dark light

Steve Touchdown

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 812 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: C-130J FLUNKS evaluation.!!! #2607859
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    PII and IPF: I would hardly consider an article from Lockheed Martin’s in-house magazine and an excerpt from Air Mobility Commands daily chest-beating PR as being objective sources to quote here!!

    Besides, my point wasn’t to knock the C-130J so much as point out that, as far as the USAF is concerned, it was pure pork barreling: the C-130 AMP and C-17A are more than capable enough without the J as well. USAF can’t be that short of Hercs: they’ve just donated three to the Iraqi AF.

    Of course the A400M will have “teething problems”; what new platform doesn’t?

    in reply to: C-130J FLUNKS evaluation.!!! #2608202
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    These are the last two paras from a piece in an Atlanta newspaper (for the most part their coverage rehashes the POGO piece):

    Simmons said 37 C-130Js have been delivered to the U.S. military. International customers include the United Kingdom, Australia and Italy, he added. While there are many prospective customers other than the United States, Simmons said, there would not be enough to justify continuing production if the U.S. program is halted.

    The C-130J is a key program at the Marietta plant, which employs 7,800.

    in reply to: C-130J FLUNKS evaluation.!!! #2608205
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Taking a cheap shot by dredging up old news just because there is talk of possibly cutting the J’s production run. 😡

    “Old news”? Christie’s report was published on 6th January and not made public immediately. Forget POGO’s political spin, this is the piece that did the rounds on the news wires (via Bloomberg):

    Lockheed Martin Corp.’s C-130J transport plane, facing cancellation because of budget cuts, continues to have problems that make it unreliable, the Pentagon’s primary weapons testing office said in a new report.

    Glitches in the aircraft, meant to replace older C-130 versions, render it ineffective for some operations, Pentagon Director of Operational Test and Evaluation Thomas Christie said in his annual assessment of top weapons systems, repeating criticisms he made a year earlier. “A program for the correction of deficiencies is being worked,” he wrote.

    “Major issues confronting the C-130J include funding of logistics support and training systems, hardware deficiencies, software and technical order deficiencies, manufacturing quality, subsystem reliability and failure to meet required measures of system effectiveness and resolution of documented deficiencies,” Christie wrote in a report submitted to Congress on Jan. 6.

    A similar assessment was made in July by the Pentagon inspector general. The Air Force and Lockheed, the top U.S. defense contractor, have said the glitches were being fixed.

    The USAF C-130J still has the strong whiff of “pork” about it to me: what they really need are some nice A400Ms 😀

    Maybe an EADS plant knocking-out KC-330s and A400Ms at Kelly/Lackland, TX is the answer to everybody’s prayers 😉

    Cheers

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Mig-21 pics of ALL user countries #2608562
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Are we talking about the same period?
    Israel supplied Mig-21s to the USAF in the late 60s / early 70s.
    I’m not aware of the Indonesian deal, but I’d expect it to be later?

    Definitely within that time period, Dan: it wasn’t really a “deal” so much as related to geo-politics and “regime change”. Maybe one of the Guys here with more local knowledge of the TNI-AU or South-East Asia can confirm, but I think Indonesia stopped ops on the MiG-21F-13 in 1967? Off the top of my head this lead to them going from 1960’s Fishbed ops to being an F-51 user (MAP-supplied in 1970).

    Does anyone know how the Indonesian Fishbed happened to finish-up in the Brussels museum (from 1992, IIRC)? I have more than one source suggesting this passed-on to the US. The one in the TTF at Nellis (Arthur prefers “Petting Zoo”!!) is also reported as being from the same batch. Definitely an area needing some more work….!

    Here’s the TTF one I mentioned above:

    http://www.nellis.af.mil/TTF/MiG-21.JPG

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Mig-21 pics of ALL user countries #2608633
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    The USAF also operated a few 21s, which AFAIK came mostly from Israel as well. (t’was meeting it Vietnam, and eager to study it).

    I’m pretty sure the majority of Fishbeds were actually Indonesian, but it’s not an easy topic to confirm concrete details for! 😉

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Mig-21 pics of ALL user countries #2608667
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    CzAF MiG-21MFN June 2003 Neuburg (Southern Germany) during NATO’s “Clean Hunter” LIVEX

    http://www.btinternet.com/~zola25/5581.jpg

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: RAF Jaguar overwing Sidewinders #2613640
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    From West London Aviation Group’s “South East Air Review” Vol.17, No.7 – July 1978:

    “Jaguar in RAF Service”

    Test Aircraft:

    Used promarily by BAC Warton and A&AEE Boscombe Down’s ‘A’ Squadron.

