dark light

Blackcat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,140 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Inside one of the many pathetic rusty bucket??? #2068358
    Blackcat
    Participant

    Hey Serv,

    its better not to get into this Canada China trade war …… edison have got very bitter feeling with China ….and obviously very enny for what China is now and how she is progressing ……..now would we be able to see some new buckets which had some mishap in the noth atlantic …. after 2-3 years of super-duper restoration and stat-of-the-art goodies ..as it has to be said when saying things abt the developed members

    in reply to: US could shoot down EU satellites #2621841
    Blackcat
    Participant

    That U.S. ascertainment doesn’t really suprise me. The U.S. is very clear about its orbital superiority plans.
    Again I’m disgusted to see how the EU is poisoning the transatlantic climate for the sake of promoting an “European identity”. That is not the way to go.

    Have you got an IDENTITY and FREEDOM of your own ????

    If not, then u r very much valid in ur thoughts abt Europe not to have its identity and freedom and the world at large!

    What can you do with Galileo that you can’t already do now with NavStar or Glonass?

    U get what u need at ur time and place at the quality that u look forward, and not what someone else want u to have at their choice of time and quality which comes in not at ur price, but theirs!

    No way the U.S. will allow some Euro-Hindu-Sino-GPS to be used against them.

    and that seems like the words coming out from an American Christian Missionary, who already have been very much active in India’s NE since the 40’s and have converted almost 90% of the population and among their ‘charity’ include the separatists insurgets who get the backing from the church which is as clear as broad day-light amoung the Indian Intelligence, but pity that pseudo secular bosses won’t dare to say that in open for fear of the getting branded …real pity.

    and it wasnt long back that the ACM’s pie did some hunting along the Indian Missile Testing Range at Balassore before the locals fried him which again got some special treatments from the world media, not to mention the barking from the bottom of the world, which was along the lines of what they did during the N-test and after then with their survey of IN’s new baby for the Unkil.

    @ PLA & India…: China sure has potential, but India will remain a noshow.

    and thats what I want Indian’s to realise and move forward.

    (And if some people find my ascertainment racist – I don’t give a hoot!)

    Now thats the very best that one can expect, in the wildest wet dreams from any cultureless, ignorant, arrogant and equally retarded $astards …. but then I wont be exaggerating abt that terms coz it would be great to know if freelanders actually have or keep a list of their mom n dads …

    Castor,

    Do you honestly think that a country like Czech republic, who’ve been occupied by the Soviet Union for more than 50 years, can consider the US as a friendly country – when you try to threaten them? (Note: I’m referring to when Mr Craig Stapleton, former US ambassador in Prague, threatened the Czechs that choosing Gripen instead of F-16 would damage the relationship between US and Czech republic for a long time.)

    to be pretty honest , u should not compare any former soviet state to that of the frelanders market, coz what u get are two different products ….. the Czech even though as said to have been oppressed, an alien concept like freedom and not to mention the long list still have got many to their credit whcih they did not have in their past 50 yeasrs! … say that as surprise or miracle, but thats true …. and I don ned to give u a list ……. but y dont we move to another place nearly the other end of the world???……..

    Oh Yeah …. u guys got it…….. JAPAN ……without any doubt the Mightiest Asian Country and an Industrial Gaint in the19th century who rose to power w/o any European ‘enlightment’ … like what the British scripted history book of all the commonwealth nations teaches. BUT the Japanese were EVIL, or say say the Noble guys & empire, and what made them evil??…. their alinging with the Nazi Germany and Italy …. and ofcourse they were ‘invading’ Asian nations for their evil designs. WOW what a theory from Noble minds …. and for any sensible person these all will surely look like a big JOKE ……. now Japan was indeed invading other lands for sure for meeting their Industrial needs where as the Noble empire was colonising for the same. But the Japanese NEVER INVADED ANY SOVEREIGN NATION for their expansion!!! …..what they invaded was the British, American and other European COLONIES!

