dark light

Steve Touchdown

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 812 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofight Typhoon and Rafale, whats the hype about???? #2692101
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Re: Re: Eurofight Typhoon and Rafale, whats the hype about????

    Originally posted by PILOTGHT
    for them the irish ares called “celts”, germans “krauts”, spanish “iberian” dutch “batavians”, french “galls” americans “yankies dull”, aussies “convicts” etc etc…

    Oh dear, oh dear…is there actually ANY subject you can come up with where you actually know what you’re talking about? Obviously not judging by your posts so far, Fool.

    The Irish are “Micks” or “Paddies”, the Spanish are “Daygoes”, the Dutch are “Cloggies” (what the f**k is a ‘batavian’?!), the French are “Frogs”, the Americans are “Shermans” and the Aussies are Aussies! My God, you got ONE right…the Germans are “Krauts”…well done :p

    Every single country on this Earth has affectionate nicknames for nations that they have any contact with. Xenophobia my @rse.

    they show all thier respect for foreigners, they ares revisionist about history, and hypocrits Lackeys!

    No, you pr@tt, the lack of respect is towards YOU not your nation or fellow countrymen. You don’t even know where the aeroplane you claim to know so much about is built…how pathetic is that?

    Anyway, haven’t you got some toilets to go and clean, Boy? You must be sniffing some powerful bleach to come up with all the merde that you do.

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Czech ranking #2692112
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    I don’t think I’m regretting not having made it to BP, Arthur! Mind you, isn’t there an Iskra preserved at a hotel somewhere down that way?

    It would be interesting to know exactly which places are being seriously considered by the US. I’ve heard rumours of an F-16 “unit” moving to one of the eastern European countries. Whether this is a squadron or a wing I’m not sure. I imagine Spangdahlem would be the prime candidate for being the donor base….

    So, Poland are obviously serious about attracting the Yankee dollar, as are Bulgaria: Bourgas/Burgas on the Black Sea looks a dead cert to become a permanent USAF facility. Any others on the horizon?

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Czech ranking #2692144
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Some good points well made again, especially regarding Poland.

    I guess it should also be pointed out, in relation to US – Polish ties, that Douglas J. Feith (the US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy) has been in-country this week discussing plans for moving US forces to Polish bases in the future…..

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    p.s. considering the absolutely vital role played by both Ramstein, Frankfurt/Rhein-Main AB and, in sadder circumstance, Landstuhl, the Germans must be appalled to have been excluded from vying for contracts in Iraq.

    in reply to: World F-16 Operators – The Best Versus The Worst #2692368
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by SOC
    Best use of the F-16 in a terrorist role-Israel, “we think there might be a terrorist in the building, so lets bomb it”

    **EDITED BY WM**

    Colour schemes, I’d agree on Venezuela…and the Indonesian ones look not half bad either. Come to think of it the F-16Ns at Miramar had some of the best too.

    Italy must be the top operator: they haven’t creashed any yet…mind you it has only been a couple of weeks since they got ’em 😎

    http://www.btinternet.com/~zola25/Miramar/41nfws.jpg

    http://www.btinternet.com/~zola25/Miramar/42nfws.jpg

    http://www.btinternet.com/~zola25/Miramar/05vf126.jpg

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Russian AF Deployment to Kant AB, Kyrgyzstan #2692591
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Is somebody confusing their Su-27 sub-types, have I missed something (probably!) or is this development significant (from a Flanker point of view not in a geo-political sense):

    Russian air base in Kyrgyzstan to get state-of-the-art fighters

    Excerpt from report by Kyrgyz public educational TV on 10th December, 2003

    The SU-27 SK modernized multi-functional fighter aircraft, which has no parallel in the world, will appear at the Russian air base in Kant [around 20 km from the Kyrgyz capital] soon.

    Pilots of the Lipetsk air force centre were the first to receive the SU-27 SK aircraft. They are now on combat duty at the Russian air base in Kant, Kyrgyzstan.

    Source: BBC Monitoring Central Asia

    Ken? crobato? Arthur!?

    By the way, Arthur, what made you coin the phrase “Flaming Vagina”!? πŸ˜€

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Czech ranking #2692621
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    F-35 in ten years? Yeah, right :rolleyes:

    The planes sitting around gathering dust are at Weelde, AMARC and Woensdrecht and they’re called F-16s. In the case of AMARC some have been sitting there saying “please buy me” for more than ten years. The Block 15 ADFs that they’re trying to palm-off will be 40 years old by the time JSF appears.

    Now the US are giving them away as ‘thank yous’ to countries such as Jordan for letting them base aircraft there during OIF.

    I imagine the Czechs will push for the same deal as the Hungarians and get Block 3 Gripens which won’t even have been built yet if needed for mid-2005.

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Czech ranking #2692671
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Anybody who goes for Gripen now, will in 10 or 15 years find himself in a situation like Portugal with their F-86 in the late 80’s. No updates, no upgrades, no new weapons integrated, excessive spares/rotables costs.

