dark light

Steve Touchdown

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 812 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 8 P-3C for $970M? #2675130
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    They weren’t delivered until ’96 after the Brown Ammendment.

    Aziz

    Thanks for reminding me of that, Aziz. I should have remembered as I saw the three of them in the USA back in 1993!

    You’re right: delivery was suspended in 1991 and they finally went in late 1996 and early 1997. I thought they’d been grounded since 1999 (after the accident in October when one was lost during an exercise) so I guess the piece in the Portuguese item must be a typo.

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: 8 P-3C for $970M? #2675523
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    This brings PN P-3C fleet up to 10

    Yep, but the two P-3C Orions that Pakistan already own have been out of service for at least five years, possibly longer.

    This Portuguese news item confirms that OGMA have been contracted to “re-activate” those two at Karachi. It states they’ve been out of use since 1994:

    OGMA subcontratadas para recuperarem P3-C paquistaneses

    As OGMA – Indústria Aeronáutica de Portugal foram subcontratadas pela empresa norte-americana Lockheed Martin para recuperar dois aviões P3-C da Marinha do Paquistão.

    Segundo a edição desta terça-feira do Correio da Manhã, o contrato, assinado pela ex-secretária de Estado Maria do Rosário Ventura, presidente da Empordef, a holding que detém as OGMA, foi celebrado ao abrigo de um acordo entre os EUA e o Paquistão, que incluirá o fornecimento de mais oito aviões P3-C da Marinha dos Estados Unidos.

    A recuperação das aeronaves, que se encontram paradas desde 1994, será feita por técnicos paquistaneses, sob supervisão das OGMA, numa base da Marinha paquistanesa, em Karachi.

    O contrato para inspecção dos P3-C atinge os 5,3 milhões de euros.

    As far as I’m aware, those two are P-3C Update II.75 (i.e. II 3/4) but it’s been mentioned that the 8 ex-USN being proposed are all Update I aircraft. I would guess though, given the price tag of $970M, there must be plenty of upgraded sensors and other equipment being fitted to them. I would hope so anyway at over $100M a pop!! These will be airframes of around 1970 vintage if they are P-3C-I as rumoured.

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: 8 P-3C for $970M? #2675701
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Yes, I think “Fly to buy” means missiles ready for immidiate delivery.

    I was under the impression that Pakistans Cobra fleet was modified to fire Bakther Shikan missile!?

    “Fly to Buy” means there will be 14 used in live tests before they plump for the rest. It has nothing to do with delivery times.

    Pakistan will augment its land forces with these TOW-2A anti-armor guided missiles. Pakistan will use these missiles to increase its military defensive posture and will have no difficulty absorbing these additional missiles into its armed forces. Pakistan’s existing inventory of TOW missiles will soon begin to be affected by its specified shelf life. While TOW missiles can be employed beyond their shelf life, system reliability and safety are eroded. Pakistan continues to expend TOW missiles in both training exercises and combat operations.

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: General Discussion #411289
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    If you’re in a war, and one of your buddies is blown up while checking out a supposedly dead body, you’re going to be very wary the next time you see someone FAKING being dead.

    Just a day or two before this incedent, one of the marines friends was checking out a supposed;y dead body, and it exploded, killing him. Either it was booby trapped, or the guy had been faking it, and was merely wounded, waiting for the marines to get close before blowing himself up. Regardless, knowing this has JUST happend to this marine, can you not expect him to kill someone who is not deaD, BUT IS TRYING TO GIVE THE IMPRESSION THAT THEY ARE DEAD?!?!

    If that happened to me, I’d kill anyoe I saw pretending to be dead. When it comes down to it, he had to make a decision in a fraction of a second. When faced with the current situtation(same situation before resulted in one dead friend), he acted to ensure he an dhis friends did not end up dead. It’s war, war is this ugly. Every time they are faced with the enemy, they have to make this decision to pull the trigger, and it’s never easy. With all the evidence, I think he did the right thing.

    Embedded reporters have done good for the US, they showed the world how we conducted the war. considering that this reporter sent the video to the news and not the governemnt, and somehow Al Jezerra is now broadcasting this marines name and face on the airways…I have to say, that this reporter should be removed from the area. He’s going to get fragged if he isn’t.

    Can anyone explain to me why everybody posting here that’s in favour of shooting unarmed prisoners of war are basing all their arguments on events that they seem to have invented in their own heads? What Pluto, Comet and Minidoh have stated their opinions over isn’t how it happened. Read Damien’s post and you’ll at least have an idea of the timeline of events.

    If this was a 19 year-old grunt from Trailertown, West Virginia that was filmed being executed and broadcast on Al Jazeera you’d be calling the perpetrators “scum”. So get real and face facts. Two wrongs do not make a right.

    in reply to: General Discussion #411396
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    The US Ambassador to Iraq says:

    “No one can be happy about an incident such as that one, but the important point is that the individual in question will be dealt with,” Ambassador John Negroponte told reporters. “The matter is being looked into and whatever measures are necessary under our system of military justice I know will be taken.”

    in reply to: General Discussion #411397
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Conveniently you left out the last paragraph of Amnesty’s statement:

    Insurgents are also reported to have violated rules of international humanitarian law: “Commanders and fighters of armed groups in Falluja also have an obligation to respect fundamental rules of international law. Acts such as booby trapping dead bodies are also war crimes,” Amnesty International said.

