I’ve took a bunch of pics of the Hughes B25 being taken apart. The interior had bizarre bamboo wallpaper everywhere & the oxygen tank was a bit mickey mouse. It was a full size bottle laid on it’s side in the tail & basically held in place by a pair of stout hose clamps. If the nose gear had ever collapsed the tank would have exited through the nose.


Top of bomb bay was lowered to accommodate a bed on top of it:

In related news:
Chemtrail discharge valve wasn’t shut for take-off ๐


Pilot reports he is out of hospital & is minus part of his left leg after a couple of surgeries. Fully intends to get back to flying when he gets an aftermarket lower leg fitted.
No surprise there was several pieces of sheared t/w pin found. The last one I worked on had so many sheered pins back there it probably affected the W&B.
Looked at an atlas lately?
Why? Is Australia no longer where Australians originate? That small island off the West coast of NZ?
I stopped reading when it mentioned the story came out of Australia.
Never saw it, it doesn’t exist, must have been a weather balloon… ๐

[ATTACH=CONFIG]261892[/ATTACH]
Right here…
All he has to do it look up the complete serial # on the Baugher database & it will tell him where it is or where it ended it’s days. If his #299 is actually 62-4299, it’s at Travis AFB.
& if his 425 is 62-4425, it’s at the American Legion Post 325 in Blissfield, Michigan.
The first *gotcha* is Chapter 1, para 2:
The restoration of ex-military aircraft varies considerably from the transition of a just out of service aircraft into the civil environment to a more substantial recovery of a severely damaged World War II aircraft, complete with bullet holes, fire damage and corrosion. Accordingly, the aircraft will have different demands to ensure that airworthiness is achieved to allow a Permit to Fly to be issued. As such, each ex-military aircraft is regarded as being unique. Whilst a number of the type may have qualified for a Permit to Fly, the circumstances surrounding the nature of the individual aircraftโs history requires separate consideration. Each aircraft therefore has its own Airworthiness Approval Note (AAN) covering the history, any work done on transition to the civil system and the conditions associated with the issue of the Permit.
Translation: Just because that bloke over there got one sorted & flying doesn’t mean we’ll approve your identical one over here. ๐
What incident does this refer to?
Occupancy A-3.5.1
Following an accident in 1986 to a civil registered ex-military aircraft operating on a Permit to Fly, where eleven of the fourteen occupants were killed, the Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB) focused attention on the difficulties faced by the CAA in satisfying themselves as to the airworthiness of an ex-military aircraft which has not been civil type certificated and does not have the continued airworthiness support required by ICAO Annex 8 for civil certification. The AAIB recommendation stated that
“When an aircraft is to be operated on a Permit to Fly the Permit should specify the maximum number of seats authorised to be fitted to the aircraft.” The response from the CAA was to define an overall occupancy limit in each case and endorse the Permit to Fly accordingly.
I have a thing for old hangars. These two are at Santa Barbara:
http://goletahistory.com/two-hangars/
They show up better using *birdseye* on Bing maps than on Google Earth.
The one I really like is a recreation. The Rocketeer hangar at Santa Maria was moved & bought up to code after filming & is now part of the museum there.
That interior color looks suspiciously British…
