dark light

glitter

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 1,376 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Search for French ACF / ACX studies … later Rafale ! #2678382
    glitter
    Participant

    I really doubt that Dassault has a new card left on the sleeve.

    RAfale + russian project (PAK-FA ??) + UCAV, I think it’s enough;

    in reply to: Why do the French need a nuclear armed standoff missile? #2678690
    glitter
    Participant

    They is a little debate in France about the ASMP.

    For mirage 2000N in East of France, they are totally useless since they were use to threaten Moscow.

    On super Etendard (my god, a nuclear weapon under the wing of a super etendard :rolleyes: ) or RAfale they can be more useful.

    the problem is that the AdA don’t want to loose his nuclear capabiltiies so that only the Navy would ahve these (ASMP + M45).

    That’s obvious for me that France could lower the budget of several branches of the Force de frappe.

    in reply to: ATF design — looking for better picture #2679088
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by aerospacetech
    last one of Rockwell’s ATF:

    Looks like pretty obsolete design according to me.

    in reply to: CASA CN-235 Nurtanio #2685937
    glitter
    Participant

    http://www.zap16.com/images/EC-001.jpg

    in reply to: any news about Greece's plans for the Eurofighter? #2685941
    glitter
    Participant

    I think we will have to wait after the Olympic games to know a bit more.

    BUT IIRC, Greece will have new elections since that date, so perhaps the governement will change …..

    in reply to: Can middle weight fighters compete well in today's market? #2686934
    glitter
    Participant

    Re: Can middle weight fighters compete well in today’s market?

    Originally posted by WACHENR0DER
    middle weight fighters (in the export market) as in the Rafale, Eurofighter, and F-18E/F Super Hornet.

    it would appear that many customers prefer light weights (such as the M2K and Gripen) or heavy weights (like the F-15 and Flankers)..

    Light weights for countries with a small budget (South Africa for example).
    whereas for last deals with a high budget, you can’t say anything about the technical advantages of medium or high weights since it was really more politcal than technical.

    Originally posted by WACHENR0DER

    while the F-15 and the Sukhoi by far, have much greater carrying capabilities and range, while having alot of room for upgrades (and with the latter, has a cheaper unit cost than the 3 middle weights)..

    It’s a question of proportion I think.
    When I look at the difference between Grippen-Rafale and Rafale-F-15, you cannot honestly said that the Rafale does not seem to be that far (of the grippen) but the F-15 is much greater

    And keep in mind that F-15 or Flanker are old fighters now, newers aircrafts are mor expensive, look at the F-22.

    But I would like to point that you’re wrong about the F-15 which is not as cheap as you think. and of course, not a word about the maintenance.

    in reply to: What will happend with HAFs Mirage F1? #2686940
    glitter
    Participant

    *I heard that Greece would sold them to an european eastern country IIRC.

    in reply to: AESA Radars Number of Modules #2690482
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by flex297
    What is approx. the unit price of each element or the whole radar?

    The amsar is late because European AF want pretty cheap MMIC.
    Look at SK who may not buy the AESA with their F-15K.

    And don’t forget the Japanese F-2, 800 modules I think.

    in reply to: some photos of the Florennes TLP #2694104
    glitter
    Participant

    Re: some photos of the Florennes TLP

    Originally posted by Franck66
    http://pegase.foxalpha.com/photop/0004/001046.jpg

    With the heavy tanks and from that point of view, the mirage 2000 wings seem to be pretty weak for such huge tanks 😮

    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by SD-10
    They should first concentrate on Aviation before going to Space.

    and why ?

    in reply to: Rafale Order Cut by French Government #2650006
    glitter
    Participant

    PILOTGHT

    As I said, we cannot know if it’s just a slip in the agenda or even if it’s “just a slip”, what could prevent the french gov to said “After all, these 11 rafales won’t change much” and cancel them ?

    in reply to: Rafale Order Cut by French Government #2650022
    glitter
    Participant

    I’m waiting a bit more information about it.

    For now, it looks like a “shift” and not a cut of the final numbers even if it can happen still.

    in reply to: Mica vs AMRAAM #2650386
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by F-18 Hamburger
    what airplanes have been cleared for Mica?

    i’m assuming most if not all of the Mirage 2000 variants, Rafale, and possibly the later Mirage F1s?

    Supposedly Gripen is also able to carry it.

    for now, only Mirage 2000 -5 and newer and the rafale.

    I heard that mirages F-1 could be upgrade with a new radar to use the MICA (the rumor said that the morrocan AF is interested by it).

    Grippen ? Doubtful.

    in reply to: Mica vs AMRAAM #2650850
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by Indian1973
    there was mention of a M2000 shooting down a F16D – where was it and Mica used ?

    If you want to speak of the “greek shot” IIRC it was a magic or another short a2a missile.

    in reply to: Mirage 2000-9 vs F-16 block 52, lets end it for all #2650858
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by gui
    anyway a 2000-9 is just a 2000-5 Mk2 +

    WRONG, otherwise, why did Dassault give two different names ?
    The -5 = a2a
    the -9 = more a2g

    Originally posted by gui

    about avionics, in fact the 2000-5 and its variants took some things from the development of the Rafale.

    Mostly wrong.
    The -9 and mk2 has some cool updates extrapolated from the rafale but cannot use exactly the same.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 1,376 total)