It looks awesome! 😎
How many Su-34 do the Russian Air Force have now?
New Russia LPAR
http://russianforces.org/blog/2010/12/a_new_early-warning_radar_is_b.shtml
Question: To replace the dismantled one in Krasnoyarsk during the mid-80s?
Four new Su-34 delivered
I don’t get it too.
I also bet the new “heavy” missile will be in the SS-19 class.
From http://www.russianforces.org
http://russianforces.org/blog/2010/12/topol-m_and_rs-24_missiles_in.shtml
According this site, RS-24 carry 3 warheads (See http://russianforces.org/missiles/).
Two missiles! That’s an “impressive” re-armament rate! :(:mad:
Western military district gets first Iskander tactical missile system
The first Iskander tactical surface-to-surface ballistic missile system has entered service with the Russian Army’s Western Military District, regional commander Arkady Bakhin said on Tuesday.
“We are at practically 98 percent permanent readiness. We are carrying out reequipment and delivery of new types of weapons,” Bakhin said.
Iskander is designed for tactical strikes on small, high value land targets. The export variant has a range of 280 km but the variant in Russian service has a range of 500 km.
Full Story
According to the last media releases the range on Iskander-M is 450km-500km. That’s the INF treaty “minus an inch”. Now, is widely acknowledged, it flies a “flat” (depressed) trajectory. That’s mean, if launched in the optimal ballistic trajectory, Iskander-M is already “violating” the INF treaty. Right?
Rest of photos here.
The radar doesn’t looks very healthy.
Acording to Podvig’s blog…
http://russianforces.org/blog/2010/12/topol_launch_from_kapustin_yar.shtml
… something experimental was tested on a Topol.
What is known about the weight and size of the typical MaRV? Public pix usually show a cone with flaps around the base. Should not add too much, a little longer maybe.
Agreed, but this is just useful for atmospheric (i.e. terminal phase) maneuvers.
If orbital maneuvering is desired things get more complicated. Segmented multi-part bus? Adds weight, increases at least one dimensions. Probably makes three, four warheads the max, only very large missiles could carry more.
A few years ago something like that was tested on a SS-19 and also on a Topol. Different gadgets? We don’t know
Apropos very large missile: Not too optimistic about another Russian liquid monster. The low strategic warhead count of the new START treaty does not favour multi-warhead monsters from the standpoint of survivability.
Voevoda-like monsters are definitively gone. But there are recurrent reports on a new liquid fuel ICBM around 100 tn. That’s like an “up-to-date SS-19”. That’s a “monster” in face of i.e. a RS-24 but certainly a “midget” in face a Voevoda.
The best form of defence is offence, so a good defence would be to give the Argentinians something to really fear. The best, and easiest idea, is a blockade until they give the islands back. That doesn’t mean blocking all traffic, just declare all shipping to/from Argentina within a certain distance of Argentina as a target, and start sinking a couple, the insurance costs alone will do 90% of the job for us. Maybe mix in special forces raids on some of their most important infrastructure. Another idea could be to start taking out their power stations, once their population starts to suffer they’ll soon see the error of occupying our territory. Hydroelectric ones are an ideal target, and they have 12 for us to destroy. When the Argentine civilians start seeing consequences of their government actions against us, they will soon decide that the Islands aren’t worth it.
They could be used for attacking the Falklands, reality is though, they’ll end up using them for peacekeeping and in natural disasters, both of which are really in our interests.
Or a transport plane full of marines, paras or the like with heavy weapons and another with food and ammo. As is, the current base set up means the Argentines will pay a very big price in military lives in launching an attack on the Islands.
I love statements like that. Those “brave heart” guys who wish to demolish civilian infrastructure and kill civilians will be the first to scream “terrorists!” just in case Iranian sabotage teams performing similar activities, as asymmetrical retaliatory strikes, in the country of the “brave heart” guys. That’s the good-old double-standard.
Anyway, be careful. If the USA and satellite countries start to attack Iran you may be lucky and face likely sabotage operations like that in Europe.
Cheers.:rolleyes:
Sorry by the off-topic.
Terminal maneuvers are useful to avoid systems like Sprint or Gazelle but not mid-course interceptors. Here where MARV warheads come. But they need fuel to “randomize” its ballistic path. And fuel means weight. Considering that RS-24 is an adapted Topol-M, its payload will no go much beyond 1.2 tn. And this payload is necessary to just ONE MARV. So, it is difficult to accept the idea that RS-24 can carry several MARV.
Quite likely Russia will deploy multiple MARV in the future, but I assume this will be carried out in the new liquid fuel ICBM. RS-24 is too small for this. I bet it just carries conventional MIRV plus a sensible load of decoys and penaids.
How do we know they are maneuverable?
AFAIK, the liquid fuel heavy ICBM is so far a “paper rocket”. Its development should start in 2015. It will weight around 100 tn with a payload around 4 tn and should carry up to ten warheads.
Now, it seems interesting the new about the Topol-M superseded by the RS-24. What about the much vaunted Topol-M MARV warhead? It seems the SRF choose the good old method named “saturation” to confront prospective ABM systems. By the way, how many warheads carry a RS-24? 3, 4 or 6?