    XW563 (S.07) Manufacturer’s trials. Updated at West Freugh (Scotland) on weapons trials and Magic overwing missile tests.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    Addition:

    To give a slightly better idea of timescale, XW563 was withdrawn from service and in use with 14 Squadron’s ‘Aircraft Servicing Flight’ at RAF Bruggen, Germany by 1978.

    in reply to: MC-130 writeoff in Iraq – WTF, how stupid can one get #2615997
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Art asked “how stupid can one get” in his original post. I’d suggest it is actually possible, and with tragic circumstances too, unfortunately for those involved:

    US Military Admits It Hit Wrong Target After Bomb Kills 14 Iraqis

    Fourteen Iraqis were reported killed and five injured early yesterday morning after an American war plane obliterated a family house in the north of the country. The military said it was a mistake.

    The American authorities promised a full investigation after admitting that a 500lb bomb had been unleashed on entirely the wrong target, south-east of Mosul.

    Television footage had earlier shown a house in the village of Aitha reduced to rubble, while locals inspected the damage.

    Nearby there were rows of freshly dug graves where local people said the dead were buried. They reported that American military vehicles had surrounded part of the settlement overnight, shortly before the strike in the early hours of the morning. An official US statement said an F-16 jet dropped a satellite-guided bomb on a house that was meant to be searched: “The intended target was another location nearby.”

    American operations are under way to restore security to the area, where the police force has effectively collapsed, ahead of the 30 January elections. Military reinforcements have begun moving to the area and Iraqi security forces are also being beefed up.

    The bombing took place hours before a senior American embassy official in Iraq met leading members of Iraq’s Sunni Arab community to try to persuade them to take part in the elections, which they have threatened to boycott.

    The violence aimed at disrupting the poll continued yesterday. A suicide car bomb tore through a petrol station in Mahaweel, in the “triangle of death” south of Baghdad, killing four people and wounding 19 others who had been queuing at the fuel pump, police said.

    In a separate incident, three Sunni officials from Saddam Hussein’s hometown of Tikrit were abducted on a road south of Baghdad. They had been returning from the holy city of Najaf, where they had held talks with Shia leaders to bridge sectarian divisions over the elections.

    In the past week alone, insurgents have killed almost 100 people in bombings, ambushes and assassinations, mostly targeting fledgling security services – often from the majority Shia population – whom they regard as collaborators.

    Source: The Independent on Sunday (9th January, 2004)

    in reply to: FLANKER users #2616082
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    The Su-27SK manuals are available at http://ftp.virtualflight.ru/documentation and are all in Russian (unfortunately for us non-Russian speakers!)

    If you can’t get them from there I can upload them somewhere else or even send you a CD with them on if they are too big for you to download easily.

    Thanks for the link, Paul.

    Looks like everyone ought to be able to get them from there using their regular browser via anonymous ftp and the speed’s not bad either

    Stick ftp://ftp.virtualflight.ru/documentation into IE for the parent directory and away you go.

    Thanks again

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Update Air Force scenario: Albania #2616720
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    The Albanian MoD have been holding a yard sale for at least two years:

    http://www.mod.gov.al/eng/industria/meico.asp

    Go buy whatever you want from them, even an F-7A for the right price. IIRC you could get an AK-47 for $76 in 2002. Probably even less than that now as they were available for $53 each in Bulgaria during 2003.

    Also worth a look to see how much armament stock is being destroyed month-by-month, updated as recently as November, 2004:

    http://www.mod.gov.al/eng/industria/demilitarizimi.asp

    in reply to: Update Air Force scenario: Albania #2617209
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    That was a long time ago

    No! It wasn’t a long time ago at all!

    Robin Polderman, who wrote the AFM article and provided all of the photos, is a serving KLu technician (F-16 crew chief, IIRC) and a subscriber/contributor to the e-group I run.

    Anyone who wants the facts about the Albanian AF can visit his site for more pictures and info:

    http://www.arrow-aviation.nl/alb_home.html

    http://www.arrow-aviation.nl/alb_types.html

    The intro for the F-7A states:

    The most modern fighter in the FAS-inventory is the F-7A. It is in service in limited numbers, flying from Rinas airbase with the based airwing. The two examples in use will be withdrawn before 2006.