    But then the poor innocent Japanese citizens (whose pre-freedom history , their lifestyle, society etc etc are seldom seen or head on any world stage today), who were dying for ‘fredom’ got their FREEDOM when it came in the form of mashroom clouds at Hiroshima and Nagasaaki and have been a free world since then till this very moment. But it would not have been so easy if the Japanese ruler had wanted to wipe out his entire population , repeat, CIVIL POPULATION, NOT MILITARY .. he would have continued till the last, but then he was not so noble like the Noble men who dropped freeBOOM for the Japanese citizens, he was an evil nut. So thats should have been expected. But then, if the God be kind enough the freelanders will some day get to have a feel of mashroom freedom from maybe their own guys. Some day.

    But what is Japan now???…… a Nation that produced mighty ships, aircrafts, submarines, a huge industrial base etc etc and an undisputed mighty Asian Nation which rose to its status with the sweat of the hard working Japanese who would have been a role model for all the Asian nations in tune with the God given geography – the land of the Rising sun ……

    But now, I don see them using a Japanses Designed aircraft for their civil liners, let alone any Japaneese Aviation company or Desin Buaera. I dont see their military using any japanese military products, let alone any true R&D or Military establishment. I don see Japan having any independent industry, I don see them having any independ policy, let alone any freedom of though for an Independent policy. I don see them having any non-degraded military ships, let alone any decent indegenious Military shipbuilding capacity. I don see them having any decent defence from missiles, let alone any indegenious defence system, whose only master is truly Japanese, and not some one from the other continent. … the list goes on… and thats what Japan is now , a big ‘Market’ …. or what earlier used to be called as ‘colony’ …. a big politically and militarily controlled Market. Now I don wanna mention the induced craze for sex in Japan, and thats also what freelanders bought in as that was an integral part as that was what their granma’s, granpa’s, mom & dad has been showcasing them. … so now almost all teenage Japanese girl is just a Japaneese Doll who looks only good in B’day suit and with obvious other stuffs.

    Blackcat
    Participant

    Ken,

    this link is not working, have u changed ur ste??…. if yes can u plz give me the new link?
    http://www.duffeyk.fsnet.co.uk/russian_carriers.html

    .

    in reply to: US could shoot down EU satellites #2621853
    Blackcat
    Participant

    a comparison of the GPS and GLONASS is in this link u guys can check out …. its from what Kya Bidu posted …

    http://www.oso.chalmers.se/~geo/gg_comp.html

    it also says 24 each satellites …..of the 30 satellites which will be the final one for the GPS, 6 will be spare or reserves …. a bit old …

    here is another short article abt the GPS system
    ————————————————–

    THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS)

    Satellite navigation systems provide a highly accurate means of determining the precise position of an object on or over the earth’s surface. Accurate satellite data allows a cruise missile to receive regular mid-course updates which counteract the drift inherent in traditional gyroscope-based inertial navigation systems (‘INS’). Packaged with even a simple INS, satellite navigation systems give a cruise missile accuracies of between 10 and 100 metres.

    Two satellite navigation systems are currently being established. The United States has recently completed its Global Positioning System (‘GPS’); its Russian equivalent is the Global Navigation Satellite System (‘GLONASS’).

    The US GPS consists of twenty four NAVSTAR satellites in polar orbit (three of which are back-ups), a network of ground stations which constantly check and maintain the accuracy of the satellite data, and the necessary receiver units which translate the satellite data into precise positional information. The system can be used to obtain both horizontal (latitude and longitude) and vertical (altitude) fixes. Signals from three satellites are needed to obtain horizontal fixes, the signal from a fourth to obtain the vertical fix and give a complete three-dimensional position. If the receiver picks up data from more than four satellites, the accuracy of the fix is increased.

    Although the GPS was originally intended to be used for purely military applications, the shooting down of an off-course Korean commercial airliner by Soviet fighters in 1983 led President Reagan to direct that it be made available for commercial users.

    The commercial Course/Acquisition (‘C/A’) Code is openly available, and was intended to give accuracies of between 30 and 100 metres. However, when it became clear that in practice the C/A code was accurate to nearer 10 metres, the US Department of Defense introduced Selective Availability (‘S/A’), which deliberately reduces the accuracy of the signal (‘degrades’ it) to some 100 metres in the horizontal plane and 140 metres in the vertical. It is claimed that S/A fixes will be accurate 95% of the time, yet in circumstances when an optimal configuration of four or five satellites is not ‘visible’ to the receiver it is possible that this accuracy may fall to around 300 metres.

