Of course Feggans Brown had already built the FSMs for the TV series “A Piece of Cake”. I’m aware of the following:
———- Spitfire cockpit, prepared for the TV but not used, now with Alan Partington in Catford
.
That cockpit is odd. It was built bottomless with the canopy sealed with aquarium sealant anf plumbing fittings on the bulkheads at each end. The original idea was to invert, slowly fill it with water, and film the occupant of one the aircraft that failed to fly under a river bridge drowing. The filming never took place. The cockoit was also about three inches too wide, not a problem until you try to fit correct sized mock up frames and instrument panel. It went on loan to an ATC squadron as a project but, as is so often the case, a change in OC meant that no work was carried out.
Don’t just consider it, do it.
Come on, get out and talk to people who don’t have a clue what you’re doing, enlighten them.
It’s good fun and you might learn something from someone who manufactured or worked on or flew the same type as your cockpit or even, as has happened at Damyns Hall, someone who worked on the actual aircraft your cockpit was detached from.
Alf’s pleas, he’s a miserable pleader, don’t do the event justice. The lack of flying is a disappointment but not so much as to make it not worth attending. The variety of forces represented there with high levels of accuracy and the arena displays are stunning.
And in response to a comment made privately to me, I don’t work for the event or the HMVA, I’m just a cockpit owner who thinks that we need to get out more and I’m putting my money where my mouth is, so to speak.
Given all the recent controversy, will the CAA let them display it?
Even if the recent restrictions don’t apply, I’d certainly ask about future vintage jet policy before spending a lot of money on an aircraft the authorities may not let fly.
And lets not forget part two of the EU Firearms directive which might mean they all have to be scrapped or sent overseas to countries outside the EU or to Germany, which has refused to implement to directive
No indeed – but interesting to see that he sees it as primarily an issue of cutting migration, and has not, in his decently long post, considered the economic arguments.
I do think its time for some to consider the benefits of migration. By and large, and whatever you read in the press, people aren’t coming here to live on benefits. They come because they can get well paid jobs, and they benefit our economy as a result of this. I note yesterday that employment as a percentage of population is now at the highest level since records began, so you cant even claim they are stealing ‘our’ jobs.
Living where I do I can tell you that while some immigrants perform magnificent work in various jobs, many do come here just for the higher benefits and send a good proportion of the money back to their home country, bet that isn’t included in the Overseas Aid to corruption Budget. As to the refugee that are allowed in once they’ve entered the EU, look at the news, and on the streets round me, how many are fit young men and and how many are elderly or women or children?
Re the stealing of our jobs, there is evidence that immigrants are taking low paid jobs that would otherwise go to the indigenous population but this is possibly as much about rogue employers as the immigrants themselves. As in a previous post, many of them are little more than slaves and some die because of a disregard for safety on the part of their slave masters, and that’s not being emotive, that’s exactly what they are.
I’m voting out because I’ve seen things like the Payment services directive damage commerce and things like the firearms directive damage heritage and facilitate terrorism.
I’ve not heard anything much from the Brexit Group but most of the statements from Cameron etc lack credibility and make me think that if they have to resort to half truths and fantasy to make their case then we’re better off out. Even the supposed reforms aren’t a done deal, there’s no requirement to implement them and probably no likelihood.
And I’ve a strong fear that if we stay in we’ll be severely punished for our temerity in having a referendum.
That is of course unless the second part of the EU legislation for deactivated weapons is rubber stamped into law by faceless unelected bureaucrats in Brussels. Not only will there be no deactivated weapons of any kind or anything that even looks like a weapon but also no weapons platforms. No flying ex-warbirds full stop.
Off now to make a cup of tea, I have of course filled in an Action Plan and Risk Assessment
Think I’d need something stronger.
Re the firearms directive, it went much further than was originally envisaged. Germany saw how stupid it is, it actually facilitates working weapon smuggling, and took advantage of an opt out clause. Our Government however is very keen to implement it. The danger for us, apart from increased terrorist acts and increased taxes to cover the cost of implementing it, is that not only will warbirds not be allowed to fly but it’s possible that they may not be possessed.
Anyone know where I can get cheap flights to New Zealand?
STCVSS sounds nasty, I hope they find a cure.
Assuming is isn’t some awful disease or condition, what is it?
Bing and Google were no help
When the list was drafted back in February it only represented those V-Force squadrons that were being represented by veterans at the Reunion (at that time); it was not meant to be a definitive V-Force list.
I am now pleased to report that 15 and 214 are now represented as well; but not STCVSS (??) according to the details presented so far.
208 Squadron was an error made during the cut and paste phase of drafting the list – some veterans listed all of their RAF service, and that one escaped the edit! Apologies all round. 😮
Don’t see why you’re apologising, it was obvious to anyone who actually read the post.
It is likely to be that the only airshows that will remain, will be those held over some portion of the coast and supported , at least in part, by the local authority. Bournemouth, Eastbourne and Clacton come to mind.
Dawlish, over the sea and very much supported by the local authority, has been cancelled.
‘
The knock-on ramifications to people who make air-shows are all-encompassing – ticket collectors, food vendors, stall holders, printers, gift/souvenir/novelty goods manufacturers, toilet providers, refuse collectors, programme sellers, it just goes on.
Not to mention the charities who would have benefitted from the air shows that are now being cancelled, the economies of seaside town’s that put on air shows that are being cancelled, even the Government will lose out on taxes from profits that will not now be generated.
I’m more of a mess up theory man than a conspiracy theory man but like many others I’m beginning to wonder if these changes are for a purpose other than improving safety, which they don’t, and funding the proper operation of the CAA
Fly.Buy is absolutely right the airshow scene is sadly finished, I guesstimate 80% of airshows/fly-ins will never take place again.
As somebody who is currently trying in a small capacity to arrange a small airshow I can tell you the problems are proving next to impossible. Sadly the only airshows that will survive will be the major commercial ones.
I think the CAA would rather everybody just forgot the whole thing, everybody has their head buried in the sand and nobody will make any sort of decision. Read the Facebook post by Peter Tallichet for an informed opinion.
The only way the whole thing can be averted is if somebody forces a Judicial Review, that’s the only way the CAA can be forced to stop exterminating the entire industry/ hobby
I have to agree with these comments.
Money talks, the Farnboroughs and RIATS will come to an arrangement with the CAA but the smaller less commercial, and for many more interesting and entertaining, shows will be forced out of business by the fees and regulations, some of which are fine but many are ill considered and appear to have no scientific basis.
A judicial review is probably the only way left to deal with this situation and bring some sense back into air show regulation but I can’t see it happening. In general, the aviation fraternity seen disinclined to work together to resolve any problems, even when it’s for their common good.
Not studied the new rules in detail but from what I’ve seen how can Farnborough and RIAT go ahead? From memory Abingdon is OK for sterile areas but display aircraft at Farnborough go over a road, and a pub, and at RIAT go over campsites etc.
or “can I get a…..” instead of “can I have a……”
language naturally changes and develops but it doesn’t mean you have to like those changes.
Interesting that one. I’m trying to learn Malayalam over Skype and my teacher in India often uses get or got and I have to ask what she means, have, buy, bring, understand etc..
And yes I have had to explain hangar/hanger too
She’s getting there………………
Fully agree but often reply with quote is the only reply option available.
I delete the quote if it’s not relevant, as I had to here.
Look forward to seeing your copter projects Tone, was going to say chopper but you know what some people are like – peasants.
Who are you calling a peasant?