    That has to be the most ill-informed and ridiculous comparison I have ever read.

    Saab/BAEΒ΄s Gripens in pole position for jet purchase

    Minister of Defense Jaroslav Kostelka last week reportedly backed an expert commission recommendation that the Czech government lease Swedish Gripen jets as a temporary measure to protect its skies.

    The daily Pravo reported last Friday that Kostelka had lined up in favor of the Gripen offer, but the Ministry of Defense refused to comment.

    The offer that the Czech army lease 14 new jets Jas-39 Gripens made by the Swedish-British consortium Saab/BAE Systems was already well-placed after it was recommended to the government last Monday by an expert committee convened to weigh up the five jet offers.

    Used U.S.-made F-16s have been offered by Belgium, the Netherlands and the U.S. Canada offered Boeing’s F/A-18s.

    The committee rated the Belgian offer of Lockheed Martin’s F-16s with a mid-life update (MLU) second, followed by the F/A-18s offered by Canada and F-16 MLUs offered by the Netherlands. The F-16 Block 15s offered by the U.S. were placed at the bottom of the list.

    The government is due to decide which offer to select by the end of December. Although Cabinet ministers have already been given details of the jet bids and evaluations of them, Ministry of Defense spokesman Ladislav Sticha said it was unlikely that the Cabinet would decide on the issue this week. “Ministers obviously need some time to read through the material,” he said. “I don’t expect there to be [a jet vote] on the next Cabinet meeting agenda.”

    The recommendation of the expert committee is not binding on the Czech government. All those involved in the offers have kept details and evaluations secret because the process is still continuing.

    Sources close to the deal said the price for a 10-year rental of new Gripens is about 10 percent below the Ministry of Defense’s allocated budget. This included the optional financing of a government-to-government loan with an interest rate of 5 percent. “If the loan is not taken the final price would be even less,” a source said.

    The Czech Ministry of Defense has scheduled gradually rising payments for the jets following expected delivery in mid-2005. Altogether, it plans to spend Kc 25 billion (e695 million) over 10 years on the fighters themselves and their operation. The jets will replace the aged Russian-made MiG-21s.

    Pravo reported last Friday that the cost of the Gripen lease would be Kc 21.675 billion for a 10-year lease. It said it calculated the figure from the material Kostelka submitted to cabinet members last Thursday.

    Chief of the General Staff of the Czech Armed Forces Pavel Stefka drew a distinction between the committee recommendation and final government decision. “A recommendation is one thing, but there is also investment in the future,” Stefka said. “It’s a political question. We are soldiers and we will prepare pilots and equipment to be used,” the Czech Press Agency (CTK) reported last Tuesday.

    Stefka said the government should also take into account which aircraft would eventually be bought for the Czech army after the lease period expires. The manufacturer of the jets selected to guard Czech skies temporarily will be in prime position to eventually sell new jets to the country.

    That is one of the main factors fueling competition to supply the jets now.

    “We must think of what will follow, whether to continue with the Gripen program or whether it will be a different plane,” Stefka was reported by CTK as saying at a meeting of NATO defense ministers in Brussels on Tuesday. “We also have to consider using logistical support.”

    So far, Hungary is the only NATO country that has opted for Gripen jets and could work in conjunction with the Czech army on shared servicing and logistics support for aircraft. Hungary decided to lease 14 of Jas-39s in the beginning of 2003.
    A source close to the Swedish offer said the country has offered three options to the Czech government after the initial lease expires. The first option is to continue with the lease after the initial 10 years, to return the jets to Sweden after the lease period ends or to purchase them.

    The Jas-39 Gripen was developed in the 1990s. The jet’s technical capabilities were previously questioned. Other jet producers, especially Lockheed Martin, argue that Gripens are handicapped by the fact they have no combat record, unlike the well-tested F-16s.

    The Gripen has also only recently started to make planes that meet NATO interoperability requirements. Currently there are only eight such Jas-39s that are NATO interoperable flying for the Swedish Royal Air Force. Sweden is not a NATO member.

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: The end of camouflage? #2692706
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Nice Whale! πŸ˜€

    I was wondering when they’d get round to posting a pic of the finished F-117A….and here it is

    http://www.af.mil/media/photodb/photos/031209-F-0000S-001.jpg

    Apologies to the 56k modem brigade!

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Harrier launch record claimed by HMS Invincible #2692713
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    A good Harrier GR.9 link:

    http://www.harrier.org.uk/technical/Harrier_GR9.htm

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Czech ranking #2692740
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by m.ileduets
    Well, I doubt that “Old Europe” will show that much solidarity with Sweden. Don’t forget: Belgium is official bidder for the F-16s.

