dark light

Rodolfo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 1,190 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BLACKJACKs In Venezuela #2476649
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Stupid games

    in reply to: SU-35 , how will it sell? #2477391
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    A joint Brazilian-Argentine purchase? Both want to replace their venerable Mirage-III and there were recent talks on military coordination.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2070888
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Yeap. The problem is the SIZE of the inaccuracy. When you mix serious analysis with wishes, such a big error arises. 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2070932
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    He is far more accurate than you, all you are criticising is analysis, none of which he ever reported as fact and all of which he later corrected.

    Just compare the real SS-25 withdraw-rate with the Podvig-forecasted rate. This is the reliability of his forecasts. Off course, if you want to believe him, there is no problem. The problem is that reality is in other place.

    in reply to: R-33/r-37 #1785458
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I saw a picture of the MiG-31D based ASAT missile some month ago. It is larger than the F-15 based Vougth missile. Much larger than a R-37. No way a R-37 can have ASAT capability.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2071021
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Podvig is not a realible surce anymore. Too many “unconfirmed” news and “unconfirmed failures”. His forecasting about retirement of Topol were too far from the real numbers. He also “witdraw” the Ss-N-18 monts before confirmed real tests. Too many wrongs.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1785479
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    .

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2480791
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Well, according the comments from RSM-55 on some sort of similitude between the YF-23 and PAK-FA; and the available PAK-FA draws on the net, this Paralay one is the most likely approximation to the reality:

    http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/2049/drawingpakfaparalaybaseyy3.jpg

    PD: It is interesting also the concept of multi-band conformal array radars.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2482483
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Well yeah, if you’re going to copy something you want to copy the best.

    Sadly, PAK-FA will not be exactly like YF-23. I fall in love with the Black Widow when I see her pics. :eek::)

    http://www.machtres.com/bw2.jpg

    Unfortunately, the American AF selected the Raptor, but you know, who is the best looking one. 😀

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2483246
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Supposedly it will look like a YF-23 rather than the Berkut of the F-22.

    in reply to: Iran launches satellite carrier into space #1785721
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Anyway, they seems to have started the path.

    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I still don’t see why sovereign nations shouldn’t be allowed to join NATO if they choose to do so. I understand why it irritates Russia, but if the Ukraine and Georgia want to join NATO, what are they really going to do about it?

    Well, Ukrainian people are adamantly opposed to a NATO entry in spite of a strong propaganda campaign. Nevertheless, Yuschenko, while refusing to allow a referendum on the use (he knows the poll results), is still pushing his agenda in the hope that a future propaganda war will change the people mind. I doubt it will succeed.

    So, in the Ukrainian case, the issue is more related to the wishes of their president rather than related to the will of the Ukrainian people. After all, he was also indoctrinated in a way similar to that of the little Stalin, now ruling Georgia.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1785758
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Sean, according DTIG, 9M82M can do 2.675 m/s. I remember an article claiming a quite similar 2.7 km/s.

    http://www.dtig.org/docs/sa-12.pdf

    Anyway, not sources cited.

    PD: They also Chaim a top Speedy of 2.5 km/s for the 48N6DM

    http://www.dtig.org/docs/sa-21.pdf

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1785764
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I wonder how a 48N6DM is able to intercept a 4.8 km/s ballistic speed missile if the considerably faster 9M82M can barely deal with a 4.5 km/s ballistic speed target. If this is possible, the tracking capability of the S-400 respect to the S-300VM had to be improved at least three-fold.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1785768
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    So, the Russian will skip the deployment of PM-2 and S-300VM in favour of PMU-3 (aka S-400) and later the S-500, right?

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 1,190 total)