There’s a truism about computer projects that probably has a good read-over here:
“To budget,
to spec,
on time…
…pick any two.” 😉
8 or 80 kN, but 8000kN is almost 71 million pounds of thrust!
D’oh! 80 kN it was.
They have smaller engines, suitable for a smaller aircraft.
8000 kN each was quoted in this month’s J-Wings Magazine.
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20091123a1.html
“Japan gearing up to acquire F-35 fighters
Stealth jets would replace aging F-4 fleet”
The only thing is this bit further down in the article:
“The move apparently means priority has been put on strengthening air-defense capabilities as neighboring China makes efforts to enhance its air force by developing its own next-generation aircraft, analysts said.”
I don’t see the F-35 as being an air-defense aircraft, so maybe this article is more something put-out by a ministry bureaucrat than an actual official statement of intent (This does happen in Japan from time to time).
Also, the F-35 was supposed to be the focus of the F-XX requirement, the F-X being the AD fighter. From ARES
“Japan’s F-X program is aimed at buying 20-60 high performance F-22-like aircraft. The follow-on F-XX effort is being written to an F-35-like requirement for many more aircraft. Both programs will replace existing aircraft.”
So maybe there’s either been a mix-up by the journos – or F-X has morphed into the F-XX programme. Hard to tell which is the more likely – Japanese Bureaucrats move in mysterious ways…
How about the Super Hornet block II. How do the Japanese rate this aircraft compared to the Typhoon and the Mitsubishi F-2.
I can’t really comment on the SH BII regarding the F-2, as the F-2 isn’t in the JASDF F-X competition. As regards the Typhoon – the Super Hornet isn’t anywhere near it in the press. Generally the SH either gets a brief mention or is rated as a trailing competitor.
And a freighter disobeying traffic control and turning into the path of the JMSDF ship, effectively ramming the Japanese warship is the fault of the Japanese warship’s manning level how?
Sorry, I wasn’t being clear in my response – I was referring to the last line I quoted:
“This is just another of a few accidents, collisions, and fires involving JMSDF ships in recent months.”
The F-35 need not be available by 2011, just by next year/2011 when the decision is made that delivery will fit Japan’s required schedule.
I don’t think Japan wants Rafale because it’s more multi-role than the ASDF needs. The Typhoon is more air-combat orientated, which is what Japan wants. So it’s F-35 versus Typhoon.
True, Rafale is a long shot. Most Japanese aircraft mags rate Typhoon as being just behind the F-22 in desirability with Rafale a distant 3rd.
Now that the F-22’s out it’ll be interesting to see what the mags say vis-a-vis the F-35 and Typhoon.
http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20091029-00000708-yom-soci
http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20091029-00000029-maip-sociJCG said, based on AIS (automatic identification system) and radar data, the 7,401 tons container ship Carina Star at 12-14 knots (22-26 km/h) was moving at twice the speed of the 9,046 tons Panama freighter at six knots (11 km/h) moving eastwards before her, so tens of second before they would collide, she decelerated, turned left, and entered the opposite-direction “lane”, into the way of the 5,200 tons JDS Kurama moving westwards; while JCG traffic control advised the freighter to slip to starboard.
This is just another of a few accidents, collisions, and fires involving JMSDF ships in recent months.
I recall reading somewhere that the JMSDF has a serious manning problem at the moment the article stated that at least some ships are going to sea without a full complement.
And there are BNP councillors in the UK. So?
Sorry for the late reply. Yes, there are BNP councillors in the UK – but they are not mainstream, nor do they publish school textbooks.
MSDF DDH damaged in collision
The destroyer Kurama was damaged yesterday in a collision with a South Korean freighter in the Kammon Straight, Japan.
There appears to be substantial damage to the bow. I wonder if this will push a decision on the DDH22?
Story at: http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20091028a1.html
Japan has apologised. It has also paid compensation to governments per the Treaty of San Fransisco. Just because certain Asian governments like to sometimes whip up/pander to nationalism in complaining that Japan still hasn’t done enough doesn’t mean Japan has been inactive.
The problem is this: Japan has apologized a lot, but then nationalistic politicians have gotten up and said to Japan and the world that Japan has done nothing to be ashamed of.
There are actually Board of Education in Japan today that push ultra-nationalistic textbooks filled with such ****e.
Photos like that are just depressing. 🙁
Seconded, we sailed past the Ark in various forms of dismantlement on the ferry over from Northern Ireland to Scotland. As a tech-mad teenager it was heart-rending to see such a ship get cut down to nothing.
Fair enough & respected, point taken, sorry if I offended you in any way, wasn’t my intentions. Being English myself, I also have family from Ireland & Scotland as well of course, England too, the Irish side being the biggest of the lot, so, we crack jokes at eachother quite often, so. Probably where I got it from.
No probs, things can just be very impersonal on the net – hard to get the intended tone accross.
Being English myself, I also have family from Ireland & Scotland as well of course, England too, the Irish side being the biggest of the lot, so, we crack jokes at each other quite often, so. Probably where I got it from.
Heh! Sounds a bit like my family…
Yep, I’d also expect it to be watered down somewhat too. Lets face it, I’ve mentioned this before, if the US don’t want or are VERY reluctant to share tech with their closest “friend”, i.e Great Britian, then Japan can wave goodbye to any hope of tech transfere. Just my thoughts, not that they matter.
Agreed.
Yeah, we live in a country where the Scots, English, Welsh & Irish have had little digs, i.e jokes, at eachother for god knows how long, so, take it as a joke with a pinch of salt. And I like to add, it was a bit of a metaphor for trying to explain to someone about what we were having a discussion about a particiular topic, whom of of which didn’t get what I was trying to say. Hence why I said it, in no mean way of course.
Can we get back on topic, please? Thanks.
Not quite yet EELightning.
Maybe it’s ok to crack jokes at the Irish when you’re down the pub with your pals – but this is an open internet forum, not the pub. So far I’m the only Irishman (and Ulsterman) to respond – but IMHO it’s right out in this forum. Maybe it’d be more suited to the WAFF – and we know what that’s like.
Also, having wee digs at each other is all right when people know each other. You’re just a username to me (at the moment) – so what you’re doing is the equivalent of walking up to a guy in the pub who has an Irish accent and saying ‘you’re a moron’ – in a loud voice, to the whole pub.
If, and its a BIG if, Japan does get the F-22, more than likely its going to have some serious strings attached, very-VERY limited tech transfere, sanctions & what not and of course, stupidly expensive…So, will it be worth all the hassle of buying them?…Call me picky but, not much of a good deal to me. My 2 British pennies worth.
Agreed – I’d expect an export F-22 to Japan to be seriously ‘black-boxed’ (i.e. sealed electronics modules) and training overseen by the US – so as to avoid the ‘can I borrow the AEGIS manuals?’ type scenario that occurred with the JSDF in the past.
Its a bit like trying to explain to an Irishman why he can’t have a garden complete with a water fountain and a tool shed because he lives on the 7th floor of a block of flats… :rolleyes:
Wow – pathetic stereotyping there EELightning. Wonderfully united kingdom we live in eh?