98+32 arrived at Laage on 27th April 2004.
98+33, 98+35 and 98+37 all arrived on 26th April.
I believe at least one more has been delivered since those four.
Best regards
Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News
Many thanks in advance for the forthcoming pics, Frank 🙂
The Mirage IVP is also due to fly at Cognac, Avord, RIAT Fairford and Payerne this season, according to the crew at Orange last weekend.
They also mentioned that a JPO/meeting aerien is planned for 2005 at Mont de Marsan, which should also coincide with the final phase-out of this fantastic jet from service with ERS 01.091 “Gascogne”. 🙁
Catch it while you can!!
Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News
You can keep all your “training manuals” (FHM, Loaded) etc. and the totty that’s contained therein…I much prefer the real thing, personally 😀
At the end of the day you just have to say “to hell with the theory, let’s get on with the practical”! :p
Steve
Great shots, as always, Franck 🙂
See you at Dax and Cognac this weekend if you’re down that way!
Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News
p.s. any Mirage IVP shots? I hear the display was awesome at Caritat. It’s flying again this Sunday at Cognac, I believe.
Not only does the Algerian AF have the most capable strikers in the whole Med with it’s Fencers, it’s upgraded Hinds (i can’t remember the designation, but it’s that butt-ugly South African upgrade with the new wraparound cannon installation) are arguably the most useful attack helos in the area as well. They have absolutely no need for Apaches, and i doubt they even have the desire to burden their logistics with such a non-standard hangar queen like the AH-64.
ATE’s Mi-24 Mk.III SuperHind is the one I believe you mean, Art.
There is no such thing as a “surplus” Apache in the US – the RECAP programme for knackered ones returning from OIF and OEF is running at full-tilt.

Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News
“What can we do to make this forum better?”
Errr….not worry about it too much and get a life away from a PC? 🙂
Steve
Originally posted by Arthur
So a Merc article then? Cool!
Ahhh this Boy has moderator potential written all over him! 😀
Although I think the politically expedient phrase is “outsource contracting”! 😉
MM, that’s not actually a V-1-A Vigilante cockpit but it is from the aircraft the Vigilante was derived from as a proof of concept. It’s an S2R T-65 Turbo Thrush cockpit fitted with a couple of “extras”.
Trust the Dutch here to know their subject! :p
Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News
Not a bad guess whatsoever, MM…well done! 😀
Or was it just that Ayres logo that gave it away!? 😉
Best regards
Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News
I’ve actually been lucky enough to see almost all of the RSAF F-15S as, apart from 4 IIRC, they were all delivered via RAF Lakenheath. I managed to get pretty good pictures of a lot of them too, but they all look pretty anonymous in delivery markings.
This is one from another site to show you an example of what I mean:

Best regards
Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News
Originally posted by Arthur
Couldn’t you bring any better news Steve?
Just like a dodgy old piece of rope, Art, I’m a frayed knot. 🙁
Been busy putting the flesh on the bones of an article that you’ll no doubt see in Scramble # 300 when it hits your doormat.
If you can guess what it is from this subtle clue I’ll be very impressed indeed! 😀
Steve
Originally posted by Flood
No… You for coffee?;)
Far queue 😉
Originally posted by Flood
No… You for coffee?;)
Far queue 😉
There aren’t any “defence cuts”.
We’ve had our budget…last month.
The next defence white paper is in July.
The BS in the Torygraph is all complete and total bollox.
More fool the d1ckheads who believe it.
Yeah, too true.
Wish I lived in Greece or India for sure :rolleyes:
Fvckwits.
F/A-22 Flight Testing “May be Delayed”
Lockheed Martin Corp.’s $71 billion F/A-22 fighter jet program may not be ready for the next phase of its testing, U.S. Air Force Secretary James Roche said Wednesday, adding to storm clouds.
“I think it’s iffy,” he said in reply to a question about whether a scheduled meeting next week of top Pentagon acquisition officials should approve entry into the main stage of operational testing and evaluation.
Roche acknowledged a delay could boost vulnerability to budget cuts, just weeks after the Army killed the Comanche, a multi-billion dollar helicopter development program also plagued by cost overruns and technical glitches.
By law, operational testing of a weapons system must be accomplished before the Pentagon can order full-rate production rather than the current, low-rate initial output.
“I’d rather do it right,” Roche told a defense writers’ forum, referring to results, not preconceived timelines. “And if people want to come and attack it, attack it.”
In the current phase of testing, the aircraft’s “sortie generation rate was not good,” he said, referring to how long it takes to fly again after a test mission.
Significant progress has been made in fixing software instabilities that dogged the so-called Raptor, the Pentagon’s chief weapons tester, Thomas Christie, said in his annual report in January.
But several software headaches remain “as well as numerous deficiencies in functionality that will potentially affect mission performance,” Christie wrote at the time.
The General Accounting Office, a congressional watchdog body, recommended in a report Monday the Pentagon “complete a new business case that justifies the continued need for the F/A-22 and determines the number of F/A-22 aircraft needed” given capabilities, alternatives and spending constraints.
Critics call the F/A-22 a Cold War relic initially designed for air-to-air combat with Soviet MiGs. The program has come under new scrutiny by the White House Office of Management and Budget, which ordered a study of it along with the now-cancelled Comanche, built by Boeing Co. and United Technologies Corp.’s Sikorsky unit.
Roche said problems of the type facing the F/A-22 were normal. He cited the Joint Strike Fighter, another Lockheed tactical fighter program, as “already in trouble” two years into its development.
Although Roche did not elaborate on what he meant by JSF troubles, his spokesman, Lt. Col. William Nichols, discounted them as “normal kinks…because it’s an airplane and a complicated system.”
A spokesman for Lockheed’s F/A-22 program, Greg Caires, said some valves and pumps used in other aircraft had proved to be less robust than expected when subjected to the Raptor’s greater stresses.
On the other hand, “Raptor-specific parts are showing a tremendous reliability,” he said.
Source: Reuters (17th March 2004)
Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News