dark light

skycruiser

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Auringy and JEA criticised #708832
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Quite right. I wasn’t trying to say that the crew were in the clear.

    I know mate, I could see an incident coming with this company unless they made some big changes in their operation.

    in reply to: Auringy and JEA criticised #711791
    skycruiser
    Participant

    [QUOTE=wysiwyg]ATR’s are notorious for problematic airframe icing. QUOTE]

    Therefore, they should have been twice as switched on in icing conditions to prevent this problem. I am not suprised though.

    in reply to: Remember # 103 …. The HOT towel #713521
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Cathay Pacific still has the hot towels….great.

    in reply to: Shares For Sale in a Jet Provost Mk3A #436527
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Christ, If I lived back in the UK I would have two!!!!

    in reply to: VS Denies A346 Rumors #725017
    skycruiser
    Participant

    I don’t think they will go down the 747-400 route.There is a shortage of second hand B747-400.
    Sounds like a bit of bartering to get a rock bottom price for some new machines.

    in reply to: Friday's Farnborough….the commercial lot #726195
    skycruiser
    Participant

    nice shots mate.

    in reply to: SAA at Farnborough #727264
    skycruiser
    Participant

    What about the pilots. Are they pilots from CX or Boeing’s ?

    CX crew.

    in reply to: Have Ryanair Finally Lost it? LMAO! #729420
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Why, when it comes to Ryanair…..I am never surprised…….This airline should be grounded.

    in reply to: SAA at Farnborough #729423
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Cathay Pacific will have a B747-400 at Farnborough this weekend. It will be doing a couple of flybys , one at 350kts.

    in reply to: Virgin to Order up to 30 Airbus A340-600's #633296
    skycruiser
    Participant

    For example, during the SARS crisis Virgin were able to operate the A346 to HKG with much more freight than a 744 can carry which in itself was enough to make the route profitable. Any passengers carried were purely a bonus. This would not have been the case with a 744. This was one of the many reasons why I was so keen to get on the bus.

    Ian,

    some of our many reasons for the B744 was Days off, excellent destinations, lifestyle, golf courses down route to name but a few………not cargo capacity…..HEEEEEEEEE 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 only kidding mate.

    in reply to: Larger 747 remains possibility says Boeing #634668
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Cathay Pacific are interested, but Boeing said “we will build it for you if you stump up the money for the new aircraft”.

    It doesn’t quite work like that.

    in reply to: East Midlands, ten years ago #635784
    skycruiser
    Participant

    great look back in time, thanks

    in reply to: 777/7E7 possible orders and Farnborough #636464
    skycruiser
    Participant

    why would CX want to get rid of there A346s already? Not satisfied with its performance?

    I am afraid Cathay have not been happy with the A340-600 for a number of reasons. Reliability and performance are just a couple.

    in reply to: Bad aimanship, stupidity or both?? #436740
    skycruiser
    Participant

    brings back happy thoughts….ohhhh, the old Lutons. I logged over 400 hours in JG and EA

    in reply to: Regret… #638626
    skycruiser
    Participant

    hurry back Kev.

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 768 total)