I find it odd that a paint scheme option should be for what seems to be a partially painted aircraft.
Some sort of explanaion should be given in my view.
It wasn’t “partially painted” but one of a number of oddities and variations at the time, there were also Hurricane’s painted in the same manner with one upper wing roundel. Bear in mind also that there may have been more than one aircraft coded WZ-T.
Regarding the new Sea Vixen kit, I’m pleased that Airfix have started to reintroduce its RAF roundel decals complete and not produce them with a separate red dot, which were a nightmare to accurately position them on a model, and was one reason why I gave up model making.
Ironically that started in the early 90s, I think initially by Revell and then Airfix, simple because so many modellers preferred the spots separate, and because it was easier over such a large print run to get more sheets that were usable. Even today many of the specialist decal companies prefer to split things like roundels down as an extra insurance measure against slight shifts in registration.
Centering them is not that difficult, a bit of setting solution to float it in place, then pad it down with a cotton bud.
Putting too much on the modeller’s market has taken most of the initiative away.
I agree whole heartedly.
Regards
John
Thing is John, much the same thing was said back in the early 1980s when yourself and Tim Perry pretty much kick started the whole after market industry. There were even dark mutterings with some IPMS members who baulked at using “metal” bits on their kits and whether it was defiling the “Plastic” part of the IPMS! In fact go back further and people were saying exactly the same thing about plastic kits, that they took the skill out of modelling!
As one well-known spokesman for Hornby often says these days, nobody is seriously attempting to replicate the quality of those kits.
That’s odd, because the Sea Vixen certainly aspires to that kind of quality as do the new Spitfire XII and Seafire XVII – they are certainly a step up from kits like the 1/48 Hawk, Spitfire Vc, Spitfire IX, Canberras and 1/72 Nimrod in terms of quality, detail and fit.
Whom exactly is this “well-known spokesman”?
the quality of the Sea Vixen mouldings is easily on a par with the Lightnings
Must have improved significantly then. I’ll reserve judgement until I see a boxed production kit!
I was under the impression from your assessment that you already had one. I guess pics on the internet don’t tell the full story.
I’ve got both kits on front of me, the quality of the Sea Vixen mouldings is easily on a par with the Lightnings, in fact the panels lines are actually finer, the wheel wells have more detail, the cockpit is moulded rather than decals, large Cartograf-printed decal sheet… the model in AMW looks the equal of the Lightnings.
I’m praying that the coming Sea Vixen and Valiant will be a return to the Lightnings form!
The reaction at Telford would suggest yes, the Sea Vixen in particular has the same detail touches and feel of the Lightnings. Ditto the new Spitfires/Seafires, which are light years ahead of the Spitfire Vc/IX kits from the Humbrol era.
The photos were taken on the same day and the Nimrods were parked next to each other. The colours look totally different but I am assuming both are Hemp??????
Yes the are the same – Hemp started out as BS4800.10B.21 but has since been reclassified as BS381C 389 Camouflage Beige. Its a colour with plenty of “moods”, appearing to be grey depending on the lighting conditions.
Dave mentioned the saga of the “Flying “Sh**house”, according to those who serviced her, she was supposed to be in “Hemp” but due to an error in the paint specification the upper surface colour came out in dark brown shade. The base C/O was not impressed and ordered that she be repainted PDQ. As Dave says she acquired some nicknames (in both guises) which can be found on the Model Alliance sheet MA-72 176.
The devil is in the details as they say. Having been a member of the UK Wildlife Trusts for over a decade, they have reported all manner of changes happening on a micro level around the world that are of concern – its the domino effect of small things happening that affect the larger things which a lot of critics don’t seem to be able to grasp – the kind of evidence they are looking for seems more rooted in a Roland Emmerich film than reality.
The devil is in the details as they say. Having been a member of the UK Wildlife Trusts for over a decade, they have reported all manner of changes happening on a micro level around the world that are of concern – its the domino effect of small things happening that affect the larger things which a lot of critics don’t seem to be able to grasp – the kind of evidence they are looking for seems more rooted in a Roland Emmerich film than reality.
Talking of Carmichael’s Sea Fury…
Anyone know of any good photos of WJ232 during her spell in the Korean War on HMS Ocean? Do the books mentioned have any clear pics? I need to determine the details of the markings for an artwork project I’m doing.
Thanks in advance!
Jonathan
Hi Philip,
Fantastic, thanks. I’m guessing that the block under the bird is probably a green square with “CXX” in gold – I came across a photo in the 1993 RAF Yearbook of XV235 in the hemp/light aircraft grey low-viz scheme that features that very block on the fin.
Thanks again.