dark light

glitter

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 1,376 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2614512
    glitter
    Participant

    I agree that M2k-5 is a very potent aircraft and better then the fulcrum-b india currently has. but 1 on 3 is still a difficult situation for the m2k-5 IMHO.

    THe MIG would have to fly in three different directions. MEchanical radar have a hard time to track so differents targets. :dev2:

    But as far as i know they do train together. and it is a general opinion that in a-2-a the basic aerodynamics of the 29 are superior.

    pls correct me if wrong

    The airfram of the mirage 2000 is purely a2A :p

    in reply to: The Mirage2000-10mk1 concept #2615401
    glitter
    Participant

    It might not be too old or in the grave just yet, but heck in 2040, It will be the whole mig-21 saga all over again.. With old tech engines, limited space for upgrades, yada yada yada..

    If you are going to spend 9 billion dollars, you might as well factor in the future as well.. why this short term approach..

    If a heavy ToT (I said it again, it’s all according rumors heard in France) India would have a much easy task to adapt another engines.

    But as I said, old tech for M-53, why not, but still kick ass :p

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2615844
    glitter
    Participant

    Glitter,
    IMO the whole discussion is hype.. If we talk in the ground level, then talk about one to one of M2k-5 with 29K…

    I was talking of mirage -5, he wasn’t talking of mig-29K or M2.

    how much will 1 M2k-5 cost versus 2 Mig 29.

    LEt’s see:
    1 very reliable engine vs 4 maintence unfriendly engines
    1 crew vs 2 crews
    1 missile vs 2 missiles.
    Obviously, the mirage is cheaper.

    not to mention if the Mig 29 is an M2, then how many 29’s can the M2k-5 take on?

    Of course, the question would be totally different. 🙂

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2615845
    glitter
    Participant

    To Tell you exactly how an Indian Mig 29 fares against M2k.

    Mig-29 pilots of the IAF don’t fly against -5. French -5 pilots fly against mig-29 in several european countries.

    And i agree with Cinciboy. Your statement does nothing but start a flame. and for heavens sake lets not douse fire with gasoline. 😮 :p

    Stupid answer to a stupid statement.

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2615885
    glitter
    Participant

    Statement is blunt… If you wanna argue then talk about scenario and versions, armament…. Making blunt statement will only result in flaming. 😡

    read my edit.

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2615898
    glitter
    Participant

    :rolleyes: cant say much about ur preferences, can I? Ever met an Indian pilot? 😎

    Indian mig-29 aren’t the most up to date flavors.

    Met a pilot ? What for ?

    Edit: One mirage 2000-5 vs 3 mig 29

    in reply to: The Mirage2000-10mk1 concept #2615919
    glitter
    Participant

    I think this latest greates m2K is a waste of money… All those techs will cost us pretty penny on a old airframe and an even older engine..

    Let’s see.
    Mirage 2000 is old ?
    Mig 29 and Su-27 are as old.
    F-16, F15 even worst.

    So ?

    The correct thing to do is to setup a line in india for rafale with f3 standard..

    But you won’t get the same ToT with the rafale.

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2615927
    glitter
    Participant

    i would any way take 2 M29’s over 1 M2k

    I would take 1 Mirage 2000 vs 3 Indian Mig-29 anyday of the week 🙂

    in reply to: The Mirage2000-10mk1 concept #2616239
    glitter
    Participant

    I can’t be sure what it is you are saying here? I don’t think either of the planes are built in India, although overhaul facilities do exist.

    In France, the rumors said that 36 mirages would be made in France by Dassault, the others in India.
    For what I know about HAL, it sound a bit amazing since they already have a full planning.

    Mirage maintenance is lower, but how much real difference is it going to make when you consider that buying MiG 29s will mean greater commonality with other a/c type (MiG 29k of IN, SU 30MKI, LCA?).

    For few electronics system, how much different mechanical ones ?

    Also, french spares are supposedly more expensive than russian ones. And again what real maintenance bother is it going to be when India produces the a/c, has complete manufacturing base set up?

    “French spares” would be Made in India spares in the case of the mirages 🙂

    This I don’t deny, I’m no expert on dassault, but if you are more knowledgeable, please enlighten us. Obviously you have quoted me out of context – my comment was only in reply to INdian1973’s comment about the French not being very flexible in modifying their mirages (post # 19). So if you think the French/Dassault is v.flexible, please take it up with him. Obviously (from the experience with the SU30MKI) the Russians don’t have too many hangups in customizing a/c.

    So, take a look at Dassault history, from vautour to RAfale.
    then your problem is the difficulty to fit a russian engines into a french airframe.
    COuld you show me example of french or american engines fitted into russian airframes with the help of Mig or sukhoi ?

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2616507
    glitter
    Participant

    You can get 2 used Mig 29’s for the price of one here. What makes more sense?

    Mig 29 without missiles, spare parts or pilots (simulators).
    You could get 10 veritech fighters from Robotech, I would prefer the 60millions mirage 🙂

    in reply to: The Mirage2000-10mk1 concept #2616510
    glitter
    Participant

    Glitter, thats making a virtue of necessity. M53 was a fallback engine to replace the failed, over-ambitious TF104/106 turbofans. Basically a turbofanned Atar 9K50. It should be reliable as its origins date back to WWII Germany 😉

    My link wasn’t the one I had in mind.
    That’s the good one
    http://www.mirage-jet.com/Propulsion/M53/m53.HTM

    Anyway, you’re really the first one to see a link between the M53 and the atar, even with the
    ” In common with the ATAR series that powered the previous Mirage generations the M53 has a single shaft powering both the fan and high pressure compressor stages.” in the link above.

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2616536
    glitter
    Participant

    Are they completely out of their minds? $62.5 mil for a second hand Mirage 2000-5? Who would pay such insane price?

    You don’t have ONLY mirage for that price but missiles, equipment and so on.

    in reply to: The Mirage2000-10mk1 concept #2616543
    glitter
    Participant

    M53
    Its hard to believe just how low tech M53 is. The AL-21F-3 turbojet achieved 14:1 compression ratios….

    http://www.mirage-jet.com/Propulsion/propulsion.htm

    But it must be said that the M53 is perfect for what is has been designed for, high altitude, high speed.

    And I have to add that I don’t know any pilot who would choose another engine with +10% thrust but not as reliable as this one.

    in reply to: The Mirage2000-10mk1 concept #2616730
    glitter
    Participant

    Technically too it would not be possible to fit an RD 33/43 or AL 31 on the Mirage 2000?

    The RD-33 wouldn’t translate into a real upgrade for that cost.
    As you said, I don’t think a aL 31 coult fit into that arframe.

    Screw it – just go with the MiG29 M/m2 – cheaper, better in A2A, and can be further worked on for better A2G role! 😡

    India is said to built the mirage/Mig would Dassault/Mig won the 126 aircraft deal.
    I’m not sure it’s easer to know whcih is cheaper or not.
    One think is sure, the mirage maintenance is still lower and with a country with a very high hour/year fly, it means something.

    And yeah, the Russians have no problems in customizing the a/c as per customer needs.

    Your lack of knwoledge about Dassault is obvious 😀

    in reply to: IAF -news and discussion june 2005 #2616734
    glitter
    Participant

    For what I heard about that deal, Indian would built most of these mirages.
    So I think that the price is under 50millions$ but cannot be know exactly.

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 1,376 total)