dark light

Peter L

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Griffon Spitfire #1371991
    Peter L
    Participant

    Being flown by Ray Hanna?

     http://www.global-air.com/global/graphics/applause-clapping_sm.gif
    in reply to: Griffon Spitfire #1372001
    Peter L
    Participant

    🙂 We need more people with such a great sense of humour on this forum. Almost had me believing him for a minute there….

    With user name like yours I should have expected agreement. The MkXII is a MkV with a comedy nose!

    ..could you tell the difference from 50ft?

    You bet your sweet bippy I could. Been modeling Spitfires for fifty years and I reckon I must have done them all. Always have to force myself when it comes to the MkXII though. It’s like it needs a paper bag over it’s head. :rolleyes:

    p.s. What in heaven’s name is a Spitfire doing below 10,000ft :confused:

    in reply to: Griffon Spitfire #1372265
    Peter L
    Participant

    You think so? I would have said the desert filter-fitted Spit Vs.

    Nah! The tropical filter looks good on the V. The XII has a nose too short for a proper Griffon and too long for a Merlin, it’s kind of halfway. The tail is too small for the nose, and the four blader looks all wrong on a Griffon. It has the pointy rudder in combination with clipped wings, and the asymetric radiator is too small for a Griffin Spit. Out of the whole Spitfire family, which I otherwise love without exception let me say, the MkXII is the one they should have locked in the atic and fed on bread and water. Back to the foxhole. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Griffon Spitfire #1372413
    Peter L
    Participant

    It doesn’t matter whether Merlin or Griffon flavour, a Spitfire is a Spitfire and the breed is almost uniformly beautiful. The Mk XII bucks the trend; it is an ugly duckling. There’s one in every family and the Mk XII is it. Ducking for cover.

    in reply to: Dambuster's re-make ? Discuss #1377546
    Peter L
    Participant

    The Telegraph features editor is either having a slow news day or has a poor memory. The same newspaper ran this story ten years ago, but then Mel Gibson, not David Frost, was the the big name attached to it. It was a hoax then, probably is now.

    We can only imagine what a Mel Gibson version would be like. B25s of the six seventeenth BG dropping supplys to the beleagured civilians of the Rhur valley, caught in the deluge created by the evil genius Ernst Stavros “Butcher” Harris, played of course by Alan Rickman. Pity about poor old Ronnie Barker; in a David Frost version he would have been a shoe in for the part.

    in reply to: New paint scheme for Sea Fury C-FGAT #1341910
    Peter L
    Participant

    I could even get used to the idea of a non-Centaurus version 😉

    Is this not Centaurus powered then? does that explain the prop? A real aeroplane or what!

    in reply to: Hughie Green ..The Pilot? (Be wary: old thread) #1354013
    Peter L
    Participant

    Bring on Monica Rose – that’s what I say. Wonder if she’s still alive?

    I’m afraid her web bio doesn’t hold out much hope;

    Chirpy Cockney junior accounts clerk who appeared, aged 15, on Double Your Money as a contestant, winning £8 answering questions on Famous Women. Hughie Green asked her back to become a hostess on the show and the subsequent The Sky’s the Limit. Sadly, Rose committed suicide some years later.

    http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/adults/quiz/hughiegreen.jpg
    in reply to: "The Few" Movie and other new air movies #1414330
    Peter L
    Participant

    Hi

    Peter L

    This is where I commit Forum suicide and suggest that perhaps it doesn’t matter if the Spits/Hurricanes are sans Cannons or not – the average punter wouldn’t notice………If only 1% of the audience knows anything about aircraft then why does it matter a toss if the aircraft has cannons or not

    I absolutely agree John. As I maintained, Joe Public would accept the cgi aircraft in Correlli’s Mandolin as real, so well was it done, and probably wouldn’t know a Ju87 from a Lambretta. The producers made a concious decision to get it right, and succeeded IMO.

    Very often it is no more difficult to do a thing right than it is to do it wrong, and in cgi terms this is self evident. Sometimes it’s actually easier to get it right than to get it wrong, and if it can be done right it should be IMO. Anoraks like me will enjoy it all the more and Joe public will enjoy it no less. Result = a larger audience.

    in reply to: "The Few" Movie and other new air movies #1414663
    Peter L
    Participant

    There was an attempt by mel gibson to remake the dambusters about 10 years ago using CGI for the lancs there was an article i think in ‘the sun’ about it at the time and they said it would be a computer generated farce as the story would no doubt be another ‘how the americans won the war single handed’ film etc.

    Mel Gibson certainly has previous convictions. My bet is that the 617BG would fly over in B25’s to drop relief supplies to belegured Germans, trapped by rising floodwaters caused by evil criminal mastermind Dr Bounce Wallis’s attempt to corner the world market in black labradors.

    On the question of the removal of cannon, surely that’s where cgi is best. The cannon can be digitally removed without need to modify the aircraft.

    My nomination for best use of 100 percent cgi aircraft in a movie goes to the Stuka attack in Captain Correli’s Mandolin. The aircraft were shown only in brief glimpses. If I didn’t know there are no flying examples of Ju87 I might have been convinced, as I am sure Joe Public was

    in reply to: Your Models #1424418
    Peter L
    Participant

    http://www.wwimodeler.com/esc/f/f1.jpg

    Not WW part Dieux coz I don’t do that, but mine all mine. Farman F40 scratchbuilt in the manly scale (1:48)

    http://www.wwimodeler.com

    in reply to: General Discussion #381815
    Peter L
    Participant

    I should be out on the trike. Instead I shall be taking it to bits because the electrickery is b*ggered

    in reply to: Saturday Night 30degrees!! #1947478
    Peter L
    Participant

    I should be out on the trike. Instead I shall be taking it to bits because the electrickery is b*ggered

    in reply to: How bad can Discovery Wings get? #1342619
    Peter L
    Participant

    The best so far was describing the Lanc as a nuclear bomber.

    in reply to: 65 hp Versus the Atlantic #1342623
    Peter L
    Participant

    O/T (2) On an unrelated matter I never worked out exactly where RAF West Kirby was although a lot of people I knew in England seem to have been demobbed through there.

    Forgive me if I have misunderstood the problem, but does this help?

    http://www.westwight.clara.co.uk/MapWK1.jpg
    in reply to: Ugliest Aircraft. #1344944
    Peter L
    Participant

    ….. Avro Bison …….. Blackburn Dart…… Vickers Vernon …. Westland Walrus.

    Give me an old chair leg, a Stanley knife and a decent drawing of any one of them and I’ll play happily for weeks. Ugly aircraft make the best models.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 22 total)