    GPS accuracies are expressed in terms of dRAMS, one dRAM being a 2.5% probability of inaccuracy. The accuracy of the S/A code is defined as 100 metres with a 2 dRAMS confidence. This means that 95% of fixes will be accurate to within 100 metres of the actual position. It does not, however, follow that a missile guided by S/A code would achieve a Circular Area Probable (‘CEP’) of 100 metres: dRAM has a 95% confidence level and CEP a 50% confidence level, therefore the two figures cannot be interchanged. As the 2 dRAM S/A GPS fix equates to a CEP four tenths as large, the CEP of a cruise missile utilising the S/A code would be approximately 40 metres (i.e. 50% of missiles fired would arrive within 40 metres of the target).

    Although the full implementation of the Russian GLONASS has slowed since the break up of the Soviet Union, it should offer a very similar service to its US counterpart. Like the GPS, GLONASS consists of twenty four satellites which transmit both military and civilian signals of comparable accuracies to the GPS P and C/A codes. Whilst the two systems operate slightly differently, integrated receivers accessing signals from both networks will reportedly give accuracies of some 20 metres, effectively circumventing US efforts to degrade the S/A code.

    DIFFERENTIAL GPS

    The data transmitted by GPS can, however, be significantly upgraded by a process known as Differential GPS (‘DGPS’). This relies on a second receiver, known as the reference receiver, located in a precisely-determined spot, broadcasting a correction signal on a different frequency to the other GPS receiver. This can be effective even if the two receivers are more than 1,000 km apart, and makes it possible for users of the military P-code to attain fixes accurate to between 75 cm and 5 metres. S/A code can be improved by a factor of ten, to between 2 and 5 metres.

    Although this technology is only just beginning to emerge, it is already utilised for surveying, maritime safety and civilian aviation applications. The integration of DGPS into cruise missile guidance systems is certainly feasible, although this would require that reference updates be transmitted through a data link to the missile in flight via a mother plane or ground station. However, given that DGPS reference stations are being constructed along the coast of the United States and their signals broadcast by way of other satellites, it appears likely that its accessibility will grow.

    Integrated into a cruise missile, these navigation systems will enable developing nations to perform a technological leap-frog. Israel already claims that its GPS-equipped Delilah RPV can reportedly attain accuracies of less than 100 metres, and India is working to adapt GPS for both its cruise and ballistic missile programmes. Pakistan, China and Iran are also reported to be seeking means of integrating GPS into RPVs and missiles. Although the degrading of codes from GPS and GLONASS should, in theory, prevent developing nations from developing cruise missiles with accuracies better than 100 metres, this is likely to be circumvented by further advances in technology. Likewise, whilst GPS signals can be jammed using electronic countermeasures, this may not prove practical in all circumstances. However, the GPS S/A code can, if necessary, be switched off, as was the case during operation Desert Storm and during the US invasion of Haiti.

    ————————————

    .

    in reply to: Caracas (AFP) Venezuela purchases 40 Attack Helicopters #2621860
    Blackcat
    Participant

    And most probably u guys will get to know from the above article that the Ka-50 was operating in conjunction with not only the Mi-24 which was already known but also the Ka-31AEW or as is mentioned in that article — a new version of the Ka-30 naval anti-ship helicopter equipped with an advanced air-to-surface radar system “Oka.” — which will in no time rubbish any speculation and surprise as to the ability of the Ka-50 (which even then was in development) to have engaged surface targets effectively.

    The weapons and systems employed by the Ka-50s were —– 80mm S-80 rockets, Vikhir-M ATGM, Shkval sighting, tracking & guidance system …..

    I’d like the members over here to post any article which mention the “Drum” effect of the Ka-50s that was found in Chechnya …

    in reply to: Caracas (AFP) Venezuela purchases 40 Attack Helicopters #2621868
    Blackcat
    Participant

    This ia a 2001 article abt the Ka-50s operation in Chechnya and also in brief. So all thoase who don’t have any idea as to the Ka-50/52s can try to get some thing abt the Kamovs and stop BS regarding the Ka-50.

    ——————————————————————-

    Kamov Ka-50 in Chechnya

    Philadelphia, Mar. 14, 2001 — Following the initial deployment to Chechnya last year, the Russian Army’s Ka-50 “Black Shark” attack helicopters for the first time have fired live ammo against an actual enemy on January 6, 2001 in Chechnya.

