dark light

12jaguar

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 1,773 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Short Stirling #1189904
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Hi,

    Looks like there is still plenty of space in the hanger for you to fill…..!

    DS

    If only, the RAF are kind enough to let us have workshop space, however I fear that the hangar floor will soon be out of bounds to us:(

    John

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1190039
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Hi all

    I was going to post this on the Stirling Project update thread, but now seems as good a time as any:p

    It’s only a start, but tall trees from small acorns grow

    John

    in reply to: Lancaster ED715 #1194426
    12jaguar
    Participant

    John,

    Not ‘Bump’ – try posting your query on the RAF Commands forum at http://www.rafcommands.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?s=&daysprune=&f=1.

    (Unless you have already, but if you have I can’t find it.)

    Brian

    I haven’t but will do so

    thanks for the advice

    John

    in reply to: Lancaster ED715 #1194590
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Bump;)

    in reply to: A cynic's view of RIAT's cancellation. #1200886
    12jaguar
    Participant

    I don’t think there is any conspiracy here, I just think the organisers didn’t want a repetition of the Silverstone debacle of a few years ago.

    in reply to: Jaguars at Cosford. #1211800
    12jaguar
    Participant

    They’d need new wings first:eek:

    in reply to: Jaguars at Cosford. #1212175
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Apart from the kit that is common to the Harrier fleet………

    Forgot about that….:o

    in reply to: Jaguars at Cosford. #1212323
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Hi Peter

    Can’t speak for now, but up until 2004 the Jaguar Maintenance Policy Statement had a section devoted to the Policy for Ground Instructional Airframes and particularly the mainplanes. Some of the wings were to be kept in as good a condition as possible for a potential return to service, I wouldn’t be surprised if these aircraft were kept at a reasonable level of serviceability ‘in case of’. Aside from that there is no reason to cannibalise the aircraft as they are no longer in service but should be representative of a front line aircraft for instructional purposes.

    John

    in reply to: XH558 receives permission to fly to Waddington #1214312
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Hi Chaps

    I’ve been working flat out on the Vulcan manuals to get CAA clearance. As of this moment in time we’ve (MA) still not had any formal acceptance of these and therefore no PtF as yet. Imminent though:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Aviation Archaeology/Wreck Recovery. #1221557
    12jaguar
    Participant

    BTW Attn Jaguar12 – I contacted the Stirling Project a while back about a Stirling crash site in Gloucestershire which I know the location of and had the contact details for the land owner. I met a guy who’d been walking the field for many years and has boxes full of bits from it in his attic. I never heard back from TSP so I have no idea if the lead was of any use.

    PM sent

    John

    in reply to: Aviation Archaeology/Wreck Recovery. #1222489
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Whilst I recognise that this can be an emotive subject, I can only vouch for the fact that without items recovered from crash sites, the Stirling Project would find much of it’s activities virtually impossible. With an almost total lack of drawings the only way we can progress is to ‘reverse engineer’ from recovered items. We have often found little gems which helps to fill in our understanding of the design of a particular component and having previously been involved with digs through a different organisation, if properly researched and displayed recovered items can add greatly to the memory of the aircrew that lived (and died) in the type. I personally would not have anything to do with anyone/group who recovered items for personal gain or glory or would do so only to add to a personal collection.

    Thats my twopenneth worth:)

    in reply to: WW2 Bombers #1223311
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Hi 668

    please follow the link:D

    John

    in reply to: Your aviation connection? #1224026
    12jaguar
    Participant

    No family connections to aviation, however it all went downhill when I discovered Airfix:D

    ATC
    Modelmaker
    Cpl Airframe Technician RAF
    Joint keeper of aircraft for a time at Fenland Aircraft Museum
    Stirling Project
    and restoring Chipmunk WP927

    I keep telling the wife and kids that “I’m not an anorak”:p

    in reply to: Newark Cockpit Fest #1229472
    12jaguar
    Participant

    If you come, then come with no preconceptions – no intention to win. If you do, then it is surely just a bonus!

    Bruce

    I think that just hits the nail on the head. I for one am just there to show off the Stirling to Joe Public, a vote from your peers should be a feather in your cap and it would be a shame and a sad day if people were to stay away if the whole idea of Cockpifest were to descend to a popularity contest.

    in reply to: Newark Cockpit Fest #1229487
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Hi all

    This was the second year that the Stirling project attended and this time we were able to support both days. We are lucky in some respects in that we are currently kindly hosted by RAF Wyton and other than the cost of electricity and the accomodation we receive no other help. If this is perceived as being unfair, well that is one persons view. The main reason we attend is that as we are a Charitable organisation and behind the wire at Wyton so to speak we have to spread the good word by hitting the road. The chance to meet up and swap anecdotes and offer and receive advice is very welcome and I for one didn’t propose to enter with the stated purpose of winning anything. Maybe it is time to take the competetive edge out of the proceedings, after all why are we there?

    IMHO If you take prizes away I think attendance boils down to the following:
    To bring something new to the Public and to give them a chance to get a lot closer to aircraft than they would do otherwise, to show off our handiwork (especially if there is a before and after show) and the social side of the event. Maybe the question should be what does/should Cockpitfest mean to you?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 1,773 total)