dark light

glitter

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,376 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2290106
    glitter
    Participant

    how you know this fact that they dont need new fighters?.
    perhaps some thing to do with erratic french politics of blindly following qatar.

    And new fighters for what exactly ? The “threat” now is Iran, the quality of their fleet is already well above what Iranian AF have now AND of course, in case of war, USA and France would protect the country, so, no need for fighters.

    You’re right to say that Qatar has some real influence over french politics, but as far as I know, we have a base and a strategic relation with UAE, not Qatar.

    in reply to: Russian vs European aviation industry #2290220
    glitter
    Participant

    The Mig-29 vs Rafale and Eurofighter? The Mig-29 was in service in 1983, the Rafale in 2000, the Eurofighter in 2003.
    Again, about 2 decades seperate their service introduction. About the same time as the difference between the first flight of the F-86 Sabre and the F-14 Tomcat.
    And if you want to go down the route of saying the end of the Cold War slowed down development of the Eurocanards, the same is true, and even more strongly, with the Soviet/Russian replacements, which should have come on line roughly the same time as the Eurocanards.

    I hate to say it, but if anything, your “examples” destroy your own argument, and certainly do not favour Europe.

    Try again.

    Rafale and Typhoon vs Mig-35.
    India, a user of Mig-29 put the european planes ahead.

    What exactly so special about European radars ?

    The technological improvement didn’t stop for 15 years here.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2290228
    glitter
    Participant

    By the way, why are potential Rafale clients holding their breath until the Indian negotiations are concluded? I am just interested to know.

    Why ? Because should India buy Rafale, even with their own production plant, many sub-system should have a much better production rate, so, better quality and certainly better price.

    in reply to: Russian vs European aviation industry #2290428
    glitter
    Participant

    Lol, French fighters are fairly good but I donยดt think they would defeat typhoons, Flankers or even Grippens in AA (not saying they canยดt but i just don’t see any advantage for Rafale), and their performance in AG would have to wait for the Damocles substitute to be close to advertised.

    Thanks for the laugh ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2290440
    glitter
    Participant

    UAE Halts Talks to Buy French Rafale Fighter Jets -Report

    Bad, baaad translation ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    Strange that the minister was told that UAE intends to reduce its military spending on French equipment to 10% from a previous level of 70%. What happened? I know that UAE were not happy with negotiations re: Rafale but this sounds like them saying that they no longer want to deal with France.

    Bring on the speculation about them buying something else…

    The minister said that during a previous period of time, 70% of military spending went to french companies while today, on the same period of time, only 10% went to french companies.
    The fact is that the big issue with selling the Rafale is that UAE don’t need new planes, F-16E or Mirage 2000-9 are still good for their job BUT french official tried to shove it in Emiratis throats, which become an issue to see OTHER french products like Nexter VBCI.

    Anyway, with the ongoing discussion with India, it’s not a surprise that any potential customer of Rafale is holding his breath, waiting for the final decision.
    If you wan to be more cynic, another issue is that UAE asked many many things to France, got 99% of them, so, obviously they must think of another “gift”. :diablo:

    in reply to: Denmark set to run fighter selection in 2013/4? #2290448
    glitter
    Participant

    Several claims have been made; one of them was that initially the Rafale fighters were operating in “safe” areas where no SAM threats had been identified. Libya is after all a big country.

    It would be very interesting to hear a refutation of those claims!

    Right, the first missions over Benghazi to bomb the Lybian army was a “safe” area.
    Sound extremely plausible.

    claims made by…?

    Baghdad Bob me think.

    Well, seriously, EVERYONE (Rafale, typhoon or F-22 pilots) try to fly into “safe” areas, that’s war, not a video game where you just have to wait 5 sec for respawn.

    in reply to: Mirage 4000 vs early Su-27 #2291001
    glitter
    Participant

    It would obviously have had an avionics suite similar to what the Mirage 2000 finally got.

    Except a much more powerful radar. ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Denmark set to run fighter selection in 2013/4? #2291398
    glitter
    Participant

    If everybody shows up to the deployment with F-35s, then there is a single set of logistics, maintenance, operations planning and all aircrew are trained to equivalent standards. Even a handful of F-35s will bring more to the fight than a full squadron of Gripens.

    And if everybody shows up with only Typhoon or only Gripen or even only Rafale (let’s be open minded), guess what, single set of logistics too.
    Just to day, I hope you understand that this argument only have sense if you’re american.