    A small force of coaxial Kamov Ka-50 attack helicopters were reported to be based at Grozny’s “Northern” airport when they were deployed to the province. The actual location of their base is classified and is being constantly changed. When a small group of Russian journalists were allowed to visit the secret helicopter base, they were flown in blindfolded. The helicopter pilots they interviewed hid their faces behind the sun visors of their flight helmets.

    Kamov Ka-50 attack helicopters operate in conjunction with Mi-24 “Krokodil” assault helicopters and a new version of the Ka-30 naval anti-ship helicopter equipped with an advanced air-to-surface radar system “Oka.” The Ka-50 helicopters are armed primarily with up to 80 S-8 80-mm unguided rockets and 12 “Vikhr-M” (AT-12) laser-guided air-to-surface anti-tank missiles (ATGMs). The “Black Sharks” are also equipped with the advanced “Shkval” Automatic Sighting System ensuring target detection and identification, precise guidance of the “Vikhr-M” ATGMs and use of the 30-mm 2A42 cannon, identical to the one carried by the BMP-2 armored personnel carrier.

    The Ka-50 can carry up to 2,000 kg of weapons on four moving underwing pylons in addition to the internal high-speed cannon. The supersonic “Vikhr-M” missile in conjunction with the “Shkval” sighting system allows the Ka-50 to engage camouflaged reinforced targets from up to 10 km away: well outside the reach of any type of air-to-surface missile available to the Chechen rebels.

    The “Vikhr-M” missile can penetrate of up to 900 mm of explosive reactive armor from the maximum launch distance of 10 km, which makes it the most deadly anti-tank missile in service around the world. This remarkable missile can also engage aircraft flying at speeds of up to 800 km/h. Even though the Ka-50 is capable of firing dedicated air-to-air missiles, the air-to-air capability of the “Vikhr-M” allows to maximize the efficiency of the available maximum 2,000-kg weapons load.

    On January 9, 2001, a Ka-50 and an Mi-24 engaged a well-camouflaged rebel ammo storage facility not far from the town of Komsomolskoye. Despite the very limited room for maneuvering due to nearby mountains, the Ka-50 was able to dive on the target at a very steep angle and fire a salvo of S-8 rockets, completely destroying the ammunition dump. The Mi-24 destroyed a nearby observation tower also with unguided rockets.

    A flight of Ka-50s and support helicopters detected a camouflaged rebel base to the south of Centoroy on February 6. The base was built around two reinforced buildings and appeared to be heavily defended. A decision was made engage the target with guided missiles. Two “Vikhr-M” laser-guided missiles were launched from a distance of three kilometers, completely destroying the two reinforced structures. The entire base was demolished by the attacking helicopters in a single pass.

    On February 14 a helicopter strike group consisting of several Ka-50s and support helicopters was on a “free hunt” mission in the area of Duba-Yurt and Khatuni. In low-visibility conditions the helicopters engaged and completely destroyed eight targets using guided and unguided munitions, as well as the automatic sighting system.

    The Ka-50 “Black Shark” earned a good reputation not only among its pilots, but also among the Mi-24 pilots, who were amazed by the Ka-50’s agility. The “Shkval” sighting system permits the Ka-50 to execute intensive air-defense-evasion maneuvers following the launch of missiles, without losing the target lock. Frequently, pilots of the escorting Mi-24 assault helicopters lost the sight of the Ka-50s and were searching for them in the wrong part of the sky.

    So far too few Ka-50s are deployed in Chechnya to have any significant impact on the situation in the province. While the combat role of the Ka-50 in Chechnya is still very low, the psychological impact of these fast black helicopters on the morale of the remaining Chechen rebels is immense. The rebels got used to the heavily armed and armored Mi-24s, with their undisputed strengths but also significant drawbacks. The Ka-50 provides the Russian army aviation with an ability to engage heavily-defended enemy positions from a safe distance and with high precision.