    Their October 29th statement specifically mentioned Margaret Hassan, amongst others.

    Iraq: Amnesty International appeals to armed groups for the safety and release of all hostages

    Amnesty International is gravely concerned at the threats made by armed groups in Iraq to kill hostages. The organization condemns the use of hostages as bargaining chips in Iraq and urges armed groups to respect minimum standards of international humanitarian law, justice and humanity in their actions. The taking and killing of hostages is prohibited under principles of international law. Amnesty International calls on armed groups to comply with these principles in all circumstances.

    in reply to: General Discussion #411421
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    And if you realy think this situation is wrong… tell that to the 3 young men from my area who were buried yesterday after getting killed by a suicide bomber. Killed, because they did not shoot first and ask questions later.

    Please correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t those Black Watch troops manning a vehicle checkpoint? As 99.9% of vehicles passing through will have been completely innocent Iraqis going about their daily business, what are you trying to suggest: that they shoot up every vehicle and check for explosives after they’ve killed the occupants?

    It completely escapes any logic that you’re chosing to draw a parallel between two completely unconnected incidents. Unless you’re advocating a descent into tit-for-tat killings on both sides perhaps.

    Steve

    in reply to: General Discussion #411448
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    ‘Twould seem to me that, quite contrary to your assertion, Flood is basing his opinion on an eyewitness report and film/audio footage. If you can’t stomach that, then that’s your problem.

    The US pool reporter, who broke to the world the killing of a wounded, unarmed Iraqi prisoner by a marine, further revealed that more prisoners were shot dead though they did not appear threatening in any way.
    NBC correspondent Kevin Sites was quoted by the Associated Press Wednesday, November 17, as saying that US Marines killed three more unarmed and wounded Iraqi prisoners in a Fallujah mosque Saturday, November 12.

    He added the wounded had been left in the mosque for others to pick up and move to the rear for treatment. No reason was given why that had not happened.
    The shooting in the Fallujah mosque became public Tuesday, November 16, with the airing of the footage taken Saturday by Sites.

    In his report, Sites said the man who was killed didn’t appear to be armed or threatening in any way, with no weapons visible in the mosque.

    Sites said he saw the marine raise his rifle and fire point blank at the head of a man, who was slumped against a wall in a mosque.

    US networks and television channels in other countries have widely shown Sites’ footage, taken Saturday, but halted it in the second before the shot was fired.

    The marine has been suspended from duty and, IMHO will be charged with murder sometime in the future.

    What else do you need to know?

    As for remarks such as “one less of them”, I would suggest that the complete opposite was true. Think about it from an “Arab” persepctive and not a “white western” one like Dis obviously is.

    Steve

    in reply to: Mig-21bis vs F-5E/F #2675995
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    …and here’s a shot I snapped of the F-5E at Kbely that Art mentioned.

    http://www.btinternet.com/~zola25/kbelyf5.jpg

    More on the VPAF F-5s courtesy of Joe Baugher:

    The Republic of Vietnam received 18 F-5Es in 1972, all aircraft
    diverted from deliveries scheduled for Iran. Other F-5Es followed
    later. However, it seems that these F-5Es were relatively little used
    by the South Vietnamese Air Force, since their more advanced
    electronics suite made them more difficult to maintain. Most air
    action still took place with the earlier F-5A/B model.

    During the final North Vietnamese assault on Saigon in 1975, many
    SVNAF Tiger IIs and earlier F-5A/Bs were flown to refuge in Thailand.
    A total of 26 F-5s arrived, 22 Es and four As made it to Thailand.
    They were returned to the USA and stored at MCClellan AFB, pending
    sale to other customers. However, most remained in the USA to form
    the nucleus of agressor training programs,

    87 F-5As and 27 F-5Es were left behind when the South Vietnamese
    government fled in 1975. These were pressed into service with the
    Vietnam People’s Air Force. There are reports that these planes were
    used by Vietnam during its invasion of neighboring Kampuchea in 1978.
    In 1979, nine Tigers were reported to be operating from bases near
    Hanoi as part of a composite squadron also equipped with the MiG-21.
    The Hanoi unit is believed to have been joined by three other
    F-5/MiG-21 regiments. The F-5E/Fs were reportedly more popular with
    their Vietnamese crews than were the Russian-built aircraft that
    provided the primary strength of the Vietnamese air force, which is a
    a rather unique testimonial. They were particularly appreciative of
    the comfortable cockpits and the ease of handling of the F-5.

    There were several attempts by the Vietnamese government to sell its
    captured F-5s to other customers. By now, it seems likely that no
    F-5Es remain flying in Vietnam, the lack of spares probably leading to
    their grounding, despite cannibalization.

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: F-16 strafes school!! #2676557
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    But The War Against Terrorism (pun 2, :dev2: ) definately is a War on Drugs (and that’s number 3 😀 )

    Nice one, Art :p

    When did TW@T become TWoT actually?!? I guess someone must have realised the gaffe.