    Many posters on Modern Military Aircraft forum, like those on other hobby forums, lack depth of understanding of what it takes to conduct air operations in support of a campaign.

    Sampaix ? Is that you ?

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2291448
    glitter
    Participant

    I suppose its ironic then that today France is spearheading the multinational nEUROn program while the UK has opted to independently develop the Taranis. ๐Ÿ™‚

    You must remind the criticism from Dassault at that time. They said that companies must be used as an efficient piece of the industrial puzzle.
    SAAB was welcome as a member bringing real value.

    About the Rafale:
    http://www.air-cosmos.com/defense/rafale-un-standard-f3-r-pour-2018.html

    Standard F3-R in 2018:
    – Integration of the Meteor
    – Integration of the pod PDL NG
    – New IFF capacities
    – Newer version of link 16
    – Optimisation of A2G functons
    – Light upgrade of Spectra.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2298118
    glitter
    Participant

    F-16E radar is 2003 standard. Almost 10 years older than Rafale. If Rafale is merely matching its not impressive.

    But the difference of cost is noticeable.
    It was clear since the very beginning that the european cooperation related to AESA was to lower the price of modules.

    see Irbis example. It is 400 Plus now compared to couple of years back.

    Abour radar, you know, talking about what is possible to do with the maximum setting isn’t as interesting as talking about what your opponent will do with your EM emission.

    in reply to: Which direction Taiwan? #2299689
    glitter
    Participant

    They won’t work with Taiwan because 20~25% of their exports go to China, and are biggest foreign investors in China. Korea in particular is running a massive trade surplus against China(Yes, there are non-OPEC countries running a trade surplus against China, the other being Taiwan), so they can’t help Taiwan directly, only indirectly by training Taiwanese cadets on their naval ships and in the army tactics.

    Well, as SlowMan said, I can hardly see more country than Russia or India.
    What about some Indianized Rafale in 10 years ? :diablo:

    in reply to: Current MiG-29 operators who are intending to retire soon #2304432
    glitter
    Participant

    Whats so speciall about Algeria and French jetfighters? Dont the countries fairly good/normal political relations to each other nowadays?

    Nope.
    As a french person, I feel sorry to see that the relationship between France and Algeria isn’t better, but it’s a reality, french products aren’t even considered by algerian governement.

    I am more interested in why they feel the need to beef up their rather powerful AF further? Who is the mighty neighbour they need do keep at bay? Morocco? Niger?

    They have some money and the will to be the main regional power, so a nice AF is a must have.

    in reply to: Current MiG-29 operators who are intending to retire soon #2304891
    glitter
    Participant

    Slovakia and F-16 won’t happen. If they ever get new aircraft, it would be leased Gripens which they can operate together with Czechs and Hungarians.

    That would make sense for Slovakia, and certainly for SAAB too.
    On the other hand, when are those slovak Mig-29 supposed to be phased out ?

    Algeria is already considering Rafale or Gripen to replace their MiG-29.. when it happens who knows but the intention is there
    http://www.tacticalreport.com/view_news/Algeria:_Defence_Ministry_Rafale_and_Mirage/2861

    In the current situation, I cannot imagine the Algerian government interested into french planes, unless if Qatar or UAE push them to accept a deal.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2306881
    glitter
    Participant

    For all the fans of the outrageous “pink” Rafale… you may not get a real-life manga Rafale, but this sure is close enough. ๐Ÿ˜€

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_KtuaVv4VEU/UFfuzYkiogI/AAAAAAAACjU/TbLbIIH0b5o/s1600/rafale-decore-pour-les-70-ans-du-normandie-niemen.jpg

    I hope that nobody on Strategypage will be afraid of that red star on a Rafale ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2312315
    glitter
    Participant

    Detail lies in hidden costs

    Lol as my friend at work like to tell me : “You mad? :D”

    I’m quite disappointed by that article.
    – “Dassault has under-estimated the value of the Rafale” isn’t back up by any element. I expected a bit more on that, I must say.
    – “ToT is difficult and expensive” isn’t a specificity of the Rafale.
    – If India is too demanding with some aspects of the deal, buying a Typhoon or f-18 won’t make a difference.

    Then, I recognize the author, the same guy who wrote
    http://www.ipcs.org/pdf_file/issue/SR126-NSP-IndiaandtheRafale.pdf

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,376 total)