    Successful deployment of Ka-50s in Chechnya is a significant victory for the Kamov Design Bureau. The “Black Shark” now has at least one undisputed advantage over its archrival for the domestic attack helicopter market – the Mil Mi-28. Achievements of the Ka-50 in Chechnya will also improve Kamov’s chances on the international arena as well. Already, South Korea expressed interest in purchasing a number of Ka-50s for its armed forces. Other potential customers include China and India. Greece and Sweden are considering purchasing the Ka-50 as well.
    ————————————————–

    in reply to: A-50 SRDLO #2621872
    Blackcat
    Participant

    lol…..u got some real experience with A-50s 🙂 … unlike the speculated IAF experience, which I for sure doubt was an Isreali backed one and so does the Indegenious AWACS project which got cold stored ever since the Isreali” came ….

    in reply to: US could shoot down EU satellites #2622439
    Blackcat
    Participant

    and that in plain words mean that its high time that Europe developed a counter so as to shoot down the GPS constellation, and that only will gaurantee against a strike from the US on Galileo …. so its time europe though some better means

    in reply to: Caracas (AFP) Venezuela purchases 40 Attack Helicopters #2622454
    Blackcat
    Participant

    But the Mi-24 pilots had very high opinion abt the Ka-50s ….and what was that drum about??…. was it also coz of that exhaust getting in the way of the rotor?

    in reply to: A-50 SRDLO #2622456
    Blackcat
    Participant

    just only that much info ….. so the a/c that u went inside was not any operating one? .. oh i though u had sneaked into one of the operational one for which u got that ride in UAZ ..lol

    in reply to: Indian Submarine Competition #2068438
    Blackcat
    Participant

    Now a reason for the delay in the building of Amurs can also be attributed to this development (or speculation , as u can say) as PJ-10 was intended as a weapon platform for tri-services which included its launch platform from Sea, Air and land, but a point which was not noted was the sub-surface launch of the same. And the platform which could host India’s first sub-sea launched Brahmos PJ-10 could be ….. this Amur (?), which still is in its development stage.

    This will quickly fill in a void with its firepower before the ATV come in – but Bars will be entering earlier than Amur, if its on its way – Russia had earlier too made very customised and even a fully new platform (An-32) for Indian Defence services, so this won’t be a surprise on that front. But surely could be one, if the displayed one is actually the one intended, as that seldom got any real attention.

    This could also mean a sub-sea launch of the PJ-10 would be there before Bars set sail from the top of the world and Amur before it get into service.

    here are some more pic, a close up of the above and the silo hatches of the Akulas in the opened position. The second one will give u a good measure of its size.

    in reply to: Europe's Strategic Heavylift #2622484
    Blackcat
    Participant

    Blackcat,
    Arthur is right! What your proposing is an entirely different aircraft that can’t accomplish any mission, plus I’m sure it would be ridiculously expensive! Its like marrying a fat ugly girl, and saying if she had the body of Pam Anderson, and the face of Charleze Theron, she would be hot!! just curious, how old are you? if you don;t mind me asking
    TTP

    I think he is the one who have derailed what i said earlier ….. done that i said few other changes, but it coud be based on that and that basing could be either the fuselage dimensions or any other, but in this case the fuselage dimensions (diameter, height, width) wud be the one …… It definetely would be a new a/c for sure, i don argue that. But thats impossible is rediculous …… u see the Boeing transport their GE-90 engines withAn-124 and they are not very happy abt it. Ie a single piece huge and heavy stuff, whose transportation cant be any easier than having an a/c who have front and rear ramp like the An-124. Now the A380 configuration is not anywhere near that and is mostly 3 deck config, which means if some one says that they are gonna buy A350 with only GE-90, either Airbuis can call in An-124 or like the A-300-600Ts built some with a config like the An-124.

    But transporting GE-90 whose diameter is almost bigger than B737s fuselage with pushing in through side doors, then dragging it to rear or like wise, and a few of these getting transporting would be great stuff to see …

    So there also arise a civilian need, coupled with any future need (as per the European Task Force or what ever u say) for that far-off deployment w/o the american heavies, Europe will need a heavy lift and a strategic heavy lift, and for that if ever they need to have one w/o going in from the start , A380 is there. And thats what i stand by.

    And Arthurs frst and foremost one was Airrbus was concentrating on A400 so such thing was not a possiblity, but he forgot that the commiting part on design was over and now it moves on to another department …. but i find u guys conviction of the thing being impossible, thats really great … lol

    in reply to: Indian Submarine Competition #2068445
    Blackcat
    Participant

    Now let me also get this one over here which I think, I had missed on earlier occations. So though y not post it here now again my renewed intrest for the Brahmos Amur Complex has given me this , and Victor, do u got any other pic of that model?

