dark light

Rodolfo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 1,190 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2430599
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    a decade ago they were quite bold with 2007 first flight date

    A decade ago some westerners big talkers told us that Russian 5th generations fighters are just “paper planes” and that Russia is unable to build 5th generation fighters and AESA.:diablo:

    Check the reality.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1805839
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Thanks Austin. Now I understand. Deployed S-400 use the 48N6DM and have “just” 250 km reach :cool:. Not grave at all. Subsequent systems will deploy the 40N6 missile with 400 km range :diablo:.

    It is like cars. The first two batteries are “base versions while the next will be “full versions” (with ABS on all wheels, more airbags and a better stereo-sound equipment :D).

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1805842
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    What do the above article mean, Otaku?

    May be that already deployed systems can’t reach 400 km and reach “just”250 km and follow on system will reach 400 km?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2430672
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    The next question is will Russian airforce’s 48 su-35s get L band and an X band AESA? By this way it can be a game changer together with the PAK-FA in the future.

    I don’t think so. They will just convert Russia (and protected allies) in a “stop or die” zone for NATO and Chinese planes. May be Russia may project aerial power on i.e. East and South Ukraine, the Black Sea and “near abroad” like those. The rest of the world (except China and India) will be dominated by USA and OTAN aerial assets, as today.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1805860
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    The first S-400 battery was inducted as early as 2007. I can’t understand what the first paragraph means. :confused:

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2006642
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Not at all risky , else YD will be just lying idel doing nothing , atleast they can conduct the test for Bulava and if successful reduce the operational test needed for the missile.

    May be. May be is safer to first test from the YD some dummy missiles and later proceed with the real ones, like was did it on the Donskoy.

    And what will be the fate of the Donskoy now? Scrapped or converted to SLCM launcher? I hope the last option will be the selected one.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2006720
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Risky

    Russia will this year use the Yury Dolgoruky nuclear powered submarine for the first time to carry out test launches of the troubled Bulava missile, a Defense Ministry official said on Wednesday.

    “Tests will be conducted in the summer – most likely in June, from the White Sea, when it is free of ice,” he said.

    So far all test launches have been conducted from the Dmitry Donskoy nuclear-powered submarine.

    The Yury Dolgoruky is the newest of Russia’s Borey-class strategic nuclear submarines, which have been exclusively designed for the Bulava, and is currently undergoing sea trials.

    The future development of the Bulava sea-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) has been questioned by some lawmakers and defense industry officials, who have suggested that all efforts should be focused on the existing Sineva SLBM.

    But that would require major changes to the Borey-class submarines and the Russian military has insisted that there is no alternative to the Bulava and pledged to continue testing the missile until it is ready to be put into service with the Navy.

    The vessel is 170 meters (580 feet) long, has a hull diameter of 13 meters (42 feet), a crew of 107, including 55 officers, a maximum depth of 450 meters (about 1,500 feet) and a submerged speed of about 29 knots. It can carry up to 16 ballistic missiles and torpedoes.

    Construction costs totaled some $713 million, including $280 million for research and development.

    Two other Borey-class nuclear submarines, the Alexander Nevsky and the Vladimir Monomakh, are in different stages of completion. Russia is planning to build eight of these subs by 2015.

    Fourth-generation Borey-class nuclear-powered submarines are expected to constitute the core of Russia’s modern strategic nuclear submarine fleet.

    The submarines’ entry into service could be delayed however by the series of setbacks in the development of the troubled Bulava missile, which has officially suffered seven failures in 12 tests.

    Some analysts suggest that in reality the number of failures was considerably larger, with Russian military expert Pavel Felgenhauer contending that of the Bulava’s 12 test launches, only one was entirely successful.

    MOSCOW, February 24 (RIA Novosti)

    in reply to: Falklands War 2010 #2431285
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    So how much do Sukhoi marketing employees make?

    Counter-arguments? Thanks.

    Look at the map, the country size. Is not better for Argentina to have 18 Su-35BM rather than 36 Mirage-2000/Rafale?

    Anyway, to go against the U.K. is suicidal. Like it or not, nukes still matter.

    in reply to: Falklands War 2010 #2431300
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    The Argentine military doesn’t like Russian weapons, so to buy something like the Flanker is not considered by now.

    The Argentinean military should kill this nonsense “taste”. It’s true that Soviet post-sell services were sorry, but things changed a lot after the USSR disintegration. Ask Indians that have a lot more complicated geostrategic position and its Top-Gun Fighter is the Su-30MKI. Indians are proud and highly satisfied with the MKI.

    Note also that, except 5th Generation Fighters, there is nothing ahead of the Su-35BM. Nor Americans nor Europeans can sell a plane of this class, and note this ultimate Flanker fits perfectly on the Argentinean Air Force needs, given the country size and long littoral.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2431936
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Here’s some recent ‘shots in the dark’ from the authority that is F-16.net, enjoy:

    They seems upseted and rabid because of the PAK FA. Trolling always with the same phrases doesn’t delete the PAK FA from reality. 😀

    Anyway, the thing is already in Moscow?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2431942
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Shkval torpedo that likely sunk the Kursk

    Sure? It was a conventional Torpedo

    and the Beluva submarine

    Beluva? :dev2::eek:

    Just more Neocon big talkers launching empty words. As usual. :diablo:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2432064
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    The smart thing of course, is to do like India. buy a 50/50 mix of F-18 and PAKFA.

    Russia is after all not a natural adversary to Australia.

    Will Russia sells PAK FA to Australia considering the Aussie friendship with the States? May be Su-34 makes more sense, in order to replace the venerable F-111. May be Mr. Kopp will not be happy on this, but what about a 50:50 mix of F-35 and Su-34?

    PAK FA will be available for India,… so far :dev2:

    in reply to: 4.99 generation fighter #2432074
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    And U.S.A have money and will; and Russia have little money but a big will,… oh that’s getting Byzantine. :confused:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA saga Episode 12.0 #2432081
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Well, if Mr. Kopp is really disgusted with the F-35 and the F-22 is not for sales, he should start to lobby for Australia to buy the PAK FA.

    It will be a real funny mess to see squadrons of Su-50MKA flying for Australia and a real slap in the face of LM. 😀

    in reply to: 4.99 generation fighter #2432153
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    UK
    Australia
    Canada
    Japan
    Israel
    Singapore
    Poland
    Ukraine

    Forget Ukraine. :rolleyes: The dark age of the Oranges is over. The new president will look again to Mother Russia for likely near future upgrades of her aerial fleet.

    Anyway it will be interesting a new and separated thread on the modernization of the Ukrainian air forces.

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 1,190 total)