dark light

glitter

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 1,376 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: european stealth UCAVs. Your opinions: #2627873
    glitter
    Participant

    make sense because France won’t be buying the majority of this product unlike the JSF. And this is more fair? :rolleyes:

    Look at the transfer of technology that these country will get.
    Abuot the production, the neuron is a demonstrator 🙂

    in reply to: european stealth UCAVs. Your opinions: #2628095
    glitter
    Participant

    SAAB (Sweden) which is entrusted with the general design, the equipped fuselage, the avionics, the fuel system and part of the flight testing;
    EADS (Spain) will bring its experience for the wings, the ground station, and the data link integration;

    Strange. I would have said that SAAB is clearly ahead of EADS spain about datalink.

    That means that all other partners must share the other 50%.

    Doesn’t this give France majority control over the project?

    Doesn’t sound like France and Dassault have learned much since they left the Eurofighter program.

    IIRC, France give more than 50% of the funding.
    At least, that project is way more fair than the JSF.

    in reply to: Rafale vs. Su-30MKI #2630323
    glitter
    Participant

    I hope we could get a bit more infos in few days.

    glitter
    Participant

    But you still have two missiles, MICA EM ( is that how it’s called ? the ARH one ) and MICA IR.

    BOth are the same mission.

    glitter
    Participant

    What people most fear is that the M2000C doesn´t have Mica capability.

    Well, these mirage can fire MICA but we don’t know if the datalink between the radar and the missile guidance system is available. 🙁
    Perhaps Brazil will focus on Mica IR.

    in reply to: Why the Rafale? #2636386
    glitter
    Participant

    Between that crappy clip + the movie SKY FIGHTERS, it seems that the french army is into marketing berserk rage.

    in reply to: Brazil to buy 12 used Mirage 2000-5 for US$50 million #2639562
    glitter
    Participant

    RDM = radar de merde = ****ty radar :d

    glitter
    Participant

    the M2k has the “potential” to be the most lethal weapon in the area, but the prices are allucinating high :eek:, say for example upgrading them to -5 or -9

    Upgrading a “classic” -C to -5 is a real heavy operation.
    The upgrade from a F-16 A/B to MLU isn’t cheap too.

    in reply to: FIRST F-35 FINAL ASSEMBLY UNDER WAY #2646567
    glitter
    Participant

    Staring from when exactly, Glitter?

    It’s almost June and so far only two new Rafales have been seen at Merignac in the whole of 2005: Rafale C 102 and and Rafale B 307. I assume there is a 306 also…but nobody has seen it yet. As far as I’m aware neither have flown yet…but I don’t have confirmation of that so far.

    Since the end of 2004 but as you said, something is strange and the released of new rafales too low.
    You can easily heard rumors of electronics troubles on french forums.

    in reply to: FIRST F-35 FINAL ASSEMBLY UNDER WAY #2647855
    glitter
    Participant

    1,5

    in reply to: Singapore say No to Eurofighter!!! #2608800
    glitter
    Participant

    Without the USA the Taliban will still rule Afghanistan.

    In 96-97, the french government of Mr Juppé wanted to help cmdt MAssous against the Taliban, but the american gov refused that. :dev2:

    We showed ’em pretty damn good in WWII. The thing is, if we want it bad enough we’ll win. Period. And everybody knows it. Stings doesn’t it?

    Well, if Germany was your neighbourg, it wouldn’t have been so obvious I think.

    in reply to: Why the Rafale? #2609294
    glitter
    Participant

    1 German tranche Eurofighter =50 millions (68 aircraft, contract volume € 3,4 billion) Even if I repeat myself, could you please provide any information what is included in the French F3 order ?

    Since I’m totally drunk, I will provide you an answer tomorrow.
    Moderators, feel free to delete this post 😀

    in reply to: Why the Rafale? #2609389
    glitter
    Participant

    Again! Sources please not just an opinion backed up by hot air and prejudice. If you won’t provide hard evidence to back up your claims I suggest you keep your opinions to yourself.

    I really hate this kind of tactics.
    dismissing abvious facts.

    http://www.latribune.fr/Dossiers/defense.nsf/DocsWeb/IDC1256F950039F30AC1256F2800110646?OpenDocument
    la commande des 59 avions de combat Rafale F-3 pour un montant de plus de 3 milliards d’euros. Une enveloppe de 3,114 milliards d’euros est prévue en crédits de paiement dans le budget du ministère de la Défense.
    1 Rafale F3 = 52 millions.

    Ouch, I can’t find the very recent UK deal only, but I find that
    http://www.eurofighter.starstreak.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=988

    “The negotiations are finished,” a spokesman for Eurofighter told the paper, which said the agreement to build 236 Eurofighter aircraft, worth around €14 billion ($18.5 billion), will be signed by the end of the year
    :p

    Yes, but still more expansive then the Rafale production. At the end of it’s assembling process, all Typhoon parts combined have seen more of europe then I did during the last ten years.

    Right.
    It’s an easy and efficient way to lowered the cost of the Typhoon, but it comes with a very high political cost.

    The British paid more for more jets ? What is strange about that ? Besides this, I think development costs are here mixed in, too.

    THey paid EACH planes more than the cost of a Rafale.
    I think that the link I posted doesn’t include that since the industrial like to split these cost in PR.

    Additionally, the advantage of the larger order will come into play mostly with tranche 3. Here I would suspect a definately lower price for the Typhoon.

    The RAfale F3 is already lower than the Typhoon.
    How can you make it go down by pouring more money into that program ?

    And even if it would be 1,2 million more expansive compared to the Rafale, it would well be worth it.
    It offers the larger radar

    YEs, the mecanical one.

    the higher cruising speed and the better supersonic performance. It is the better pure fighter.

    I fear it’s a bit more complicated.

    The advantages of the Rafale are somehow not that critical to the needs of my country. Larger external fuel tanks, a higher theoretical maximum (a2g !) loadout, larger ferry range (due to 2 more wetpoints). And of course the naval variant.

    Better range and better playload are nothing ?
    I’m happy for you

    in reply to: Why the Rafale? #2609397
    glitter
    Participant

    What is poor about it. It is a quick estimate based on:

    In mid-1997, the Cour des Comptes has stated that the Rafale programme will cost a total of 224 billion French Francs.

    We are talking of devellopment cost.
    Same player shoot again.

    in reply to: Why the Rafale? #2609459
    glitter
    Participant

    No, it isn’t. Simply because there are 4 national production lines, 4 national logistic centers, 4 national sh!t of everything.

    4 assembly lines. Not 4 production lines.

    To compare the production costs, we should take the fly away prices. Could you provide the numbers of the C/B-model Rafales ? How many exactly at which price ?
    I think the British order comes pretty close in numbers. Got someone the prices for the British order at hand ? 😀

    Few months ago, UK spend more money on a limited typhoon tranche2 than France with fully develloped Rafale F3 even when the french gov bought less planes.

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 1,376 total)