dark light

Rodolfo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 1,190 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How long before anti-stealth SAM? #1798792
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I’m aware that RCS can vary with different bands, however we don’t know what sort of reductions that may have been made in metric etc… An F-22 is still not going to be as reflective as a conventional design though.

    Yes; but the VHF wave is too large to be reduced by RAM and so on. The problem here is that the characteristic lengths of the figther size F-22 are quite similar to the wave size. So, scattering can not be avoided. The B-2 is much more stealth efficient on these frequencies.

    in reply to: How long before anti-stealth SAM? #1798797
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Objects have different RCSs on different bands. I.e. a F-22 has an extremely low RCS in the X-band but is not very different from a F-15 in the metric-band.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2353548
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Crying for the knocked Georgian puppet?! Lets stay on the subject.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798919
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Capability to destroy hypersonic targets with a speed of 7km/s

    No. Capability to destroy targets with a ballistic speed up to 7 km/s. That’s the warhead of an ICBM with 10.500 km range, but the warhead, in the end phase, is moving slower.

    AFAIK, S-500 is touted with Capability to destroy hypersonic targets with a speed of “just” 5 km/s.

    in reply to: US DOD highlights sustainable defense budget #2324777
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    It sounds like a VLO B-1B. Cool! 😎

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2325863
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    The Israelis should demonstrate they have a working nuclear bomb by underground detonation preceded by a public announcement. All other nuclear powers; U.S., France, UK, Russia, China, India, Pakistan have detonate a live bomb. If Israel does possess a working nuclear bomb, then Iran would leave Israel alone. The detonation can be verified by seismograph.

    On the contrary, this may encourage the Iranian hardliners to speed-up their own bomb. Lets Israel play the fuzzy game they master. I think that’s better for all sides.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2327063
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Your questionable claim about the F-117As aside a little help about the meaning of stealth from serious people about that. 😉
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_aircraft

    Dont be upset

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117_Nighthawk#Combat_losses

    Some sources claim that a second F-117A was damaged during the same campaign, allegedly on 30 April.[47] Although the aircraft returned to base, it supposedly never flew again.[48][49]

    48. Riccioni, Colonel Everest E. “Description of our Failing Defence Acquisition System.” Project on government oversight, 8 March 2005.
    49. Nixon, Mark. “Gallant Knights, MiG-29 in Action during Allied Force.” AirForces Monthly magazine, January 2002.

    Ms. Moon, the guilty

    Returned: 1 displays of 1 matches
    Need to narrow your results? See our Search Tips.

    BALKANS NOTEBOOK
    F-117 damage said attributed to full moon
    Date: May 6, 1999 Publication: The Atlanta Journal and The Atlanta Constitution Page Number: A14 Word Count: 487

    A U.S. F-117 Stealth fighter reportedly was damaged by a Yugoslav surface-to-air missile over Serbia last Friday, but managed to return safely to its base in Germany.

    The aircraft is almost invisible to radar, but may have been seen and targeted under the light of a full moon, according to United Press International, citing anonymous Pentagon officials. Another F-117 went down in Serbia on March 27, also during a full moon.

    Some military officials believe the light of a full moon

    Anyway… it was the end of the childish propaganda.

    in reply to: How long before anti-stealth SAM? #1799061
    Rodolfo
    Participant
    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2327622
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    First of all, there was only one F-117 that was shot down, and yes, it was as blind as the Migs(no ECM, RWR, MLD/MAWS).
    Secondly, I already pointed to a recent example of non-stealthy Israeli planes flying into Syria undetected, and unopposed by SAMs.
    Thirdly, 29 TOR M1s is hardly an inpenetrable gauntlet, and they aren’t the targets in any event.

    Just one F-117 downed but another one damaged beyon repair. Those facts implied the end of the “stealth = invisible = invincible” propaganda.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2329851
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    How could Israel sustain a 5-day air campaign against Iran? Where would its aircraft operate from? In whose airspace would they refuel? What is the likelihood of any of the countries between Iran & Israel allowing the Israelis to operate freely in their airspace for day after day?

    Saudi Arabia. See WikiLeaks. Israel and the Saudis are de facto allies.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2331795
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Why do you think the Iranians stopped supporting the Insurgency in Iraq openly?

    To hold on and restart (at a higher level) as retaliation tool just in case an U.S.A-Israel agression.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2332449
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Even considering the “One strike Option” succesful,… what will follow on? No the day after, but a few months after. Shia militias stirring blood Iraq, a much more active Hezbo, more modern and lethal IED in Afganisthan and so on. That’s, I think, will be the “Persian answer”. That’s the best “Iranian air defense net”.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2332720
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    It only deters a war though, not a singular strike. How does sinking the tankers stop the Israelis launching a strike? The Israelis know they can ignore Iran’s warnings and strike anyway, at which point sinking tankers just hurts Iran. The threat of oil price rises for the US or a bit of heat from the US is nothing compared to Iran getting a nuke from Israels perspective. When the facilities go, the game is over. Iran needs to form some proper anti-air defences if it wants to hold off an Iranian air strike, and they just don’t seem to be doing it.

    First I doubt Israel alone have the capability to destroy the Iranian nuclear program. Anyway the Persian air-defence net can’t stop them. So, the likely deterrence tool will likely be a Katyushas rain from Lebanon after the strike. I also think to try to build some anti-air net to face an American AND Israeli AND (likely) Saudi strike is pointless. The dis-proportion of forces is so huge that Iran will alway have to use “dirty” assymetric answers. Better to spend their scarce resources in Ash weapons, chemical armed sabotage teams in Iraq and so on.

    The Persian Army is too weak for the task, but they may use dirty resources to flame all the Gulf Region. Just my view.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2332831
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    There would be little point as it would be too late! Once Israel has hit the reactors, trying to make the West stop Israel’s attack will be pointless, as the Israelis will already have completed and stopped their attack. In any case, Iran has tried the old sinking tankers trick and look how bad that turned out for them! From Israels point of view, oil price rises are a minor cost to take out the key parts of the Iranian nuclear programme. The amazing thing is how little the Iranians are doing to prevent it! One could say they have a “hidden strategy”, but as Iraq proved its more likely that the leaders just aren’t that interested.

    Because there’s not really any money it relative to angering various other countries.

    Off-course. Agreed oil price rises are a minor cost for Israel. But for the U.S.A bleeding economy it will be a nigthmare. Iranians want Israel partners to feel the pain. That’s a weird form of deterrence, but in the end it works as deterrence. We are not in the 80s anymore. Today $90/barrel.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2332962
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    The Iranian “air-defense” will be asymmetric. I.e., someone start bombing Iran, Iran will start sinking oil-tankers. If they manage to hit several tankers in the gulf, oil will skyrocket to near $200/barrel, and the West will start to scream. Very simple.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 1,190 total)