A number of sources suggest that it’s a tail bumper, fitted to some late production aircraft.
I’d also be interested as to why the rear hatch is open?
Still being built in 2017, not bad for a design going back to 1960. Almost Herculean!
Nothing wrong with wishing that certain aircraft might stay in a certain country. No point in getting upset though, when people buy things that other people are selling. It’s not like the family silver is being sold off.
Have the Swiss aircraft been modified with upgraded instrument panels in the postwar period? If so, could the movie reflect this?
More information here;
http://www.goodall.com.au/australian-aviation/ryan-stm/ryan-stm.htm
Cheers,
Matt
Got them all, allowing for the fact that they mislabelled a modified T-6 as a P-43. Nice to see the Moorabbin Beaufighter, in a screenshot from a video of a squadron reunion in the 80s. Ground running it and the P-40 was something to see!
Good timing, I’ve just re-read that novel. It did keep me wondering though, which other types could have been the basis for the Airtruck and Carrier?
I’ve long-considered them to be the literary equivalents of the Miles Aerovan and the Budd Conestoga.
Ah, the good old Plymouth Tramp! Neil Shute would be proud!
Yikes! The Battle is looking ghastly! Utterly unbecoming of such a rare machine.
When it’s something that bored you twenty-five years ago!
Thank you, David.
One thing that really strikes me is that the glasshouse was part of an aeroplane that flew quite a number of combat missions. To think that under and behind this very structure, sat young men who experienced operational flying, is very sobering. Who were the men who flew in Saucy Sue? Did they return home or lose their lives later in the war? How old were they? So much to ponder.
David, you’re spot-on; the amount of original material will be substantial, and it wasn’t an anonymous machine that was kept out of harm’s way. It’ll stand as a tribute to those who served. Like your own project, those who served are commemorated. As we know, the human story gives these machines value and meaning; which makes aeroplanes more than just chunks of metal or wood and fabric.
The local history museum will be a very appropriate home, as a number of RAAF combat veterans came from this small town, and the Beauforts were known in the district.
Interesting thing about the glasshouse section is that it was purchased from Wagga, twenty-five miles away, where a large number of Beauforts were scrapped. These sections were snapped up by people who grew tomatoes under them for years. This one ended up at the local tip, and was rescued by an old stoner, who dragged it home so he could grow marijuana under it! Turns out it was no good, as the plants grew too big. Apparently this is not ideal, so it became a garden ornament until I found it and it was given to me. And now I’ll become part of a nose section once more.
Pics to follow; thank you all for your interest and thoughts.
Cheers,
Matt
Thank you, chaps.
I’ve long thought that the Beaufort hasn’t been given the recognition it deserves, especially given that the story of those who built, maintained, and flew Beauforts is a noble one. The challenges involved in getting them into service in Australia is a story in itself, and I hope that my little project helps to add to our knowledge of what people achieved all those years ago. I’ll update this thread as work progresses.
Cheers,
Matt
Them too, of course! I hadn’t seen the Spitfire blog for quite some time, good stuff.
I’m particularly interested in 3D design, so I’m interested in your thoughts as to how you’d combine ‘tinbashing and printing’.
Is it a Loire-Nieuport LN.401? It’s certainly ugly!
Cheers,
Matt
Thanks Ross. Your 3D design work is very impressive, and is evidence of how modern technology can assist the vintage aviation movement.