dark light

hampden98

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,446 through 2,460 (of 2,685 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Torpedos and Bismarck #1865600
    hampden98
    Participant

    I noticed the other day when watching the filme Cruel Sea the word “INERT” stamped quite clearly on the side of the Depth Charges in the scene where they fire them off to attack a sub. Funny but I’ve watched that film so many times and never spotted it. It’s so obvious! A bit like the Star Wars stormtrooper head on door frame gaf.

    in reply to: General Discussion #281287
    hampden98
    Participant

    Wiping the slate clean in terms of what we know happened in ww2 and the American effort I think it would be entirely possible that we could have won the war.

    So there we are alone facing adversity, so we need to change our ideas and tactics. Perhaps notable leaders are sacked, less prominant persons appointed to critical areas. This could have a major impact to our tactics and technology.

    The war may be a more long drawn out process. From 5 to maybe 10 or more years to resolve. A lot can happen (technologically) in that time. We do not necessarily have to invade in 44.

    Perhaps we may have seen an escallation of development of Jet and computer technology. This could lead to some form of low level precision capability for striking ships or uboats. Maybe with guided munitions, hunter killer torpedoes or limited nuclear arms.

    We may resort to chemical and biological attacks on Germany.

    Lets not assume we will fight the same war without the Americans.

    in reply to: WWII Invasion – without the US ? #1865676
    hampden98
    Participant

    Wiping the slate clean in terms of what we know happened in ww2 and the American effort I think it would be entirely possible that we could have won the war.

    So there we are alone facing adversity, so we need to change our ideas and tactics. Perhaps notable leaders are sacked, less prominant persons appointed to critical areas. This could have a major impact to our tactics and technology.

    The war may be a more long drawn out process. From 5 to maybe 10 or more years to resolve. A lot can happen (technologically) in that time. We do not necessarily have to invade in 44.

    Perhaps we may have seen an escallation of development of Jet and computer technology. This could lead to some form of low level precision capability for striking ships or uboats. Maybe with guided munitions, hunter killer torpedoes or limited nuclear arms.

    We may resort to chemical and biological attacks on Germany.

    Lets not assume we will fight the same war without the Americans.

    in reply to: Old Black and White picture of Vulcan breaking apart #1059949
    hampden98
    Participant

    Thanks for all the replies, makes for a very interesting and thought provoking thread.

    hampden98
    Participant

    Very interesting, thanks.

    hampden98
    Participant

    How do cable cutters, like those fitted to lancasters, actually work?
    Pictures just show a small pipes, spikes on the leading edge of the wing.

    What happens to the balloons? Do they just drift off or is there a safety mechanism that brings them back to earth?

    in reply to: A Whitley story…in scale #220677
    hampden98
    Participant

    Totally amazing and a little depressing knowing I’ll never be that good.
    Love the little details in the turrets.

    in reply to: Photographic event with Lancaster 'Just Jane' #494405
    hampden98
    Participant

    Any chance you could `bomb her up` a bit?
    What about a crew in full gear?

    in reply to: Whatever Happened to…………..?? #1067806
    hampden98
    Participant

    While watching the credits for Piece of Cake I noticed Carl Schofield, a name which rings a bell in the 80’s 90’s.
    Is he still around and what did he used to fly?

    in reply to: Elusive propliner leaves uk #1075318
    hampden98
    Participant

    Is that the same aircraft that appeared at Wroughton for the Great Warbirds air display many moons ago?

    in reply to: WW2 Bomber Airfield Buildings. #1083543
    hampden98
    Participant

    The airfield research group forum is the mecca for airfield buildings. They are a very helpful bunch.

    Thanks, I’ll check out their website. ATB.

    in reply to: WW2 Bomber Airfield Buildings. #1083557
    hampden98
    Participant

    1. BRITISH AIRFIELD BUILDINGS OFTHE SECOND WORLD WAR – Graham Buchan Innes Midland Publishing Ltd ISBN 1 85780 026 5
    (in the AVIATION POCKET GUIDE SERIES)

    profusely illustrated but no measurements

    2. BRITISH MILITARY AIRFIELD ARCHITECTURE – Paul Francis Patrick Stephens Ltd ISBN 185260 462 X

    a much more scholarly book – plenty of pics but also plans and dimensions etc

    Both those books are on Amazon. Thanks, I’ll check them out.

    in reply to: You just HAVE to watch this #409040
    hampden98
    Participant

    Looks fishey. Why would you be filming that aircraft just on the off-chance it might take flight?

    in reply to: What was this airplane I saw? #560620
    hampden98
    Participant

    Yep, that’s the one. Funny I was going to say it looked a bit like an Islander. Thanks.

    in reply to: Oops…police lose their drone #409142
    hampden98
    Participant

    £14’000 and it doesn’t float. Bit of a design floor that.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,446 through 2,460 (of 2,685 total)