dark light

Steve Touchdown

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 812 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2691785
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by PAF Fan
    Hi steve
    Here is an FMS report for Pakistan for 2002, it doeas not list type of aircraft spares, but we can safely assume F-16/C-130 or AH-1

    http://www.fas.org/asmp/profiles/655-2002/FMS/Pakistan.pdf

    Interesting news report, thanks!

    Thanks for that, the ball certainly does appear to be rolling again for US supplies. It’s only for $2.5 million of spares but, depending on how they came up with that value (original fiscal cost or current fiscal value) that could pay for a lot of AH-1 parts. I’ll see if I can find a break-down of what it actually was: it should be possible depending on various servers co-operating and being on-line!! :rolleyes:

    Cheers

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2691802
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by PAF Fan
    Steve
    Here is a 1998 report detailing commercial military sales to Pakistan, its lists helicopter spare parts but does not list chopper type, so it may be UH-1 or AH-1

    http://www.fas.org/asmp/profiles/655/dcs/dcsPakistan98.pdf

    PAF Fan

    I think the list you’re referring to is a carry-over from the previous country (probably Oman at a guess) and the entry for Pakistan is just that one in the middle of that page.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2691834
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Thanks, PAF Fan: I can only add that I’ve certainly not seen any documentation or reference on the supply side to confirm any deliveries as yet.

    Whilst doing some research on the original delivery of the AH-1S Cobras in 1984, I came across some FMS data which shows they came close to being delivered 2 or 3 years earlier than they eventually were:

    Pakistan

    On 29th May 1981 the DSAA (Defense Security Assistance Agency) tasked the Amy for diversion impact statements for seven items of equipment which were being considered to be expeditiously delivered to Pakistan.

    The items were 24 UH-1H Helicopters, 18-20 M109 SP Howitzers, 39 M198 Howitzers, 6 AH-1S Helicopters with TOW, 12 VULCANS (SP or towed) and 800-1200 LAW rockets.

    The DA (Department of the Army) position, based on inputs from USASAC (US Army Security Assistance Center) was that, with the exception of the UH-1H helicopters and LAW rockets, diversion would result in significant adverse impact on the combat readiness of the US Amy. Diversion of the UH-1Hs and LAW rockets would have a negative impact on the US Amy but it would not be significant.

    As result of a State/DoD team visit to Pakistan, a list of short and long term military equipment requirements was developed. Army items included M48A5 tanks, M88 tank recovery vehicles, M109A3 SP Howitzers, M198 Towed Howitzers, M113A1 APCs, SP VULCANS, AH-1S Helicopters and ammunition. USASAC developed impact data and validating price and availability information in June 1981.

    In July 1981, the Department of the Army directed preparation of three FMS cases for the Goverment of Pakistan. Advance Congressional notification was submitted to DSAA on 8th July 1981 for 144 M109A2 Howitzers ($112.4 million), 144 M548 Cargo Carriers ($27.7 million) and 46,000 rounds of 155m ammunition ($21.4 million).

    During the period 13-16th July 1981, Colonel C.M. Marshall and LTC R. E. Dyer (USASAC) participated in meetings at the Pentagon between a high level Pakistani Defense delegation and US Defense Department personnel reviewing the future FMS program. A list of military equipment desired by Pakistan was discussed and price and availability (P&A) data provided. The Government of Pakistan (GOP) accepted an FMS case for 1550 I-TOW missiles on 17th August 1981 with a value of $15.1 million.

    In mid-September, the GOP accepted the $3.2 billion economic and military package offered to them by the US Government. Credits were to be extended in October 1982. The dollar value of the Army component of the total package, however, was not known. A follow-up team from Pakistan was scheduled to arrive in early October to work out the details of requirements for FMS cases for the items which had been discussed during the July conference.

    Requirements which totalled approximately $551 million were received from the Government of Pakistan. Items requested included M48A5 tanks, M88A Recovery Vehicles, M113A2 APCs, M198, M109A2 and M11O Howitzers, AH-1S Helicopters, Ribbon Bridges, I-TOW Missiles, communication equipment, and Tank and Howitzer ammunition. Most of the 19 cases required Congressional notification.

    Advance notification was submitted to DSAA on 10th October 1981 for 12 FMS cases with a total dollar value of approxiwtely $462 million. Items included in the Advance Notification were M48A5 tanks, M88A1 recovery vehicles, M109A2, M11OA2 and M198 Howitzers, AH-1S Helicopters, Ribbon Bridges, M901 ITV, I-TOW missiles and ammunition for Tanks and Howitzers.

    A change in US policy due to the Afgbnistan situation permitted the sale of major defense items to the Government of Pakistan for the first time in twenty years. As a result, on 21st Decmber 1981, the Government of Pakistan signed Foreign Military Sales cases totaling $394 million.

