dark light

Lindy's Lad

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,493 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What Important Airframes Might Be Lost In 2008? #1317325
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Yeah, like a coffee shop or somethin.. :rolleyes:

    We’re working on that one……. 😀

    in reply to: What Important Airframes Might Be Lost In 2008? #1318693
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Can they be acquired?

    I need a set for G-ARYC, to cover the very nice set of engines we had donated last year.

    Bruce

    I will ask the question. I know that they are not being used – perhaps in exchange for some publicity…..? What else is on your HS125 list of wants?….

    in reply to: What Important Airframes Might Be Lost In 2008? #1318857
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Dead as in gone, or dead as in knackered?

    If the latter, does it still have cowlings with it?

    Bruce

    dead as in lying in a puddle of water in 3 sections…… Cowlings are complete and stored off the aircraft (indoors)………:D

    in reply to: What Important Airframes Might Be Lost In 2008? #1318864
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    IMHO the NAHR is very much “on topic” as one of its uses is to act as reference point for airframes that move into ‘danger’ either through a group’s demise or through airframes being offered for sale overseas.

    As for BAPC, it is my personal belief that they should be shouting the merits of the NAHR at every opportunity.

    With regard to NEAM’s F100 – I understood that your ‘chair’ had come to some agreement re a ‘rolling wing exchange and repair programme!’

    Quite right… on all counts. I am a firm supporter of the BAPC and its activities, and as such actively promote it whenever possible.

    Re F100, HN is looking into (rather deeply) the prospects of getting the repairs / replacemets sorted out… for now though, the aircraft is in real danger.

    Another one in danger (not yet, but soon) is the Boeing 737-200 C-GWJO at Newcastle Airport. It is maintained well, but unless a roof is built over it, it will die eventually. The HS125 at the same location is officially dead. Sorry.

    in reply to: Aviation Prints- Amazing & Unusual Subjects #1318893
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Is there a large demand for this type of art image? As a friend of GAVA, and an aspiring artist I’m always on the lookout to try something new. Those images (especially the Komet blazing skywards) are very impressive. Are they all hand applied media or digitally enhanced?

    I agree on the burning Lanc picture – very good, but not something I’d have up in the living room… ‘Last Flight’ is an impressive study into the light from flame….

    in reply to: What Important Airframes Might Be Lost In 2008? #1318908
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    The secretary of the BAPC is a regular reader of this forum…….:D

    As an aside…. actually getting back to the tread topic… almost…

    Our F100 is in dire need of help. I looked at it today, and its pretty much knackered. We need some new wings….tail… fin…:eek:

    The Victor at Marham must be considered to be in grave danger of facing the chop… They now have a tornado and a canberra….

    Boulmers Phantom is safe… so don’t worry about that one.;)

    in reply to: A military historic aviation forum? #1319696
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    I am trying my best to push civil cause on here 😉

    Would it help if I went out and rescued another civil plane? :p Would go after 748 G-BEJD but Lindys Lad has called that one 😀

    Jon

    Get stuck in on JD mate! The more the merrier. I’ll have any airliner so long as I can get a full interior for it….. oh and something that will fit in my hangar (smaller than an A300 please…!)

    in reply to: Newbie needs Help with Westland Scout parts #1319706
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Try the Army Air Corps themselves….

    in reply to: A military historic aviation forum? #1319720
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    nah…. simply all down to the fact that most historics are military – the ones most of us grew up watching at airshows, etc. There’s been a fair bit of civvie stuff lately – Percival Princes, Shorts 330’s, connies, Sunderland airport (non of which will be at legen……(!) )…… swings and roundabouts….. keep the faith.

    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    another case of note: NEAM have the UK’s only F86D. Its last and longest service was with the greek AF, and so keeping it in those colours would have been more historically correct. However, it served briefly with the ‘Sabre Knights’ display team in the USAF (4 years if memory serves), and so it is that scheme we are returning it to. Much prettier and visitor friendly. Most people recognise it as an American jet fighter (I’m thinking of the average 10 year old here…), but the same people walk straight past the Historically correct F84 (preserved in its original paint!) in Greek markings right next to the F86…..

