dark light

skycruiser

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: North Pole Fly-Over Question #727117
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Cathay Pacific’s HKG-JFK will be a Polar route, due to start on the 1st June.

    in reply to: Favourite Airport? #733425
    skycruiser
    Participant

    I would say Hong Kong as it’s so pax friendly, lots of light and open spaces. Beer is a bit expensive though.

    in reply to: Cold Wet Sunshine ? – Yep been to Manchester again ! #635827
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Originally posted by Whiskey Delta
    I’ve seen a number of pictures of similar cargo aircraft that are also referred to as 744. The passenger version has the extended upperdeck but this cargo version does not. Are these truly 744’s or converted 741/742’s?

    On a similar note, are there any easy ways to tell a difference between a 741 and a 742? The joke I’ve heard is that if it has a brown tail (UPS) then it’s a 741. 🙂

    The B744 cargo plane does have the shorter upper deck, the way you can tell if it’s a 400 and not a 100/200 is the winglets and no windows along the body as they are built to be a dedicated freighter. Saying this, Cathay Pacific are going to be the launch customer for the B744 pax to freighter conversion, so this means it will have a stretched upper deck. CONFUSING

    Hope this helps
    😀

    in reply to: Pictures Pictures Pictures #636444
    skycruiser
    Participant

    here it is.

    in reply to: Pictures Pictures Pictures #636612
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Great pics WD, it’s nice to see some diverse shots. I have just got a pic of a G3 in the same paint as airforce one in LA. I will post it later as I have just got back, I need to go and sleep.

    in reply to: Photo of the day 10th March #638861
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Originally posted by Hand87_5
    It happened to me a couple of times in SFO.
    However there is an optical effect and the 2 planes are not that close.

    Mate, I’m telling you they are close. The runways are not that far apart.;)

    in reply to: Another whats wrong here #639277
    skycruiser
    Participant

    No head rests.

    in reply to: Now CX starting HKG-JFK #639287
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Dartie is correct.

    We hope to start LHR-JFK-LHR. It’s a totally different market.

    in reply to: Whats wrong here #640256
    skycruiser
    Participant

    it’s giving birth to a 757.

    in reply to: Caption Comp #644411
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Another Ryanair cost cutting excercise…No more aircraft parking fees.

    in reply to: To commercial pilots, do you get to choose? #650300
    skycruiser
    Participant

    In Cathay Pacific you usually go on to the aircraft which needs the pilots. I was lucky and got a choice between the B747-400 or the A340.

    skycruiser
    Participant

    The 747 has no performance figures for a 3 engine out situation.i.e drift down. Also, no pilots have any formal training on a 3 engine out situation. So I guess it’s a bit strong to say you would expect a pilot to handle this type of situation.

    in reply to: Your Longest Flight??? #654776
    skycruiser
    Participant

    NON STOP. LAX-HKG 15 hours airbourne. B744.

    in reply to: Couple of pics from my last trip. #657151
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Thanks WD.;)

    in reply to: MAN Pics 1/2/04 #657158
    skycruiser
    Participant

    Air Hong Kong is part of Cathay Pacific.

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 768 total)