U.S. President Obama asks Iran to return the downed drone.
😮 :rolleyes:
Real interceptions? In this launched toward Sary-Shagan?
For me correlating building quality with colour painted pipes is … a very weird way to evaluate a quality of a vessel.
Colour painted pipes = high quality & gray pipes = bad quality :confused::confused:
Ivan Drago is Swedish. :p
Sorry I can’t avoid it. 😮
I am not sure Nebo-M will be deployed as far as these distances from the batteries. It can be deployed as a forward surveillance station, true! But if the idea is to provide high quality tracking data of stealth targets, it should be deployed much near than that because the idea is to provide a small likelihood-cloud to the engagement radar that will “burn” this cloud, via a very narrow beam with an insane quantity of radiated energy on the engagement band.
Or, is the system able to provide engagement quality data?
If the Nebo-M is for battery level, what does the S-400 use at the regiment level?
I don’t’ think so. IMO the 3 radars will work at regiment level and will pass very refined information to the batteries. Engagement radars will point a very-very narrow beam to the spot released by the data-fusion station.
I don’t think so. In the past, some S-300 batteries were deployed with both Clam-Shell and Tin-Shield radars at a regiment level in addition to the battery level engagement radars. Later both radars were replaced by Chesse-Board (battery level) and Big Bird (regiment level).
In addition what can happen with a malfunction? If some radar broke, the data-fusion station will still be able to operate with data provided by the other two. That means redundancy and robustness. Off course the cost will be a few more trucks and operators but, I think, it is worthwhile.
Only ten new diesel subs by 2020 is pathetic to be honest.
Well, if the delivery schedule is fulfilled, I will consider good rather than pathetic.
What seems troublesome is the Ladas saga.
MiG-31BM may also be used to patrol the Russian soft south border with Central-Asia stans.
Yes, I know, there is a low likelihood bombers will come from this direction.
Some questions on that chances for a XXI century scenario
Which are the current estimated chances of ALCMs reaching their respective targets on CONUS and on Russia?
May far-north NATO patrols liquidate the most of the Tu-95 and Tu-160 fleet?
Estimated decimation percentage the S-300 & S-400 may inflict to ALCMs launched from NATO bombers and subs?
May the MiG-31 liquidate some ALCM-launcher-bombers on the far-north?
Israeli black-teams were active in Iran. I will not discard such an explanation.
An ICBM interception model
http://faculty.nps.edu/oayakime/rapidprototyping/yakimenko%20-%20lukacs%20aiaa-2007-6538-911.pdf
PD: Some ICBM and interceptor parameters looks strange but the whole paper seems good 😉
Why?
The Phobos Grunt drama with updates
Swerve is right. Oil extraction costs in Saudi Arabia are considerably lower than in Russia. Like it or not, Saudi Arabia is the oil superpower. Russia will need an insane investment level to start exploiting those huge Siberian fields.
The Russian power-that-be never accepted Yelzin’s drunken liquidation of 1000 years of Moscovskoye expansion. A strong military is needed to re-establish Russia’s glory and world standing.
But Kudrin is right – despite record level pumping and Russia currently being No1 oil exporter its base to support all the military and social programme expansions is awfully narrow; and nothing in sight to widen that base.
100% true!