He was referring to the PTVs (personal televisions)…not the airline/aircraft itself.;)
Never knew LH had one of them.
Indeed they do…in fact, they have a fleet of private jets, including:
x3 Cessna Citation CJ1+ (D-ILHA as seen above is one of these!)
x2 Cessna Citation CJ3
x2 Cessna Citation XLS+
For those people that can afford it or perhaps live in a remote location that is not served all that well, a Lufthansa Private Jet can be used to connect onto a long-haul flight or vice versa in Frankfurt, Munich or Zurich.
Great photos there Keith, thanks for sharing.:)
The Titan Airways livery is stunning…although not quite as nice as their previous one which was far more colourful!
Does anyone know who owns/operates G-BVLJ…I noticed it is in the livery of Air Botswana (without the titles!), who used to operate BAe 146s in the past, am just curious to know what happened to it after it left them?
You would probably be best to call the airport itself and ask them for that kind of information, especially if their website is lacking in clarity.
I would imagine they would probably make improvements to the car park before the end of July so that they can make some additional revenue from those that are choosing to fly from the airport during the peak of the summer months, but this is of course just pure speculation at this stage.:)
Lets hope that along with a new re-branding comes a new corporate culture change too; changing a logo/livery won’t solve deeper issues that exist within the company.
And, as long as they don’t use the people who did Finnair and/or JAL’s new livery, then we should be ok…:D
Can you imagine if they did, something like this perhaps (see below)?
Old news…article is dated Wednesday, 21 July 2010?:confused:
Ms Bechaz said she was not thrown around because her seat belt was tight.
Sadly, and this may come across as a tad harsh, but I have very little sympathy for those people who get injured, especially those that choose to ignore the safety briefing…which quite clearly states that even if the seat-belt sign is turned off, you should still have your seat-belt fastened if you are seated.
£80 total coast. Ok they add £15 for checked in bag, £6 card fee, £6 online check-in but so what, it’s only £80. Bargain.
Of course you meant to say it cost you £107 in total when you take into consideration all the additional extras, so not quite the £80 “bargain” that you claim!:mad::diablo:
Did you always intend on going to Barcelona as well, or did you choose this option because it was cheaper?
If the latter, how do you intend on getting from Malaga to Barcelona, and have you considered the cost of that; will probably work out to be just as expensive (if not more!) than a doing a return flight from Malaga, so again…not quite the £80 “bargain” that you claim!?
Think that probably gives you an idea of why people moan about Ryanair…
Does it not also depend on the bilateral agreements between each country?
I don’t know anything about the particular aircraft you feature in your OP, but say for example, an airline chooses to charter, damp/wet-lease an aircraft for a particular length of time, if the operator of that aircraft is from a different country, the registration will still show the country that aircraft is officially registered in, not the one it is necessarily flying in.
Take Manx2.com for example, based on the Isle of Man (UK), they fly a small fleet of Let 410’s & Metroliners…but you do not see their aircraft holding the M- registration. The reason being is because these aircraft are in fact operated by various European aircraft operators, because there is a bilateral agreement between most EU countries that permits the operation of each other’s aircraft in each others countries.
I might be wrong, but just a thought.:o
Many Happy Returns Bmused.:)
Also, the 757 does not have the capability to “dump” fuel like other aircraft, hence why it was “circling to burn-off fuel so that it will not be overweight when it lands at Heathrow”.;)
Some really fantastic shots there.:D
Certainly had me fooled…until his voice began to change!:D:diablo:
Certainly had me fooled…until his voice began to change!:D:diablo:
And in terms of the greater argument the CEO’s bonus does not seen relevant.
So its fair for a CEO of a company to take a considerable bonus, whilst he is asking his main workforce to make changes because the company is in financial difficulty…is it?:confused:
Ok, so I know WW is no longer CEO of BA so to speak, but still…it smacks of sheer arrogance and hypocrisy, if you ask me.:mad:
If you’re a CEO and your company is facing tough times, the last thing that should be considered is bonuses!
Same applies to the banks…bunch of crooks!
BA is not a workers commune or a co-operative. Let me turn the tables here. Are YOU seriously suggesting that a company owner/manager DOES NOT have the right to do exactly that, whilst confirming to employment laws and contractual obligations?
No, indeed BA is not a commune or co-operative, and no, I am not suggesting that a company owner/manager does not have the right to do it, but what I would expect is for the managers to approach the workers and perhaps ask for their involvement in the process, as it is often the workforce that are good at finding areas of waste and expense that can be reduced in order to save on costs, rather than immediately hitting their pay packets and/or terms and conditions of employment.
Another Apple culture moment: “Empower employees to make a difference.”
I would not bow down and say yes, if I didn’t like what was being offered. I would leave.
But being realistic SH, you wouldn’t simply just leave without knowing that there was a job available for you to leave too as you would be cutting your nose to spite your face and in this case. Many of these people have families to support and are not going to want make their own position even worse off, and neither should they be made to either!?
Again, I question WW’s acceptance of his bonus…despite his hard work in getting the merger with IB through and establishing IAG, he should really think twice about taking it, otherwise it will just serve to cause even more problems. But then again, like most other CEO’s, he’s motivated by money and greed, and as long as he’s looked after ok…he couldn’t give a s**t or care less about anyone else, a truly evil man!:mad:
In a strong, healthy, growing economy the employee holds the strong hand.
Not necessarily true…whats to stop BA from imposing further changes to the workers even if the economy is strong, healthy and growing and they are making a profit, nothing.