    Here’s some more pleasant American mail to the Czechs:

    “The new Gripen offer certainly might be appealing to the Czechs, but there are a lot of open questions about it. For example:

    1) Why do the Czech think they will get a better offer than the one given to Hungary? The Hungarians also were offered Gripens with lowest price, lowest operating costs, completely NATO interoperable, and with a huge offset program. And today they are still negotiating weapons and capabilities… This leads to:
    2) What are the long-term weapon integration costs and who pays for them? Who are they shared with?
    3) What is the legal status of a NATO country taking a leased fighter, the title of which is held by non-alligned Sweden, into an out-of-area operation?
    4) Czech newspapers reported the Czech tender called for an interim solution of a bilateral government-to-government agreement to acquire and operate USED supersonic aircraft under a lease agreement or through a direct purchase from an air-arm. If those Gripens offered are newly built and come directly from the Saab-production at LinkΓΆpping’s line to the Czechs, do these company-aircraft meet the tender specification?
    5) Will they be owned by the Swedish government for the first 5 years? Will they be declared used after maybe a week of flying ?”

    Hmmm there’s certainly food for thought in all of those points, but almost all would apply to anything the Czechs are seriously considering. I was given the impression by the BAE Systems people at Hradec Kralove (they were demoing Gripen and Hawk) that the weapons integration wasn’t a problem because of commonality with systems already in place on the L-159 ALCAS.

    Also, I don’t blame the Hungarians for pushing SAAB/FMV/Swedish Government/Unlce Tom Cobbly & All for a better deal than their initial one for Gripens: they’re getting much better spec aircraft for no extra cost! What can LM offer the Czechs on second-hand Vipers…bigger ashtrays and go-faster stripes?

    I completely agree with Aurel: it would have made perfect sense for Poland, Hungary and both the Czech and Slovak Republics to go for Gripens 2 or 3 years ago. On a visit to Poland in early 2001 some Polish AF officers I met were under the impression the Gripen was already a “done deal”. Gripen had been heavily marketed there and taken part in things like the Polish DOL road exercise. There has also been a lot of Swedish investment in Poland, particularly in the North: have a look to see where your Ikea furniture was made! πŸ˜€

    I’m not saying that I’m pleased Poland went for the Viper: just that, from their point of view, I can see why. I think someone mentioned it was a good deal for the Americans? I remember seeing reports at the time where that was actually questioned due to the amount of offsets involved.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Harrier launch record claimed by HMS Invincible #2692745
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by DOUGHNUT

    Yeah but the at least the yanks would still have 40+ more jets left to launch.

    Blimey that must be a big LHA that I’ve never heard of! What’s it called, the USS Wishful Thinking?

    πŸ˜€

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    p.s. the USMC have crashed another two AV-8B in the past week.

    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Although no fault of the Stryker itself, they haven’t had an auspicious debut in Iraq:

    Fort Lewis Stryker Brigade Suffers First Casualties (Dec 8th)

    BAGHDAD – Three Stryker Brigade soldiers were killed and one was injured Monday when two Stryker vehicles they were riding in rolled into a canal, Army officials said.

    The Stryker Infantry carrier vehicles were traveling on a rural road during combat patrol northeast of Ad Duluiyah, Iraq, when an embankment collapsed, causing the rollover, Lt. Col. William MacDonald said from Tikrit.

    “The accident was not a result of hostile fire,” MacDonald said.

    The names of the soldiers were being withheld pending notification of relatives. The soldiers were from the Fort Lewis, Wash.-based 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, Stryker Brigade Combat team, and part of Task Force Iron Horse.

    The injured soldier was taken to a hospital in Balad, Iraq, MacDonald said. His condition was not available, he said.

    After the accident only the wheels of the flipped, 8-foot-tall vehicles could be seen above the waterline of the canal, The News Tribune of Tacoma, Wash., reported. The newspaper has a reporter embedded with the brigade.

    Both vehicles were pulled from the canal and the accident was under investigation, MacDonald said.

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Rafale currently tested in cold conditions #2692987
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Re: lkij

    Originally posted by PILOTGHT

    typhoon in norway?? get somes links? or shut up!

    Pr1ck…Norway in 1998…when you still thought that Rafale was the wind from your @rse after some spicy cous-cous.

    Over Oslo

    http://www.btinternet.com/~zola25/ef003-L.jpg

    In a Norwegian HAS at Rygge AB

    http://www.btinternet.com/~zola25/ef002-L.jpg

    in reply to: ASW helicopters #2693037
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Nahhh, Hammy

    the Polish W-3 the Navy have are SAR machines. The ASW choppers are Mi-14s.

    Oh and they have four “new” SH-2 Sea Sprite for shipboard ops as well. Cute.

    Cheers

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    [email]Touchdown-News-Subscribe@yahoogroups.com[/email]

    in reply to: ASW helicopters #2693133
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Who operates ASW W-3 choppers!?!

    :confused:

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    [email]Touchdown-News-Subscribe@yahoogroups.com[/email]

    p.s. all but one of the Malaysian Lynxes are delivered: the last one is staying in the UK for Sea Skua trials until next Spring.

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 812 total)