had a barcode – and that was 10 years ago!

    You need to quantify what you want to present, simply because ‘IT in aviation’ is a monstrous subject.

    If you need any help with it, just drop me a line and pop up to the academy (old Gill hangar)

    in reply to: Les Bywaters #1161050
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    To echo Avrobaby, condolences. Les advised me on the best course of action for NEAM’s TT18.

    He can’t have been that old?….. Blue skies to a true aviation enthusiast – if only eveybody put in as much effort as him.

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,493 total)