    But if I’m not wrong, I think what i found out was that, during DefExpo’04 Rubin did display their new Amur or say the Brahmos Amur Complex! …… and that largely went unnoticed???

    below are some pictures – two from Harry’s collection and the other one that of Rupak’s (if I am not wrong) collection when he put up his collection on some temp site during the days when DefExpo’04’ was going on.

    the first thing that I always had circling my mind has been the incompatiblity of that Amur 950 and Amur 1650 to what I had in my mind to the size and shape of the two members of the Amur family. But it had to make a force landing as Harry reported it as Amur 950 and Amur 1650 which I guess was in tune with what was displayed over there. And I guess Harry, I had asked u if u had any better close-up pictures of that Amur model (and Gorshkov), earlier too. But plzzz this time check again if u got any other pictures of the Amur model —- though a preferrable one would have been be a bit more topper view.

    If u guys check out the models namey the displayed 950 and 1650, then it (atleast for me) don’t match up to whatever figures I’ve got for these two. With the one mentioned as 950 not even close to the 950 (from my POV). Also from the two pictures, the one that Rupak (?) took did not have the placard ‘Amur 950’ placed in front of it, which I think is a modified Amur 1650. Where as the later-on (?) pictures of that model show that Placard, naturally binding that model firmly as Amur 950 in which, we as of now did had no great intrest. Now was that intended for misleading or say to make it stay from pyring eyes w/o actually putting cover??? ……. was it a managed affair or someone misplaced it ??? ….. well I don’t know, Hope Harry and others would be able to throw some light over his (if any) discussion with the guys at the Rubin’s Stall. Now was there a reason for Rubin to display the Amur950 when the Indian Navy’s clear definition for sea-denial meant a real capable SSK??? ….. well i guess not, untill and unless Indian Navy had any immediate needs for smaller subs meant for the role thats intended for Amur 950.

    In the said Amur 950, which I think is a modified Amur 1650 ….
    – u can see some ‘hump’ which has been given a good smoothing finish for keeping the hydrodynamics to the best.
    – u can also see somewhat top-to-bottom cylindrically shaped ‘vaccum’ , 5 of them, in-line.
    – u can also see a hatch opened right on top of one of that silo or Silo number 4 as I’ve designated it for ease.

    Now my speculation of that model being a modified Amur 1650 is also based on these things, coz the cylindrically shaped top-to-bottom affair has not been seen on any earlier figures, but don’t know if 950 is said to have any such thing. The hump on its back if considered to be a meter high would make the PJ-10 with its 9m length fit in very well considering that the height of the Hull is 8.2 meters for Amur1650. But if this actually is a modified Amur1650, then it could well be having 10 Silos in 2 rows with a meter and more (?) to spare between these rows for passage. Also the hatch that can be seen opened directly above and in line with one of the speculated silo does not seem like a regular rescue one. But it looks more like the missile silo hatch with a rectangular outside and a circular shell attached from the bottom …….

    now thats what I felt like from my observations and is bound to be terribly wrong, if someone can throw more light on what I feel is a modified Amur 1650. Or it could also be truly the Amur-950 with 5 VL silo, but then with a hull height of 6.4m , accomodating PJ-10 class or the Klub-class would need nearly 3 m hump on its back, which is not the case here.

    So I’d like to take my view of it being actually a modified Amur1650 with VL silos, which intentionally slipped-off the media during the expo, untill somone put more info on that model and put to rest what I believe as to what it is.

    in reply to: Indian Submarine Competition #2068463
    Blackcat
    Participant

    Nitin,

    also do not forget to mention as to the forced scaling back off the experience that IN gained during the Charlie lease, and it was the backboneless Indian Gov and another Baffoon that ruled Russia that made sure that IN could not have it any longer

    ——————————————
    k guys, now the kind of hump back that I see in the amur is like the Severodvinsk Class (and as such, I believ ATV or an ‘MKI’ for Indian Navy) . In the pictures below u can see the 12 VLS or 12 Silos thats shown in the it. The pic shows the 4 silos and it has to be in a 3 row config with 4 each as the Severodvinsk class is reported to have 12 silos for launching missiles vertically. From the side profile a small hump can also be made out, but not anywhere near to what a Delta class have. Now thats how i hope the Brahmos Amur complex will look like on the Amur with a VL capablity. Also i dont think a config like what the naval forces described or visualised is gonna get in, as that simply is not the way and hopefully they represented it in the wrong way.

