The P-40 did indeed display at East Fortune, and Mustang ‘Old Crow’ also displayed. Neither of them was in the programme.
an unexpected delight to see both.
Old Crow was at s’land…. my memory is shot! Must be the sunburn….
Nice…
Anyone got a simple schematic of the wing – I’d be very interested to see how they designed it with only one spar! Common design rules dictate that the wing would flex around its lateral axis (Unless of course I misunderstand the concept….)
A Hercules has literally just this second gone overhead here.
Overnight stop at Newcastle if its the RAF Falcons one from East Fortune…
Sunderland airshow classic participants today were, in order,
Team Guinot Stearmans
Catalina
BBMF Lanc (single pass, north to south – headed towards whitby)
P-51D Old Crow
Aerostars Yak 50s… dozens of the things!… well half a dozen
BBMF Spit (invasion striped one), and Hurri (Night Reaper)
Lanc was seen over Blyth en-route, so seems to have tracked down the coast from East Fortune to Conningsby.
Heads up for tomorrow – we have been promised a Hunter… alledgedly…
I thought the Mosquito boys at Salisbury hall were looking at getting their B.35(?) mossie in the air…. some time ago I remember there being some excitement around x-raying it to spot delamination.. I know nothing, so I’ll shut up now…
Bruce!….. Bruce!…..?
It didn’t go to S’land airshow, but a Mustang did (Moose?) Could have been heading to East Fortune..?
This year goes from bad to worse for loss of life. My condolences to all. Can we start this year all over again?…:(
Recently done a T33 (French) with dayglo nose, tail and tip tank stripes.
White undercoat reflects the daygo, same as any other undercoat. White is best so the top colour doesn’t deminish. Grey / yellow for darker colours, white for ‘transparent ‘ colours like daygo and yellow….
Probably….
Thanks guys- more pics tomorrow.
NEAM has ups and downs. We are emerging from a down period with all guns blazing. I think ‘languishing’ is perhaps not the most appropriate word. Stagnation isn’t either. Lots has been done in the past couple of years, but only the best trained eye would notice… Things had gone a bit quiet for a while there, but certainly the interest is going up! All hands to the pump now.
Been to the Sunderland airshow today!
27 July continued….
As I was saying earlier:
The Vulcan is exposed to yobs (no golf course, just football fields) and is hemmed in on three sides. Access to the rear of the aircraft is non-existant for anything bigger than a ride-on lawnmower… In the very near future, we (and another company) will need access to the rear of the aircraft with a hiab or crane. (Depending on TVOC’s survey again…) the aircraft needs to move forward to a location next to the hangar. Plus, there is no way I’m spending the next twelve months replacing panels, glass, etc just to have them shot out again the day after she is painted. Passing trade is really not that great, we seem to rely more on word of mouth, and people coming from the pub on a sunday…
Today was a bit of a record for a weekday – more visitors than volunteers for once. Several happy kids and parents- the Vulcan cockpit has been cleaned and generally spruced up, and since we are working on her pretty much constantly, we can allow visitors access to the cockpit. Normally, there is just one person in the entrance to the museum, and naturally he can’t leave there to hike over to the Vulcan… First thing we need to do once the survey comes back, assuming its ok, is to move her. We need to lay three deep concrete pads – we have the hardcore, just need concrete and a mini digger (hired of course), and then tow the beastie without snapping the nose leg off….:eek:
We seemed to acheive alot today – a bit of a corporate day so far as I was concerned. Prints, mugs, mousemats, and the deputy manager, webcams, servers, and Ghost Haunted….. busy busy..:cool:
Some VERY interesting deals happening behind the scenes, which could prove to be a saviour to the museum – If they happen, we could be looking at building a hangar double the size of the current main hangar… before the end of the year…! Its all hush hush. sorry!
Cheers for the mention LL! Good to meet you at last today. And that’s Glancey, with a G 🙂
Don’t worry, you’re not the first to mis-spell it, and I’m fairly sure you won’t be the last…:p
Doh! Post ammended! Sorry Simon…
27 July update
Lots of work done today by the Newcastle Aviation Academy members on the surrounds of the Vulcan. Its a long hard slog to find the tennis court, but it is getting there.
The Dragonfly needs its blades put on, then it is complete. A spare engine is going to be cleaned up and displayed with it once it moves into the display hall.
