dark light

hampden98

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 2,685 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hypothetical, I kow, BUT? #1848655
    hampden98
    Participant

    I predict the Hydrogen Reactor and Faster Than Light engines.
    Both of these have some semblance of fact about them. Hydrogen Reactors are being studied but as yet a sustained reaction has not been made.
    The Hadron Collider has observed faster than light particles but as yet these cannot be ascertained as fact or anomaly.

    in reply to: SPOTTED 2014 #860641
    hampden98
    Participant

    Lockheed Constellation low over Yateley 18:45.
    Amazingly quiet aircraft.

    in reply to: The Last Film You Watched….. IV #1848710
    hampden98
    Participant

    The missus bought it and I thoroughly enjoyed it

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2431286/

    in reply to: SPOTTED 2014 #861882
    hampden98
    Participant

    Daks , Vulcan , Connie, and a lot more Farnborough Rocking 🙂

    At about 4:45pm today two fast jets in close formation buzzed the M3 at Junction 4a. Did you see them and can say what they were?
    Still nothing over Yateley 🙁

    in reply to: Stupid people running with the bulls. Again. #1848776
    hampden98
    Participant

    I’m in two minds about this.
    Is it cruel? No more than herding a frightened animal into a slaughter house.
    At least the bull is free to express itself, goes down fighting. Has the opportunity to inflict some retribution.

    in reply to: Voyager 1 #1848918
    hampden98
    Participant

    It will probably be found in several million years by humans who have forgotten where it came from and use it to claim there is alien life out there.
    Either that or get destroyed by the Klingons (again).

    in reply to: Voyager 1 #1849000
    hampden98
    Participant

    So what will happen to Voyager eventually?
    Presumably it will get picked up in the gravitational pull of a planet, enter it’s orbit and reenter crashing onto said planet?
    Will it ever return, admittedly on a wide orbit, back to Earth – assuming earth is still there of course. I’m talking billions of years?

    in reply to: Not quite as near a miss as it looks…….? #491858
    hampden98
    Participant

    I’ve never had a go around. How much of a delay does that cause?

    in reply to: Yank bomber boys in Norfolk. #867777
    hampden98
    Participant

    Was the B24 more prone to crashing on takeoff than the B17?
    In `Target Berlin` by Ethell and Price that mission also saw the loss of a B24 during takeoff.
    I’ve not heard any mention of B17 losses during takeoff in any of the books I have read.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go? (2014) #867790
    hampden98
    Participant
    in reply to: Drone #1849052
    hampden98
    Participant

    What I find fascinating is how man has not only mastered flight. But given a computer chip the ability to have total controlled flight.
    Watch this.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2itwFJCgFQ
    I just love the way he throws it (the drone) into the air and it just stabilizes and hangs there. Then flies around the room with a wine glass balance on it’s head.
    Total controlled flight.

    in reply to: Looking like both Lancs may do Duxford #867918
    hampden98
    Participant

    They could get one over on Just Jane if they got both Lancs to land and park them next to their static example.
    I wonder if the RAF will give her an escort into UK airspace? If not they should do. A nice bit of good PR for the RAF with the opportunity for some interesting photo’s which they could sell for the Benevolent Fund?

    in reply to: Wellington at Brooklands #868028
    hampden98
    Participant

    Yes, but what did they use for the mockup? The structure looks like original Wellington. Maybe new manufactured to the same standards.

    in reply to: Wellington at Brooklands #868030
    hampden98
    Participant

    I took my two lads (8 & 11 years) there last month. The walk through Wellington section was one of the highlights for them as it gave a good appreciation of how it would have been. They were slightly horrified that all you had between you & the outside world (& bullets) was some fabric. It definitely increased their understanding & interest. A lesson there for other museums perhaps.

    I visited Brooklands a few weeks ago. They had a very simple demo of a bomb release with a bomb release `tit` to drop a wooden bomb. Kids loved it.
    I also enjoyed the walk through. Too much emphasis is placed on real and realism. Mock ups, interaction (mechanical, not computer) and models all go down well with children, myself included.
    One of the things I miss about the IWM Lambeth is they seem to have removed all the models.
    Used to love staring at the 1:72nd soldiers storming Gallipoli or opening the trenches (they must have been victorian, press lever see inside) to see the soldiers inside.

    in reply to: Chemtrails – the explanation. #1849097
    hampden98
    Participant

    After reading the article I realised I didn’t understand a word of it.
    So it must be true.
    BTW what’s a chem trail?

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 2,685 total)