    here are some pictures of the Severodvinsk class with the first one an older one and the other a newer graphical representation of the sub though i guess its not official (?). To put a bit more on the S’insk class the two representation has huge difference the way things have changed and things are a bit more clearer in the newer and coz of that angled profile of second picture.

    firstly I’d like to say that it seems like its made up of 11 sections or module (as can be made out from the newer second picture, though I may be wrong) so taking that same one to the older picture , u guys can see –

    In the first one the subs main propulsion unit is placed in the second last section and the reactor module after the Silo section .Where as, in the newer one u will get to see the propulsion section being pushed forward and the reactor section/module being next to the Silo section. I think this has been done considering the c.g of the sub and for obvious better handling. Seems like it has been done to concentrate all the mass and heavy units towards a central sectional length, freeing the ends for crew accomodation or shifting them from the earlier position to the second last section. Maybe this change over makes the sub to dive and surface faster as the ballast tanks pumping in & out will be more effective with reduced work for that ‘imbalance’ needed to get the subs nose point upward or downward and so does the duty of the sails, though I cud be wrong.

    Its also noticable that the torpedo room seems like have been shifted to the upper deck from the middle section in the newer picture.

    Oh k comng back to the Amur, unlike the Severodvinsk class it has the option of either a damn unmatched firepower for an SSK with a ‘regular’ submerged endurance or with the ‘standard’ arsenal with a longer submerged endurance. And thats from what Indian Navy – when going-in for the Amur – will have to choose from. And I am pretty sure if that happens, it would be a mix of these two ….. as u can see from pictures down below, the AIP integrated Amurs (blanked out section) module will have to be replaced and a section comparable to that would be inserted – after the conning tower – where the Silos would be based, as speculated earlier 8 silos would be integrated in that section.

    But I’d have loved to see these both happening , which seems unlikely as that would only increase the length and displacement and hence also decrease the snorkelling and submerged speed. But then, don’t u guys think it would indeed be good even though at the cost a some 2-3 knots? …coz that gives u a submerged endurance of nearly 50 days with 8 (speculated earlier) land attack or anti-ship arsenal w/o giving any hint of u laying dormant for the right time to ambush.

    now if that becomes a reality then the above mentioned one of a two-config Amur – a pure AIP equipped SSK (with a min 4 missiles fired through TT) for that extended period of duty; another one having a bit more heavier disp with 8 Silos loaded with Land-attack or Anti-ship missiles for that added firepower and then finally another one having 2 modules added to the basic Amur-1650 with one for AIP and the other one for Silos ….. and this will possiblity take the number of members of the Amur family to 7 or 8. Which will make the Amur1650/1850 designation for the last two member invalid coz of its increased displacement and firepower for the first and an increased disp, length and of course, increased firepower for the second.

    Blackcat
    Participant

    Russia has been part of the ICAO since at least the 1970s when it was still the USSR. So Finland and other has nothing to do with “clipping” the wings of Russian aircraft with an organization that Russia has been part of for decades.

    The ICAO norms are safety guidelines that are standard across the world. Undoubtedly these guidelines are influenced by Western countries and carriers. But Russia’s there as well as China and they’ve influenced those norms too.

    Now, you might be correct in that the norms are currently satisfied by a few select engines made in the US, Canada and Western Europe but they are still part of the requirements. And there are Russian planes which do satisfy the ICAO guidelines. The IL-96 gives an option of western engines (PWs), and the same goes for the TU-204.

    So the Finland routes could have all Russian aircraft that conform to ICAO if the excutives running those routes decide on it. The decision in the end comes down to the carriers. Their job is to build a customer base not be a customer for any particular aircraft manufacturing industry.

    Rightly or wrongly, Airbus and Boeing are simply more trusted. It’s not my bias, it’s the bias of the excutives running the world’s airlines. Just look at the world’s fleets that service international routes and the dominance of Boeing and AirBus. The large liners are already locked up but the regional carrier market is still a dogfight though two firms dominate that market, Embraer and Canada’s Bombardier.