    I’m sure a handful of Albanian pilots were trained on AB.206C Jet Rangers at Viterbo in Italy, yes. I even saw a couple there myself in May 2003.

    Please, carry on deluding yourself as much as you want to…just don’t expect us to believe it too! 😀

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Update Air Force scenario: Albania #2617300
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    USAF T-38As and funding for MiG-21 purchases? Cool: you’ll be able to share the links from the US budget reported to Congress for Foreign Military Financing then, yes? Either from there or the Department of State will suffice, so thanks in advance :rolleyes:

    “A Military Jet MiG-19 Explodes on Air, Pilot Jani Tarifa Killed”

    A military jet exploded in the air today morning (Thursday 16th September, 2004) at Rinas airport causing the death of pilot Jani Tarifa.

    Official sources from Defense Ministry made known that the air accident took place at around 09:00 while the military jet MiG-19 was taking off to realize a military exercise.

    According to preliminary results of the expertise, a breakdown during the take-off caused its downing from the first moment catching fire and exploding along with ammunition aboard. The pilot died and the jet was completely burnt as a result of this grave accident.

    Ministry of Defense and Air Forces Command are closely following the situation, sources make known. Personalities of Armed Forces, of Military Police as well as experts went immediately to the spot by helicopter.

    “MiG-19 Fighter Accident Might Have Occurred Out of Human Error”

    Albanian Minister of Defense Pandeli Majko delivered a report to parliamentary defense commission on the last air accident during which pilot Jani Tarifa lost his life.

    Following the closed-doors meeting of the above commission, its chairman Dashamir Shehi stated that “from the Minister Majko’s report, it resulted that according to the technical procedures MiG-19 fighter was in good order. The accident might have occurred due to human responsibility and error.”

    Nevertheless, Shehi admitted that Albanian army was using outdated military airplanes and affirmed that there is being considered the option of removing MiG-19 fighters from circulation within the space of 2005 year and not in 2009, as it was envisaged.

    Source: Tirana ATA – Government press agency

    in reply to: Cool or Rare Photos #2617985
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Two-seater = AT-3
    Single pit = A-3 (only two of, IIRC)

    http://www.taiwanairpower.org/images/at3/0901.jpg
    http://www.taiwanairpower.org/images/at3/0902.jpg

    Happy ’05

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Romania considers Gripen #2619264
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Hammy,

    just out of interest where did this “story” come from (you mentioned another forum) as I think it’s probably an invention of someone’s imagination! :rolleyes:

    I don’t have any inside information but it’s much too expensive for a lease deal over five years, the link in your first post is about a fire at a theatre in Bucharest and searching that site for Gripen gives no results. It would also completely contradict recently published RoAF plans for the next 5-to-8 years…..

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    p.s. I wouldn’t be at all surprised though if Romania buys Gripen, but not until 2008/10 at the earliest.

    in reply to: Is This happened? Mirage 2000 #2628651
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    1) there were six TLPs in 2000, as there are most years, so it’s not “bi-annual”. Makes me think straightaway how well researched the article must be :rolleyes:

    2) there were two TLPs during 2000 in which Mirage 2000-5Fs took part, and only in one of those did a pair operate as OPFOR components. The vast majority of each TLP is about NATO units flying COMAOS as part of the same package.

    3) in the TLP that the M2K-5s from Dijon took part as OPFOR assets there were no F-16MLUs: only Block 15 Vipers from the KLu and BLu. There were a pair of USAFE F-16C Block 52s, but these are SEAD-equipped. The other “Blue Force” assets were German F-4Fs, Italian Tornado F.3s and AMXs, RAF Tornado GR.1s and Jaguars, plus French Mirage F1CTs and another pair of M2K-5s.

    Last of all, it would be news to me if the air-to-air aspect of each TLP is even very important: the OPFOR assets only take part for the last two weeks, and four days from those ten are lost with non-flying academic days and the last Friday when everyone departs for home. The first two or three days of week four are also usually spent rehearsing C-SAR missions.

    Also, and I’m happy to be corrected on this, no Florennes-based TLP has ever used any calibrated ACMI (except for the air-to-ground “Polygon”) range that I’m aware of. So how are all of the air-to-air engagements asessed to come up with the results the article is suggesting?

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 812 total)