dark light

Aerosquip

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Type-C flying helmets #806997
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    Good luck if you have a bonk on the head in a C type. It was nice to see pilots wearing something a bit more substantial that the DC cloth helmet or the leather and hardshell Campbell at Duxford recently.

    in reply to: Projects Wants And Trades 2019 #808495
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    I’m looking for B-17 turbos..bit of a long shot but I have a friend in Phoenix, USA, who would like some. Thanks in advance!

    in reply to: Canadian Mossie up for sale??? #823434
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    No proof, only the bomber pilots joshing the fighter pilots that if it had been on the flight then as it was a twin, ‘the bomber boys’ would fly it.. as you could imagine the twin engine jet guys disagreed (Jag/Typh/Torn)!

    in reply to: Canadian Mossie up for sale??? #823544
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    BBMF do not operate aircraft or a are geared up to support aircraft on the civilian register, that, and for many other reasons this wouldn’t happen any time soon.
    Agent K

    BBMF were about to get the BAe Mosquito T3 the year it crashed.

    in reply to: Meteor last flight #827302
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    You beat me to it.

    in reply to: Spitfire LA255 #768600
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    BBMF looked after this Spitfire and it was made cosmetically sound while at Coningsby. It was a bit of a basket case, iirc the wings were pretty jiggered (technical term), no one at BBMF thought it was a go’er at that time, but with enough money…

    in reply to: SOAF/RAFO BAC 1-11 #791233
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    I thought I spotted a 1-11 tail last year near the Royal flight end of Seeb, there was also a few decaying Skyvans hiding in a thicket near the taxi way.. happy childhood memories of BAC 1-11 trips to Salalah and Thumrait.

    in reply to: BBC Test Pilot Series #792459
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    I watched the series as a youngster, only to wind-up working at BD with one of the stars of the show. Strange how life works out, top bloke to boot.

    in reply to: Oman 1978 Beach Terror attack #2142049
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    It was an attack against European Airwork employees who were employed to work on SOAF aircraft..

    in reply to: How To Become A BBMF Pilot? #816152
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    The ‘fighter’ pilots will come from the resident FJ squadrons at Coningsby or occasionally and unusually Cranwell if they are on a QFI tour. The bomber crews (Pilot/Flight Eng) will come from multi engines, so Waddington, Cranwell and Brize. The Navs (WSO) are usually from Tornado, are desk bound or train rear crews at Cranwell. Rear Dakota WSOp’s were from the rotary world at one point.
    There are a few ex-BBMF guys flying warbirds, but not that many. Most don’t do it after leaving BBMF because they have careers to go to. All would love to do it again. 🙂

    in reply to: C-47 under Tower Bridge VE Day 1945/ Strafing #819224
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    …and that’s how the AC-47 was born. ?. It’s possibly doable, but you’d have to be Houdini to get any sort of shot off in that space, and, where would the empty cases go? Much better to leg it down the back and rain down hellfire from the open cargo door.

    in reply to: Replica Spitfire crash in Germany #821584
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    If you’re involved in a fire, even wearing two layers (nomex/cotton, aramid/gortex), gloves and boots there’s still a good chance you will receive burns to areas of the body, however they will normally be classed as survivable. If you’re not wearing FR kit you’ll come off a lot worse. I have been involved with most of the kit other posters have mentioned for many years, I have done burn tests on thermo dummies and seen the results of the various materials and configurations after real crashes/ejections as well. Flying clothing is always going to be a compromise of protection, weight, durability, comfort, cost, etc (I cannot comment on ground based I.e tank crew FR kit but would image the same goes). It is designed to give the maximum amount of protection whilst meeting or exceeding a rigorous set of standards/requirements. Yes, years ago the older generation of suits were repaired using nylon thread, but they are now repaired using at aramid thread (FR thread). Nomex can be laundered, it is not an ‘application’ like water proofing a tent, but a fabric, various weights are available. I agree with the above poster though, you only get one body, protect it, don’t buy second hand. I’m constantly amazed that there are still people out there who think nothing of splashing hard cash on an aeroplane but won’t do the same for their own protection. “Yeah, it’s great innit, I got it off e-bay..”.

    in reply to: Replica Spitfire crash in Germany #822540
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    I hope the pilot makes a fully recovery.

    First, apologies if this is slightly OT. Secondly, what you wear when you go flying is a personal choice, just some personal musings below.

    Just because these kinds of accidents are comparatively rare doesn’t mean aviators should disregard their own safety. The old aviation favourites “it will never happen to me” and ‘sods law’ still play a role in GA flying as much as they do in historic and military aviation. Dress to survive should be in everyone’s minds, wether you’re about to strap on a Spitfire or cross the channel in a microlight.

    I’m not saying that all steely eyed 172 pilots should wear helmets, coveralls, long sleeve and leg under garments, gloves and stout boots, but there is nothing wrong in looking out for yourself, after all, no one will do it for you (unless you’re a military aviator). 😉

    Warbird aircrew not wearing helmets? The majority of high performance Warbird pilots I have worked with or talked to wear either a historic looking modern hard shell helmet with goggles (Campbell), a commercial helmet (Alpha or MSA) or a WW2 leather original. There’s a reason why modern helmets are made of carbon fibre and not leather – our understanding of impact injuries and impact protection has improved greatly in the last 75 years. A glancing impact whilst wearing a hard shell helmet is infinitely safer than a bash on the noggin wearing a leather helmet or DC headset. Is it going to help you survive a high speed crash? Probably not, but for a nose over, bird strike, bail out, etc then I’d personally prefer to wear something that can absorb most of the impact for me.

    Somebody mentioned flying coveralls earlier – no two are the same, if you wear one, make sure it’s made of Nomex or meta aramid. There are a few cheaper suits available, these won’t be made of fire resistant/retardant materials and will be as much use as a chocolate fire guard in a flash fire (the purpose of the suit is to give you a few extra seconds in which to escape). If you’re going to wear a coverall, wear cotton underwear as a base layer, I’d recommend cotton long johns/long sleeve t-shirts, from experience this can be ‘quite warm’ on the rare occasion the sun shines in the UK, but it’s better than the alternative. Also, consider foot ware and gloves suitable for aircraft type. Pilot flight equipment (or ppe for aviators) is out there and available, please pm me if you’d like to discuss.

    in reply to: BBMF Facebook page blocked to non members #854349
    Aerosquip
    Participant

    When Kelly and Yve set up the page it was open to all, it’s now a closed group due to trolling and other ‘activities’. join the group and it should work.[ATTACH=CONFIG]246406[/ATTACH]

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)