    As far as the RRJ, if Embraer brings in an established set of products at a price $5m dollars cheaper than the RRJ, which is still on paper, the RRJ will be hurt along with the other Russian programs. Why? Because in all probability their only substantial market is in Russia and only if that market is protected from an Embraer or Bombardier.

    GD, I think u got me wrong, what i was mentining was thatb same ICAO norms the chapter 18 or something of which guides or stipulate the permissible limits for the niose and air pollution which all airliners should follow. When i mentioned the Finnish one, i meant that one coz it took some time for the Rusians to get their a/c to fully meet the guidelines (and still there are some) coz of which they had to use Airbus to fly to Finland and also they need to use the B767 (Aero flot uses , IL-96, A310, and B767) for long trips and that might have come in coz IL-96 was still using the engine which did not conform to ICAO STAGE III norms.

    BTW the IL-96 has been certified as u said with the PW-22XX something enigne i don rem the model. But its now having the PS-90A as the standard engine with sme still suing the PW engine mainly the IL-96-400 Freight or IL-96T

    and BTW, the Tu-204-120 is the only one which uses the RR engine as u can see from the fig above, with that RR plating on the engine. The earlier ones used engine numbers painted on their sides. THis came in coz when the norm came stricter there was not a readibliy available egine to fit and could not wait, coz waiting means air-travel to a stand still, thats how the RR and PW engines and Airbus and Boeings came into Russian arsenal.

    Again all the PS-90A meets the STAGE III and the D-30 series has also conform to the standards, and most probably the D-18 thats used on An-124 and 225 also meet, coz i don see if not how they are travelling to Europe and America

    for u once more the PS-90A series , note that the recent IL-78 of IAF which toured Europe to cross the Atlantic are powered by PS-90A

    There are three variants of PS-90A – the basic PS-90A, the PS-90A-76 and the improved PS-90A variant – PS-90A2.

    PS-90A
    The PS – 90A engine, is standard one for Ilyushin Il-96-400, Tupolev-204 family. It is rated at 35,200 pounds (157 kN) thrust.
    Fuel consumption does not exceed
    – 7000 … 8000 kg per 1 flight hour (for IL- 96 – 300);
    – 3500 kg per 1 flight hour (for TU-204)
    Oil consumption
    – No more than 0.3 kg per 1 engine for 1 flight hour

    PS-90A-76
    This is a modification of the basicPS-90A engine, which extends the service life of the large fleet of the IL-76 transport airplanes and raises their efficiency by replacing the earlier D-30KP. This is rated nominally at 32,000 pounds (142 kN) thrust.

    PS-90A2
    This is the advanced version of the PS-90A It is also lighter than PS-90A and features improved FADEC. All these is said to improve the performance and reduce maintenance costs by 40%. It is completely interchangeable to the PS-90A, allowing simple upgrades on present aircrafts with PS-90A engines. The thrust rating is same as the PS-90A with 35,200 pounds (157 kN) thrust, but is also capable of 39,600 pounds (176 kN) thrust.

    I do agree to what u said abt the choices, coz the difficult part is to penetrate and once thats done ur sailing goes smooth, and thats Y i have been emphasising abt the need to sharpen the skill of Russians for their product presentation and marketing the two things they lacks most. For instance I’d like to point out how they presented their new Tu-204-300, it was very dull, where as the ERJ-190 came in with dashing livery …. these guys also need to understand that a visual appeal for their product is an important part to make arose a curiosity among the customers as to think …..wow , which is that a/c. And curiosity is what makes them explore the a/c … and this is missing in them. And that said, I don conside none of their products starting from Tu-204, Il-96, aand all those previously mentioned to be inferior to what the market provides, but their stratergy in presenting , and marketing is severely flawed which needs a revamp. Get me in, I’ll show u how to penetrate the wast Chinese market 😉

    And if anyone of u guys have missed this, let me put it that Boeing uses the service of Russian cargo company Volga-Denper for their freighting their products too. Its the Soviet monster An-124 that freights the engines of Boeing B-777. The Electric GE90 which powers can only be freighted by these An-124s and each engine is nearly or more than in diameter to that of a B-737 fuselage. And w/o doubt it would be thee workhorses which would be doing its duty to freight the engines for the Boeing new 7E7 Dreamliner 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,140 total)