u mean the MS-21?? …. i don know whats the previous, how much was that?
u mean the MS-21?? …. i don know whats the previous, how much was that?
Yo will fully agree to that, else Boeing wud not have gone the Airbus way to create an ugly aircraft.
BTW got any idea as to how many Boeing inted to built and the status of the same, and how many 600T’s are there?
But the Russian Volga Denper’s An-124 wud be busy freighting the GE-90’s for the B777 and now the Trent series for the B7E7
Yo will fully agree to that, else Boeing wud not have gone the Airbus way to create an ugly aircraft.
BTW got any idea as to how many Boeing inted to built and the status of the same, and how many 600T’s are there?
But the Russian Volga Denper’s An-124 wud be busy freighting the GE-90’s for the B777 and now the Trent series for the B7E7
K done, Peter. 🙂
K done, Peter. 🙂
Also some specs for the MS-21 a/c and the engine that is likely to power it , though its only one model is gonna get into the ‘regional’ category into which all other regional jets come in.
Also some specs for the MS-21 a/c and the engine that is likely to power it , though its only one model is gonna get into the ‘regional’ category into which all other regional jets come in.
I wont say ugly, coz its k …. but if they choose this as a successor to the B-2, then it would be fine, as their wud be lots of space to carry ammo, which the B-2 can only ream of. So have its potential as a military weapon, though highly unlikely.
but as Tenthije (can u plzzz tell me as how to address u, can u give me a short name that u like?) it had far fewer windows and a in any emergency the reaching the doors can play havoc with that large number of passengers, so in that sense it was not a good idea.
Also the Tupolev had their own of this Blend Wing Body , from which I guess the Boeing got inspired. I am not getting that drawing of the Tupolev’s model, when i get i’ll post it.
I wont say ugly, coz its k …. but if they choose this as a successor to the B-2, then it would be fine, as their wud be lots of space to carry ammo, which the B-2 can only ream of. So have its potential as a military weapon, though highly unlikely.
but as Tenthije (can u plzzz tell me as how to address u, can u give me a short name that u like?) it had far fewer windows and a in any emergency the reaching the doors can play havoc with that large number of passengers, so in that sense it was not a good idea.
Also the Tupolev had their own of this Blend Wing Body , from which I guess the Boeing got inspired. I am not getting that drawing of the Tupolev’s model, when i get i’ll post it.
here is the earlier model of the RRJ and the newer one , I guess the model with ‘remade nose’ is the new model.
here is the earlier model of the RRJ and the newer one , I guess the model with ‘remade nose’ is the new model.
and a fig showing the the body of the 7E7 that comes from their respective areas.
and also the modified 747 thats to carry the 7E7 fuselage section to its integration at US. I thought that Airbus A-300-600T was the ugliest, but Boeing hav not yet lost its competitiveness.
the 600T looks like a huge tumor on iys head, where as this one seems like the tumour for the whole body, and probably the McDonald culture caught up with Boeing and have not got a fatter uglier belly.
and a fig showing the the body of the 7E7 that comes from their respective areas.
and also the modified 747 thats to carry the 7E7 fuselage section to its integration at US. I thought that Airbus A-300-600T was the ugliest, but Boeing hav not yet lost its competitiveness.
the 600T looks like a huge tumor on iys head, where as this one seems like the tumour for the whole body, and probably the McDonald culture caught up with Boeing and have not got a fatter uglier belly.
nice pictures man, does the boeing site have any good pic of the same?
and here some more from me of the 7E7 and the refreshingly beautiful interior.