Mr. Simon Glancey http://www.wwrgallery.co.uk paid us a visit today and a deal has been done regarding his wonderful prints of our aircraft. In the near future (subjet to the size of the manager’s wallet) we shall be selling his prints from the museum. Please visit his website above to see what he does!
Webcams have been fitted today, the server is up and running, and a preliminary website has been set up. Thanks here must go to the Ghost Haunted team, http://www.ghosthaunted.co.uk with whom we are dealing very closely, and without whom none of this would have been possible. I’ll update you with a website address after I have checked it out. It will be updated regularly! There is an interim website which they have set up – please follow their website for directions, or use this link straight to the site:
http://www.ghosthaunted.co.uk/neam/
Reference the position of the Vulcan – she cannot stay where she is for the reasons mentioned above. We will lose the passing trade who see her, but this should be more than compensated for by the rapid improvement in advertising / website / and changes in the layout at the site.
If we can move her over the grassed area while work is carried out, then by the time she is painted up, a hangar should have been built covering her original position, so she can be moved back. ‘Funding’ I hear you cry – depending on a couple of deals, the hangar can be built.
However, we are still looking for sponsors for the Vulcan restoration as we cannot pin all hopes on the salvation of the museum on a couple of deals….
We have steel plates, but I think something a little more substantial would be better…. more later….
PM’d….
Before moving the Vulcan, we need somewhere to put her. Three good concrete standings would be enough for now, until a floor can be laid under her. She needs to move (providing the spars are good) for a number of reasons:
We cannot get any equipment behind her to fix the fin / flying controls
She is too far from the centre of the museum and there are no paths to her, just alot of grass (and in this weather, mud)
We can’t get electrical power anywhere near her – she is nearly 60m from the nearest plug, so thats 3 standard extensions just to hoover the cockpit.
The local yobs have easy access to her because of the proximity of the fence – where’s the point of restoring if she’s used for target practice every day. (5 golf balls today…. I’m going to open a driving range….)
If she is to get a roof over her, she needs to be away from the mobile phone mast which is directly behind her, and on a good base to build on – the tennis courts she is on now are not solid….
So a local TA unit with whom we have good links may be able to help us, but if we can move her with the loan of a correct towing arm (unless we have one hidden somewhere) and a decent tractor, then all the better….
I didn’t mean to give the impression that a museum should grap anything which comes its way – certainly for us the only aircraft to have been aquired in the last ten years was the DH Dove – and I personally think that was down to personallity problems, grudges, and bad decisions. Already this aircraft is giving us a headache. If the management had not bought it so quickly, put aside their personal feelings, and thought rationally, then perhaps we would have been better off buying a storage container for our spares and parts rather than an airframe which we have no room for! I certainly agree that a deeper thought process must go into aquisitions, disposals and allocation of funds. By the way – thats my personal opinion!!! Just before the boss starts ranting!
Our problems are many, and if we keep the airframes which the public like seeing because they know what they are, then perhaps it will allow us to restore and preserve the rareties which enthusiasts come to see. I still don’t like the idea of culling the replicated airframes though….
I agree with Misha (but I am biased of course). Quality should be before quantity. However, many collections have been passed down so that the current crop of managers and volunteers may have had nothing to do with the original collecting policy if there even was one, so many of us have common / replicated aircraft and the odd gem hidden away.
There can’t be too many museums who are soley dedicated to a particular cause 100%. I’m sure that even at the Mosquito Aircraft Museum (sorry for name dropping Bruce) they have one or two exhibits which have nothing to do with Salisbury Hall, or DeHavilland hidden somewhere…. Despite them having a very clear policy on what they collect now…
Some aircraft are at their locations purely because the private owner wishes them to be displayed near to where they are. It must be difficult for any museum to refuse what could be a prize exhibit even though it is outside of their collecting policy.
Lets take this example – If I was to offer our F86D for disposal (I’m not, so don’t get excited!) how many museums would jump at the chance to get a rare airframe under their roof? Would the F86D fit with anyones policy save for the American Air Force part of Duxford? What about the Pucara – does it have a place in a British Museum?
If we solely directed our aquisitions to aircraft which had a link to Usworth, we would not have any aircraft at all. We would need Hurricane, Wapity, Spitfire, Dakota, Chipmunk, RE8, Anson… and other such examples. Gone would be the majority of the collection. We have a chipmunk which is loaned out….
If we decided to include the Sqn aircraft in that collection, we would be able to keep a Vampire.
Location links — well, has anyone got a Sunderland they don’t want?…
Interesting conjecture for sure. Impractical in reallity.