    To my mind the worst US blue-on-blue was the shooting down of the two Black Hawks over Iraq.

    From 10th November, 2004:

    A-10 from Whiteman drops training munition in field

    WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE — An A-10 fighter jet from the 442nd Fighter Wing here accidentally dropped a small training munition Monday in Kansas.

    No one was injured, and no property damage was reported, an Air Force spokesman said.

    The munition was dropped about nine miles south of Smoky Hill Tower, just outside the Smoky Hill range facility near Salina, Kan., said 1st Lt. Charles E. Gulick, deputy chief of public affairs for the 509th Bomb Wing.

    The accident sparked a grass fire. The aircraft safely returned to WAFB, where it was being inspected to find the cause of the accident.

    The aircraft was on a training mission to the Smoky Hill range.

    The dropped munition, a BDU-33, is a roughly 20-pound training aid that emits a smoke charge to gauge the accuracy of practice bombing missions.

    A board of officers will investigate the incident, according to Lt. Gulick.

    Almost a regular incident in the past few weeks…..

    Steve

    in reply to: Mig-21bis vs F-5E/F #2676756
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    but you don’t hear too much about F-5 crashes 😉

    I think that’s mostly perception: without even cross-checking I can think of the Jordanian F-5E a week or so ago, two Spanish AF F-5s in 2003, a couple of South Korean, a couple of Taiwanese, a Philippines AF one and a US Navy one that have all crashed within the past year or 18 months.

    I guess they tend to be operated under less press scrutiny than the Indian AF MiG-21s do.

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Tornado F.3 Achieves 602:1 Kill Ratio #2678774
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Well that depends on what digit is wrong. Filling in the blanks in the first 8 or 9 digits usually is no problem. Factory, variant, quarter and year of building… 😉

    See what I mean?! Here’s another one right on cue! :p 😀

    in reply to: Tornado F.3 Achieves 602:1 Kill Ratio #2678785
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    You’re not being pedantic there are you Steve ?? 😀

    Ken

    Would you expect any less from a spotter, Ken!? After all, I’m sure you know we get nervous about even one digit in a Mi-24 c/n being wrong! 😀 :diablo:

    Transall:

    I’m pretty sure that kill ratio is incorrect (either a mistake or a typo) which is the reason why I posted the thread to start with (provocative reasons going back to the “Cope India” theread etc.). If I had to place a fiver on it I’d go for it being either 60 or 62. Both still fairly impressive, nevertheless.

    Yes, you’re right: Sea Harriers were flown operationally with AMRAAM but the F.3 hasn’t been yet. It was planned that AIM-120Bs and JTID etc. would be integrated by this year, which they obviously have now on at least a number of the F.3 fleet.

    mpa’s post is very interesting and would be about how I imagined that scenario to pan out. The only thing I’m a little puzzled by is that the article dates from October 2003 and I’m a little in the dark as to how Mirage 2000s would have come up against the F.3/E-3D/JTIDs package more than a year ago. Possibly it was “work in progress” even then.

    Jonesy, I’m sure that, in due course, the FAA’s AMRAAMs will pass to the RAF but, as Transall mentioned, the RAF also have their own stock. Missiles really aren’t my thing at all to be honest, but I’ve just been reading that the RAF have ordered a fairly substantial number of AIM 120C-5 for interim use on Typhoon before Meteor is delivered. Once the C-5 models are delivered (by 2006) all of the 120B variants will be refurbished and upgraded to 120C-5 standard and placed back into service.

    Nuke 1: the strings in the thread refer to two different exercises – one in Canada and one on the ACMI range over the North Sea.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    p.s. mpa, or any of our other helpful French readers here: has there been any news about a French Army requirement for a new Command & Control helicopter platform (LINK 16 equipped etc.) in any of the aviation magazines? I read an interview with the ALAT Commander who briefly mentioned this, but have yet to find any detail whatsoever anywhere else. Thanks in advance.

    in reply to: Tornado F.3 Achieves 602:1 Kill Ratio #2678869
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    “The offensive F-18s were decimated” ??????

    To ‘decimate’ means to kill every tenth one (a great incentive to Roman soldiers – which is where term originates).

    If there were only NINE Swiss F-18’s (and later posts say only FIVE), then to decimate them you would only knock down half an F-18 !! :confused:

    Depends on how pedantic you are I guess. In common use it’s defined thus:

    Decimate = annihilate, eradicate, wipe out, decimate, eliminate, carry off, extinguish.

    USAGE NOTE: Decimate originally referred to the killing of every tenth person, a punishment used in the Roman army for mutinous legions. Today this meaning is commonly extended to include the killing of any large proportion of a group.

    Steve

    in reply to: Tornado F.3 Achieves 602:1 Kill Ratio #2678962
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    As with a lot of these media reports the figures have to be taken with a large pinch of salt: there were only six Swiss Hornets deployed for “NOMAD 2004” and, I think I’m right in saying, that only five ever flew at one time.

    The balance of Hornets were Spanish examples.

    Best regards

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 812 total)