dark light

thobbes

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 2,012 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2346471
    thobbes
    Participant

    False headline, which does not reflect the content of the article.

    Why is it false?

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2347752
    thobbes
    Participant

    Another interesting point is that the RAF plans to replace the brand new Eurofighter that is still being produced (and is arguably yet to be developed to a definitive stage) with the F-35A.

    What does this say about Eurofighter and in particular growth potential of the platform?

    And will this announcement affect export potential (“Why should I buy this plane when one of it’s main operators is already looking to replace it.”)?

    Might be reading too much into this. :p

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2347801
    thobbes
    Participant

    Apparently the Brits are cutting F-35B buy to 48 aircraft. However they will consider later buys of F-35A as a replacement for Eurofighter.

    http://www.janes.com/products/janes/defence-security-report.aspx?id=1065969970

    Some interesting questions raised:
    1. Will the F-35Bs now be purely Fleet Air Arm?
    2. What happens to the ageing Tornado fleet?

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2347804
    thobbes
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2347808
    thobbes
    Participant
    in reply to: Typhoon News & Discussions VII #2347812
    thobbes
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2350823
    thobbes
    Participant

    Could Colombia’s purchase be partially subsidised by Uncle Sam as part of the war on drugs?

    in reply to: Will many NATO air forces be mainly obsolete by 2030? #2351436
    thobbes
    Participant

    I doubt that the future Southern and Eastern airforces will be able to afford Rafales or Eurofighters in any numbers and if at all, even in good economic conditions.

    Even before the current crisis, most Eastern operators couldn’t afford to replace old jets and struggled even funding to replace ageing transports and helos.

    I personally think 2020 will see another big shrink in NATO airforces as many operators simply retire older jets without replacement.

    As for the current range of jets on offer, I suspect that some will be out of production by then if they don’t win any new orders (especially F/A-18E/F).

    in reply to: Status of F-35 fixes? #2351887
    thobbes
    Participant

    Have they considered a HUD in case the helmet is indeed delayed by several years?

    in reply to: Raptor pilots are not keen to fly… #2352014
    thobbes
    Participant

    F-16.net is a great resource – absolutely love all the info they’ve got including data bases etc.

    It’s forum is a sad joke though especially once you go to the F-35 and F-22 subforums.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2352016
    thobbes
    Participant

    Oh no. Nice big fat easy targets, all lined up like that, with the pilots having to concentrate on not crashing into each other.

    Great scene in a movie though – Apocalypse Now on steroids.

    Now imagine throwing a few Mi-28s into the mix.

    We need a drool icon.

    in reply to: Post-Assad Syrian Air Force, what will it be like? #2352520
    thobbes
    Participant
    in reply to: Post-Assad Syrian Air Force, what will it be like? #2352582
    thobbes
    Participant

    Given the way Libya is really working (i.e. fragmented) I doubt they’re going to be doing much in terms of air force upgrades.

    I suspect Syria is going down the same path.

    I think both countries airforces will end up resembling that of Afghanistan circa mid-90s – mainly helicopters with the odd ancient fast jet operational.

    Could be worse – they could go the way of the Somali Air Corps (and in Libya that’s still an option)!

    Iraq would’ve went the same way if Uncle Sam hadn’t provided a life line.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread – 19 #2356744
    thobbes
    Participant

    Look at the global trends: everyone is going heavy, or at least heavier than ever before. USAF/PLAAF/RuAF don’t even have modern light fighter programs; hell, the F-35 barely even qualifies as a ‘medium’ fighter!

    Problem with light fighters is limited scope especially in terms of radar, flexibility and range.

    And with shrinking fleets, flexibility becomes the order of the day.

    The other thing I think is happening is that with ever expanding BVR capabilities, shorter range aircraft reliant on aerial refuelling become more vulnerable. I.e. pop the completely non-stealthy tankers and thus reduce range of light/medium fighters.

    Hence more reliance on long range due to internal fuel capacity. And this means heavier fighters. I think from this perspective. F-35 is a bit behind the ball.

    Heavy fighters can also be more stealthy due to more room for internal bays.

    Of course Su-27/30 isn’t stealthy but its successors certainly are (T-50, J-20).

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2359049
    thobbes
    Participant

    teer, good post.

    I read a similar article many moons ago where Western pilots discussed their experiences with MiG-29.

    Apparently the early MiG-29 cockpit was very labour intensive with a lot of “heads down” actions (i.e. looking at instrument panel) compared to Western aircraft of the time (this was pre MFD).

    The author wondered whether this would be an issue with pilots who have been trained to fly such aircraft from the outset.

    However certainly spatial awareness isn’t as as comprehensive as jets with bubble canopies and well laid out efficient cockpits layouts.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 2,012 total)