    Major iterns included in the sale were: 100 M48A5 Tanks, 35 M88A1 Recovery Vehicles, 75 M113A2 Armored Personnel Carriers, 24 M901 Improved TOW vehicles, 40 M11OA2 SP Howitzers, 75 M198 Towed Howitzers, 64 M109A2 SP Hotitzers, 10 AH-1S Helicopters, 1,000 I-TOW missiles, 900 Night Vision Sights; total of 68,500 of 105mm, 106mm, 155m ammunition.

    Fiscal Year 1982 Deliveries to Pakistan

    Department of the Army directed diversions for Pakistan. All of these were from the US Army, except where indicated:

    60 M109A2 155m self-propelled (SP) Howitzers (2 each from Taiwan); 100 M485A5 Tanks; 2 M88A1 Recovery Vehicles; 2 AN/TAS-4 Night Sights; 10 AN/TVS-5 Night Sights; 1,000 rounds of 105mm APFSDS-T tank ammunition; 5,000 rounds of 105mm high explosive anti-tank – tank (HEAT-T) tank ammunition; 5,000 rounds of 105mm TP-T tank ammunition; 2,500 rounds of 105mm DS-DP-T tank amunition; 20,000 rounds of 105mm HEAT amunition; 20,000 rounds of 155mm of high explosive (HE) ammunition and 1,000 rounds of 155mm rocket assisted projectile (RAP) ammunition (from Greece).

    Best Regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2691887
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by PAF Fan
    Situation on Cobra spares was OK under the 1997 Brown ammendment a large consignment was delivered, and I assume Pakistan has no problem maintianing them now, I beleive all 20 are still operational

    Any sources or evidence to support either of those points, please PAF Fan?

    Thanks in advance

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Underground airfields in Serbia #2691907
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by Srbin
    You’d be very naive to think anything cant be covered up because anything can.

    The naivety is on YOUR part where you apply the standards and values of how your native state is run to nations that have run on a democratic basis for centuries.

    NATO never revealed their full losses therefore you cannot really know what was destroyed.

    Which shows you have no understanding of how NATO operates. NATO is composed of independent nations that have independent military services. If you want to find out what was lost during Kosovo just go and ask the individual services involved. It’s extremely simple. Where do you think the details of the two Apache losses came from that I pasted into my previous post?

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Underground airfields in Serbia #2691951
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    There is one vast difference between the whole ethos of the two “sides” involved in the Balkan conflict, and it sums up precisely WHY any of you who give any credibility to Serbian claims don’t have a clue about the validity of them:

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    Try operating as a democracy for a few years where the military work FOR the tax payer and you’ll then have some idea of where we’re coming from.

    Hey, Art, didn’t you know that the KLu only actually have 35 F-16A/BM Vipers? The crew chiefs closely monitor “Scramble’s” database, and all the spotters message-boards, and they re-paint those 35 with different serial numbers when one hasn’t been reported for a few months. Only J-001 to J-035 exist in reality: any other serials you ever see on logs are completely spurious of course 😀

    Nobody ever tried to cover up the losses of the two Apaches (88-0250 on 26-APR-99 and 88-0225 on 05-MAY-99)…please don’t mistake ignorance for a conspiracy, Guys.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Underground airfields in Serbia #2693200
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by djnik
    I am not collecting information and posting them.I posted pictures and have videos to post as well and those are not taken by him but by other people.I also disagree with his view of the NATO losses but i can also say that they were not also as low as it is publicly know,2 aircraft.Maby few more were shot down.DOnt accuse me for no reason.

    Please, djnik, do not be so naive as to suggest NATO lost more aircraft than is publicly known! Unless you think that all NATO countries operate a huge, elaborate conspiracy where they swear 1,000s of personnel to secrecy and regularly re-paint serial and unit details on aircraft to “replace” the missing ones!

    Have the courage of your convictions and tell us the type and nationality of the missing aircraft please!

    The NATO losses, and even damage, is well documented from a collection of official, press and anecdotal reports.

    One of the funniest things I’ve seen about this supposed “cover up” was a so-called “exposure” (I think it was on Venik’s site) about a KFOR OH-58D Kiowa Warrior crash in Kosovo. The only downfall of this was that the info was readily available, within hours of it happening, straight from official US sources: you just have to know WHO to ask!

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Serbian migs on higways and roads during NATO agression #2693371
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by Arthur
    I’ve always liked those models. But pic 2 looks more like it’s taken on just your everyday airbase taxiway instead of a road dispersal – doesn’t look all that spectaculair. Pic 1 is interesting though.

    Art, doesn’t pic 1 look like a typical Eastern Bloc dispersal track to you though? I can imagine that pic taken from the middle of a HAS site just out of shot! Just thinking of how some of the “tucked-away” HAS sites are in Poland and Czech Republic etc.