    There is a place for preservation and conservation…. I think its down to the historical significance of the airframe. The F84 didn’t lead an exciting life, so nothing is to be gained by putting it into USAF or French AF markings…

    As for things like the mossie prototype, I kind of like it in the yellow! Its unusual, and if its correct, why change it?

    DG202 – imho, it should be in its original colours – something recognisable and relevant to the history of the aircraft, even though it has mk3 wings. Paint can be changed. Un-modifying an aircraft can’t be so easily done.

    Just a thought….

    in reply to: What Important Airframes Might Be Lost In 2008? #1320263
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Good – looks like we have found one candidate to save.

    LL – if you are successful, where are you going to keep it? NEAM?

    Lets keep a close eye on this one, as it is certainly a worthy candidate.

    …….

    Bruce

    Sorry Bruce, but this aircraft would not be retired to a museum just yet. It would be bought complete, but only the fuselage would be used (don’t worry, the wings and tail would be retained in storage). It would then become available to museums when we are finished with it (also plus an interior). I would estimate 5 – 10 years use maximum. Preservation is not the aim of this business, simply viewing the aircraft as a cheap training aid. Preservation is, however, my aim….;)

    in reply to: What Important Airframes Might Be Lost In 2008? #1320650
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    NEAM use the list. I believe it is based on historical significance, rarety, condition, and location (indoors/outdoors).

    E-mail the BAPC secretary, Brian Dixon, for any details you require. If he doesn’t have the info to hand, he will point you in the right direction.

    [email]secretarybapc@blueyonder.co.uk[/email]

    in reply to: What Important Airframes Might Be Lost In 2008? #1320681
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    Do people think there is much more to potentially be “lost” from within the preservation movement then?

    I know which 748 you mean! Shame as she was sat at Liverpool for ages then for some reason they ferried her up to Blackpool…. 🙁 Odd really as I believe there isnt a great deal you can swap onto a mk2.

    Jon

    That particular 748 is pretty gutted – no interior. She’s pretty shabby really, but so is the rest of the fleet. I was looking around there a few weeks ago, and she is the better one of the two I was offered, so hopefully she won’t be sat there for too much longer. It depends on the administrators of course. There is a risk that she could be scrapped on site since she shares very little with the other 748’s and probably would be too expensive to return to flight.

    As for the other thing, yes I believe that in the UK, more is at risk from inside the preservation movement than outside now. We seem to have reached a point where if it could have been preserved, then it has. What threatens more than anything now is developers! Look at BAM…. how many organisations are sitting on rented sites? All it takes is for one or two land owners to say, ‘ no contract renewal’ , and thats dozens of aircraft looking for a new home. I’m not about to start a museum war here, so I’ll use my own concern as an example.

    Look at the NEAM wbsite, http://www.neam.org.uk , and imagine what you would save if it were to close:
    Swift – private owners (saved)
    F86D – I’m sure IWM would have it (saved)
    anson – priavte owners (saved)
    eveything else …… scrapped.

    just a thought

    in reply to: What Important Airframes Might Be Lost In 2008? #1320692
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    I agree with Bruce.

    I think it is worth noting that most of the losses come from within the preservation movement these days – certainly in the UK there simply are no historic aircraft left lying in scrap yards now.

    There is one other aircraft I have just thought of – the sole remaining HS748 mk1…. currently at Blackpool, within a company in administration…although I am trying to get hold of it.

    Falklands veteran Harriers and Gulf veteran Jags are probably the only ‘modern’ aircraft to beome endangered.

    in reply to: What Important Airframes Might Be Lost In 2008? #1320827
    Lindy’s Lad
    Participant

    603 technically is in the preservation scene already – TVOC and BAE are parting her out for spares.

    She will die this year, but her demise has been much publicised on here and other forums, so I won’t mention her again.

    Can’t think of anything else which is in absolute danger up this end of the country. Perhaps the Humbrol Hunter? Perhaps our Vulcan?

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,493 total)