dark light

Stonewall

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 437 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Groshkov Saga- The Final stretch. #2005258
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Aircraft Carrier Admiral Gorshkov

    (Source: Press Information Bureau India; issued March 15, 2010)

    Contracts and supplementary agreements comprising repair and re-equipping, logistic supports, training, etc were concluded with Russian side for acquisition of the aircraft carrier, ex-Admiral Gorshkov, in January 2004 at a cost of US Dollars 974 million.

    The Russian side submitted a revised Master Schedule indicating a delay in the project and an increase in price for repair and re-equipping of the aircraft carrier, due to increase in scope of work not originally envisaged.

    The Government approved the proposal for conducting negotiations with the Russian side for finalizing a revised Repair and Re-equipping Contract and other related contracts/agreements affected due to delay in the project and Additional Works projected.

    The negotiations have since been concluded by the Contract Negotiation Committee (CNC).

    The revised cost of USD 2,330 million has been approved by the Government. Prices for the works to be carried out under the revised contracts/agreements are fixed.

    The aircraft carrier was originally scheduled to be delivered in August 2008. The ship’s delivery is re-scheduled to December, 2012.

    Re-scheduling of the ship’s delivery and revision in its cost were necessitated due to emergence of Additional Works projected, detailed agreed scope of trials, etc.

    This information was given by Defence Minister Shri AK Antony in a written reply to Shri Manish Tewari and others in Lok Sabha today. (ends)

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/113178/india-details-new-agreement-on-russian-aircraft-carrier.html

    in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2005263
    Stonewall
    Participant

    just found this…

    http://en.rian.ru/images/15566/12/155661213.jpg

    in reply to: The Groshkov Saga- The Final stretch. #2005267
    Stonewall
    Participant
    in reply to: PLAN Carrier Updates. #2005425
    Stonewall
    Participant
    in reply to: The Groshkov Saga- The Final stretch. #2005775
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Gorshkov to cost 2.3 billion after years of negotiation

    Press Trust of India, Wednesday March 10, 2010, New Delhi

    After a three-year long renegotiation, the fresh price of Admiral Gorshkov aircraft carrier was finalised at USD 2.35 billion on Wednesday by the government, a day ahead of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s two-day visit to India.

    “The Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), which met here, has given its approval to the fresh price for Gorshkov,” a Defence Ministry official said here.

    India and Russia are likely to conclude the fresh contract for the aircraft carrier, bought by the Navy in 2004 and rechristened INS Vikramaditya, during Putin’s stay in the capital.

    The warship, purchased originally at a price of USD 974 million, is currently undergoing a refit at the Russian Sevmash shipyard.

    Since 2007, the shipyard sought a hike in the price for the warship’s refit programme and had revised the cost of the project twice to demand USD 2.9 billion.

    However, India had conveyed that it would not go beyond USD 2.2 billion as a revised price for the project.

    After renegotiation of the price for three-long years, the two sides finally arrived at a figure for the refit programme six months ago, but it had to go to the CCS for a final stamp of approval, which it received on Wednesday.

    Along with the warship, India had also bought 16 MiG-29K naval fighter aircraft for USD 526 million. The first four of these fighters were delivered to India on December 4 last and were inducted into the Navy on February 18 this year.

    The delivery of Gorshkov, which was originally scheduled for December 2008, has already witnessed a delay due to the price negotiations for the refit project and India had to push the Sevmash shipyard to hasten the programme for rescheduled delivery in 2013.

    During Putin’s visit, the two sides are also expected to sign a few more defense deals worth USD four billion, including the final agreement for joint manufacture of fifth generation fighters, additional MiG-29K fighters for USD 1.2 billion and joint development of a multirole transport aircraft.

    India is also expected to place orders for 40 more Sukhoi Su-30MKI multi-role fighters for the Indian Air Force.

    http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/cabinet-clears-234-billion-ins-gorshkov-deal-with-russia-17509.php

    in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2005828
    Stonewall
    Participant

    More Funding for Indian Scorpenes

    (Source: Forecast International; issued March 9, 2010)

    NEW DELHI — The Indian government has approved additional funding valued at INR20 billion ($438 million) for the Project 75 Scorpene submarine program. This is in addition to the INR187.9 billion ($4.1 billion) already allocated to this program.

    The funds are to cover the purchase of contractor-supplied equipment packages for the submarines. These packages include all major systems connected with the sensors, propulsion, and weaponry for the vessels.

    The cost of the contractor-supplied equipment packages had risen from $543 million to $950 million since the construction contracts were signed for the submarines. Negotiations over the price increase have been stalled so long – since October 2005 – that the submarine hulls under construction have no combat system to put inside them. This has delayed the Project 75 program by two years.

    The Indian Navy has also been criticized for delays in the follow-on Project 75I program for a second tranche of six diesel-electric submarines. Without these boats, the Indian Navy could drop to five operational submarines by 2015.