    Ciao!

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2693393
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Hi YellowSun

    31 and 32 Squadrons of the Army Aviation operate the AH-1S Cobras from Multan.

    20 were delivered (serial numbers 786-001 to 786-020 with Bell construction numbers 22501 to 22520, respectively) the first ten arriving in 1984. These became operational in March 1985 and the second batch of ten arrived in 1986.

    Not sure about the current mod state, but they are TOW-equipped.

    The other issue that I am completely unsure about is current status and how the fleet has been affected by attrition. I would also imagine the US embargo from 1990 onwards must have severely affected spares. Even the US Army National Guard were struggling to keep Cobras flying in the late 1990s and up until they were retired in 2001.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Eurofighter status? #2693593
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    To be fair this is always a quiet time of year. Things generally start to pick-up again in April and remain busy until the August holidays.

    Anyway, this was fairly recent (23rd January) but apologies if it was already posted here in the forum but I wasn’t around for a couple of weeks:

    Singapore MINDEF discusses technical details of flying Typhoon jet with test pilot

    One of the three fighters in contention to replace Singapore’s aging A4-Skyhawks is the Eurofighter Typhoon. Recently, a test pilot for this state-of-the art jet was in town and he told Channel NewsAsia why he thought the Eurofighter might win the dogfight for the more than US$1 billion contract.

    Craig Penrice has more than 4,500 hours of flying experience in over 40 different types of aircraft.

    Among them the American Boeing F-15 and the Eurofighter Typhoon, which are currently going head-to-head in a dogfight with the French Rafale to replace Singapore’s Skyhawks.

    But Mr Penrice, who is now testing the Typhoon, considers it the better of the two and the jewel in the crown is its cockpit.

    “Things like being able to command the plane through voice control. I can do many tasks by simply talking to the plane. In my helmet, I have tactical information so wherever I’m looking, I don’t have to look at the displays in the cockpit. Wherever I’m looking behind, outside I still have information available to me, this head-up-head-out looking out the plane is vitally important,” he said.

    BAE Systems which builds the Typhoon has been eyeing the Singapore contract for more than 4 years now.

    Buying a new generation fighter jet is not a simple task.

    It’s much more complex than buying a new car for example. The technical details are so sophisticated and complex, BAE Systems specialists get questioned by MINDEF officials on technical issues a few times a day.

    This is why Mr Penrice was in town recently to give the Defence Ministry his perspective as a Typhoon test pilot.

    “Because we know what it is that the service pilot needs out of his airplane. Engineers appreciate that knowledge and they do listen to us. But with all the best intention something doesn’t quite work as envisaged, we report on that and we discuss it and we come up with a plan to improve it,” added Mr Penrice.

    BAE Systems’ Typhoon Export Programme Director, Andy Wilson, said: “The next phase we’ll have to put formal information in front of the authorities here in terms of the specifications and costing data. All of that will be evaluated and assessed by the Singappore government before making their preferred choice.”

    Singaporeans may get a glimpse of the Eurofighter Typhoon next month at Asian Aerospace.

    But the Defence Ministry is not expected to make its final choice till 2005.

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News



    Click to subscribe to Touchdown-News

    in reply to: General Discussion #400424
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by Arthur
    That must be the most bizarre animated-GIF-signature ever used. Brilliant!

    Especially if you note she swallows the bottle with the blunt end first. Pooping will hurt though.

    You found a job for her in the Bananen Bar then Art?!

    😀

    in reply to: Butter on a muffin #1978184
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by Arthur
    That must be the most bizarre animated-GIF-signature ever used. Brilliant!

    Especially if you note she swallows the bottle with the blunt end first. Pooping will hurt though.

    You found a job for her in the Bananen Bar then Art?!

    😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #400435
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by Flood
    Anna might have some shorts like that… I know;) she has the haybales!:D

    Flood.

    Flood, me old cocker, anybody can talk the talk….so post the pics and let’s see if Anna fills hotpant denims as well as Daisy Duke does 😀

    Ciao!

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Counterpoint to Flood's Anna posts #1978187
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by Flood
    Anna might have some shorts like that… I know;) she has the haybales!:D

    Flood.

    Flood, me old cocker, anybody can talk the talk….so post the pics and let’s see if Anna fills hotpant denims as well as Daisy Duke does 😀

    Ciao!

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: General Discussion #400449
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by Arthur
    Well, for all we Europeans know, Emmylou Harris is just one of those 1970s David Bowie-incarnations. Like Ziggy Sawdust 😀

    Exactement, Arthur!

    Youd have thought that the Thin White (Daisy) Duke would be more to a moonshiner’s taste. n’est pas? 😀

    http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/yvonnesm/HazzardCounty/Pictures/daisyhay.jpg

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 812 total)