dark light

arquebus

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 268 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Did the Luftwaffe make the right choice with the F-104? #2229579
    arquebus
    Participant

    They used the F-104 as an interceptor, the role for which it was designed and in which it excelled.

    The F-104 excelled at hi-altitude hi-speed engagements, thats it, a very narrow band of capability when you consider low level intruders that the F-104 would be completely incapable of matching turn rate with at low altitude

    The Super Tiger is an unknown quantity since it never entered service while the Mirage probably would have been a better striker but a worse interceptor and the F-8 would not have had the upgrade potential of the others.

    I would not call the capability of the Super Tiger unknown, when the J79 was fitted it put the Super Tiger into an entirely new class and was the first jet to go Mach 2, so in a sense it went into the unknown before everything else. The airframe would have had to be completely redesigned as it was not strong enough to bear the weight of the J79 in operational service. Both the Germans and Japanese were considering the Super Tiger, bribery of officials can be the only logical explanation for why Super Tiger lost to the F-104 as it out excelled the F-104 in every way.

    in reply to: Deadly Beast US Military A-10 ground attack aircraft #2229977
    arquebus
    Participant

    Certainly a very capable aircraft. I don’t know how they can even contemplate taking these out of service.

    I think they can quite easily contemplate removing it from service considering the A-10 was designed to take out hard targets in the target rich environment of a soviet cold war invasion of western europe which most people estimated the outcome would have been decided on the first week. A flying gatling gun is no longer considered to be an anti-tank platform and cant compete agaisnt attack helicopters for hitting isolated targets on todays battlefield.

    in reply to: Deadly Beast US Military A-10 ground attack aircraft #2230358
    arquebus
    Participant

    BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR BRRRRRRRRRR BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234817[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Did the Luftwaffe make the right choice with the F-104? #2230976
    arquebus
    Participant

    Just a reminder, the F-5 and Mirage III were never competitors for the F-104. The F-104 entered service for european countries in 1960, the Mirage III first rolled off the production line in 1960 and the F-5 didnt enter service till 1962.

    The only real competitors for the F-104 was the Tiger, F-8 and the CF-105 (the Arrow being the obvious correct choice). These jets were superior to the F-4 so it would have been embarrassing for the US to sell a better fighter than their current top-of-the-line fighter. As we all know the F-4 proved to be quite a dud at dogfighting in Vietnam.

    Some other potential candidates would have been the F-102, F-105 and F-106. I also want to mention that I dont buy into the idea that the F-104 was an untouchable low level attack fighter. That myth was dispelled when mig-15s made easy meat out of F-105s in Vietnam.

    in reply to: General Discussion #282332
    arquebus
    Participant

    People that claim cannabis oil cures cancer, or any number of other illnesses. They go so far as to claim there is proof of this, yet the proof either turns out to be sensationalist news reporting or endless Youtube videos of new age quackery. Even worse, this sort of belief tends to go off the deep end into the conspiracy realm whereby one is an idiot if you didn’t realise that cannabis cures every disease

    The effect that marijuana has that is beneficial to diseases like cancer is that it induces the desire to eat a lot. This effect is referred to as the “munchies”. Ive experienced this first hand because I grew up in southern California in the 70s and 80s where smoking pot was as common as drinking beer. Nowadays my generation is raising teenagers and we can legally force our children to get ripped on legal drugs such as Xanax and Adderall.

    I don’t see why a forum as small and as niche as this one requires anything above minimal moderation. Was this forum much busier in the past? Seems like there is fewer than twenty unique users on here on any given day. :confused:

    OH WOW, now there’s a question. Yes this forum used to be quite hopping with hundreds of people embroiled in daily drama. I dont know when this place died out, but it was at its peak around 2006 or 2007 (Ive been on AFM since 2000 under the names Brad and mixtec). The only names I recognize from those old times are DazDaMan, frankvw and Moggy C. I recall back then that the keymags staff got sick of breaking up fights here so they held elections for users to vote for moderators from among the users. The users here ended up with two guys, frankvw and Flood. Flood was literally the worst troll here, the perfect example of the lunatic running the asylum. And then there was this guy named snapper….oh, I should let others describe him.
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?20114-Best-Worst-of-The-Three-Stooges-you-chose!&highlight=snapper+figure

    in reply to: General Discussion #282391
    arquebus
    Participant

    in reply to: General Discussion #282396
    arquebus
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234731[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Civil Aviation Videos Thread #486253
    arquebus
    Participant

    some pretty hairy crosswind airliner takeoff and landings
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P9OAng32F0

    in reply to: Low Level…… #2232211
    arquebus
    Participant

    oh oh, someone broke some windows

    in reply to: How would you re-build the Argentinian military aviation? #2234661
    arquebus
    Participant

    you mean they’re more capable than necessary?

    yes, thats pretty much what I mean

    and I say that as someone who grew up in the cold war when the intensity of a soviet invasion of western european forces was more than tactical armchair musings. eurocanards fill no large role in todays combat environment

    in reply to: How would you re-build the Argentinian military aviation? #2234672
    arquebus
    Participant

    The problem is that you also have to make from scratch the machinery and tooling used in the production line. Only that more than triples the cost per aircraft.

    Best regards,

    somehow I doubt all the countries whove built aircraft under license have paid triple the cost

    in reply to: How would you re-build the Argentinian military aviation? #2234681
    arquebus
    Participant

    Much too late to build Mirage 2000 under licence. It went out of production ten years ago. The production line no longer exists. It’d have to be recreated from scratch.

    correct me if Im wrong, the whole idea of building under license is creating the production line from scratch, not using the existing production line

    this is something that should be done more as prices for fighters in the last 20 years have never reflected market value but ability to pay. eurocanards are cold war fighters with electronic systems capabilities are no longer relevant for todays military budgets

    in reply to: How would you re-build the Argentinian military aviation? #2234706
    arquebus
    Participant

    anyhow what is particularly in it for France, Dassault or SNECMA?

    money?

    in reply to: How would you re-build the Argentinian military aviation? #2234727
    arquebus
    Participant

    I think building Mirage 2000s under license is the best option for Argentina. Eurocanards are overpriced and overrated. I dont think Chinese or Russian equipment is good for extreme long range conditions of that area.

    The only other option I can think of is to have India build Jaguars. The engines on the Jaguar have been uprated with with Garret turbofans so I think it now has 1 to 1 thrust to weight ratio. I dont know if the UK has veto power on the Jaguar design though. And I think India’a close ties with the UK would prevent this. So really the Mirage 2000 is the only viable option IMO.

    in reply to: Low Level…… #2234741
    arquebus
    Participant

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 268 total)