    -ends-

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/113017/more-funding-for-indian-scorpenes.html

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2005838
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Second M-type Frigate for Portugal arrives at home

    the NRP FRANCISCO DE ALMEIDA, former HrMs Van Galen, second of the “Bartolomeu Dias” class of 2 dutch frigates purchased from the Netherlands, arrived yesterday morning for the 1st time at her new home-base, near Lisbon

    photos Portuguese Navy

    http://www.marinha.pt/PublishingImages/GAB_0265.JPG

    http://www.marinha.pt/PublishingImages/GAB_0235.JPG

    http://www.marinha.pt/PublishingImages/GAB_0279.JPG

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2005980
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Felgenhauer…:rolleyes:

    I bet for him 13 of the 12 launches were a failure :dev2:

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2005983
    Stonewall
    Participant

    I still say…very expensive for a 30 yr old ship 😮

    but the lack of options available might give Pak no choice :diablo:

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2006196
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Bilateral Press Conference (selected excerpt)

    (Source: French Presidency; issued March 2, 2010)

    The following is our unofficial translation of remarks by French President Nicolas Sarkozy during a joint March 2 press conference with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev in Paris:

    “Regarding the Mistral [amphibious warfare ship], we decided that France and Russia would, as of today, enter into exclusive negotiations on the sale of four BPC (Batiment de Projection et Commandement, or force projection and command ships) Mistral ships, the first of which would be built in Saint-Nazaire, (western France), which does not mean that the others would not be, but as I said we are talking.

    …/…

    “This leads me to say a word about the Mistral. This is a command ship, a helicopter carrier, that we will build for the Russians without any military equipment. (Emphasis added—Ed.)

    …/…

    “As I mentioned the first ship would be produced at Saint-Nazaire. We are in exclusive negotiations for four, so we should find a rough balance between those that are manufactured here and those that are manufactured there. Two and two would be a rather reasonable compromise.

    -ends-

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/112801/france%2C-russia-open-talks-on-mistral-lhd-ships.html

    in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2006366
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Accident Aboard Indian Kilo-Class Sub, Sailor Killed

    An accident involving the battery compartment on the Indian Navy’s INS Sindhurakshak (S63) Kilo-class submarine, docked at Visakhapatnam, has left one sailor dead. The crew of the submarine has conducted full repairs and the boat is reported to be fine — it will shortly depart on deployment in the Indian Ocean. The Sindhurakshak was commissioned in 1998 and was the second-last Kilo to be commissioned. The Navy has not yet released details of the sailor who tragically lost his life in today’s accident. My condolences to the sailor’s family and the Navy.

    http://livefist.blogspot.com/

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2006615
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Kockums Receives Overall Design Order for Next-Generation Submarine

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/base/util/112659_1.jpg
    Artist’s impression of the Swedish Navy’s next-generation submarine (Kockums photo)

    (Source: Kockums AB; issued February 25, 2010)

    Kockums AB, part of ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, has signed a contract with FMV (the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration), concerning overall of the design phase of the next-generation submarine.

    This confirms the intention to develop Sweden’s submarine capability. Kockums is prime contractor for the order.

    The Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces has emphasized the importance of acquiring the next-generation submarine on a number of different occasions.

    The next-generation submarine features several advances in the development of underwater technology and marks the adaptation of submarines to meet current and future threats and to conduct the international mission now required. This refers particularly to the submarine’s role as an information gatherer.

    Next-generation also refers to further refinements in terms of stealth technology. The submarine will be able to see and hear everything over a wide area, while itself remaining undetected. It will be designed to be efficient in the Baltic and other littoral waters.

    “This is an important first step, not only for Kockums, but for the Swedish Armed Forces as a whole. We shall now be able to maintain our position at the cutting edge of submarine technology, which is vital in the light of current threat scenarios. HMS Gotland demonstrated what she is capable of during two years of joint exercises in the water off the USA. This next-generation submarine marks a further refinement of technology,” states CEO Ola Alfredsson, commenting the news.

    -ends-

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/article-view/release/112659/sweden-launches-next_generation-submarine-project.html#

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2006617
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Surely, it still has the ASW weapons & sensors.

    Fitting with RAM, or some other shortish-range SAM for self defece, should be relatively easy & not too expensive.

    Yes, IF they make those changes…otherwise I think it’s a very bad deal

    As far as I recall Greece bought the last Kortenaers for little more than 30 M€ :confused:

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2006669
    Stonewall
    Participant

    I’m sure there would be not need for cutting as the launcher arm is a moving part (it rotates in the horizontal plane)

    Hi Wanshan

    you are right, I got info about that:

    the MK-13 launchers on the OHPs, they were unbolted and removed along with the rotary magazine below deck and a steel plate was bolted onto the flange above deck. They could just be re-installed with little effort, however all the fire control consoles, STIR director and associated cabling was also removed. The main cost of re-installing it would be the missiles themselves. SM-1s cost about US$1.2M each plus spares, telemetry missiles and test missiles. That would take up over half of the refit budget just for missiles alone.

    so it seems Pakistan will have one of the most expensive OPVs in the world :confused:

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2006730
    Stonewall
    Participant

    I dont thinkg the entire launcher was removed, just the launcher arm (and the rest sealed)

    I read somewhere that the launchers were not even removed, they were CUT to the face of the launcher’s circular base.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 437 total)